Progress toward national estimates of police use of force

This research builds on three decades of effort to produce national estimates of the amount and rate of force used by law enforcement officers in the United States. Prior efforts to produce national estimates have suffered from poor and inconsistent measurements of force, small and unrepresentative...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2018-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e0192932-e0192932
Main Authors: Garner, Joel H, Hickman, Matthew J, Malega, Ronald W, Maxwell, Christopher D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Confidence intervals
Consortia
Criminal investigation
Criminal investigations
Deadly force
Demographic aspects
Departments
Enforcement
Engineering and Technology
Estimates
Jurisdiction
Law enforcement
Laws, regulations and rules
Medicine and Health Sciences
Missing data
Murders & murder attempts
People and Places
Police
Politics
Research and Analysis Methods
Social research
Social Sciences
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Studies
Task forces
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-42bdc85e72953a44748db57069a90f08e023a342580bd83cce41273141a2d9693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-42bdc85e72953a44748db57069a90f08e023a342580bd83cce41273141a2d9693
container_end_page e0192932
container_issue 2
container_start_page e0192932
container_title PloS one
container_volume 13
creator Garner, Joel H
Hickman, Matthew J
Malega, Ronald W
Maxwell, Christopher D
description This research builds on three decades of effort to produce national estimates of the amount and rate of force used by law enforcement officers in the United States. Prior efforts to produce national estimates have suffered from poor and inconsistent measurements of force, small and unrepresentative samples, low survey and/or item response rates, and disparate reporting of rates of force. The present study employs data from a nationally representative survey of state and local law enforcement agencies that has a high survey response rate as well as a relatively high rate of reporting uses of force. Using data on arrests for violent offenses and the number of sworn officers to impute missing data on uses of force, we estimate a total of 337,590 use of physical force incidents among State and local law enforcement agencies during 2012 with a 95 percent confidence interval of +/- 10,470 incidents or +/- 3.1 percent. This article reports the extent to which the number and rate of force incidents vary by the type and size of law enforcement agencies. Our findings demonstrate the willingness of a large proportion of law enforcement agencies to voluntarily report the amount of force used by their officers and the relative strengths and weaknesses of the Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) program to produce nationally representative information about police behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0192932
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2002481196</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A527733947</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d120fc59fd904900af20da012d6cbd9d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A527733947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-42bdc85e72953a44748db57069a90f08e023a342580bd83cce41273141a2d9693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktmKFDEUhgtRnHH0DUQLBNGLbk-WWnIjDINLw8CI221IZelOk660Scrl7U1N1wxdMheSi2zf-U_OyV8UTxEsEWnQm60fQi_ccu97vQTEMCP4XnGK8rSoMZD7R-uT4lGMW4CKtHX9sDjBjNIGs-q0YJ-CXwcdY5n8LxFU2YtkfdYtdUx2J5KOpTfl3jsrdTlEPe6MD1I_Lh4Y4aJ-Ms1nxbf3775efFxcXn1YXZxfLmTNcFpQ3CnZVnpMR0ROS1vVVQ3UTDAw0GrARBCKqxY61RIpNUW4IYgigRWrGTkrnh90985HPlUdOQbAtEWI1ZlYHQjlxZbvQ352-MO9sPz6wIc1FyFZ6TRXCIORFTOKAWUAwmBQAhBWtewUU1nr7ZRt6HZaSd2nINxMdH7T2w1f-5-8ahFhLWSBV5NA8D-G3ES-s1Fq50Sv_XD9bgKkIqzJ6It_0Lurm6i1yAXY3vicV46i_LzCTUMIo6PW8g4qD6V3VmaLGJvPZwGvZwGZSfp3WoshRr768vn_2avvc_blEbvRwqVN9G4YXRXnID2AMvgYgza3TUbAR4ffdIOPDueTw3PYs-MPug26sTT5C37B87M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002481196</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Progress toward national estimates of police use of force</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Garner, Joel H ; Hickman, Matthew J ; Malega, Ronald W ; Maxwell, Christopher D</creator><contributor>Jackson, Jonathan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Garner, Joel H ; Hickman, Matthew J ; Malega, Ronald W ; Maxwell, Christopher D ; Jackson, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>This research builds on three decades of effort to produce national estimates of the amount and rate of force used by law enforcement officers in the United States. Prior efforts to produce national estimates have suffered from poor and inconsistent measurements of force, small and unrepresentative samples, low survey and/or item response rates, and disparate reporting of rates of force. The present study employs data from a nationally representative survey of state and local law enforcement agencies that has a high survey response rate as well as a relatively high rate of reporting uses of force. Using data on arrests for violent offenses and the number of sworn officers to impute missing data on uses of force, we estimate a total of 337,590 use of physical force incidents among State and local law enforcement agencies during 2012 with a 95 percent confidence interval of +/- 10,470 incidents or +/- 3.1 percent. This article reports the extent to which the number and rate of force incidents vary by the type and size of law enforcement agencies. Our findings demonstrate the willingness of a large proportion of law enforcement agencies to voluntarily report the amount of force used by their officers and the relative strengths and weaknesses of the Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) program to produce nationally representative information about police behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192932</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29447295</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Confidence intervals ; Consortia ; Criminal investigation ; Criminal investigations ; Deadly force ; Demographic aspects ; Departments ; Enforcement ; Engineering and Technology ; Estimates ; Jurisdiction ; Law enforcement ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Missing data ; Murders &amp; murder attempts ; People and Places ; Police ; Politics ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social research ; Social Sciences ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Studies ; Task forces</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e0192932-e0192932</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Garner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Garner et al 2018 Garner et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-42bdc85e72953a44748db57069a90f08e023a342580bd83cce41273141a2d9693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-42bdc85e72953a44748db57069a90f08e023a342580bd83cce41273141a2d9693</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2651-685X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2002481196/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2002481196?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29447295$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Jackson, Jonathan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Garner, Joel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hickman, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malega, Ronald W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><title>Progress toward national estimates of police use of force</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>This research builds on three decades of effort to produce national estimates of the amount and rate of force used by law enforcement officers in the United States. Prior efforts to produce national estimates have suffered from poor and inconsistent measurements of force, small and unrepresentative samples, low survey and/or item response rates, and disparate reporting of rates of force. The present study employs data from a nationally representative survey of state and local law enforcement agencies that has a high survey response rate as well as a relatively high rate of reporting uses of force. Using data on arrests for violent offenses and the number of sworn officers to impute missing data on uses of force, we estimate a total of 337,590 use of physical force incidents among State and local law enforcement agencies during 2012 with a 95 percent confidence interval of +/- 10,470 incidents or +/- 3.1 percent. This article reports the extent to which the number and rate of force incidents vary by the type and size of law enforcement agencies. Our findings demonstrate the willingness of a large proportion of law enforcement agencies to voluntarily report the amount of force used by their officers and the relative strengths and weaknesses of the Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) program to produce nationally representative information about police behavior.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Criminal investigation</subject><subject>Criminal investigations</subject><subject>Deadly force</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Missing data</subject><subject>Murders &amp; murder attempts</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Task forces</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNktmKFDEUhgtRnHH0DUQLBNGLbk-WWnIjDINLw8CI221IZelOk660Scrl7U1N1wxdMheSi2zf-U_OyV8UTxEsEWnQm60fQi_ccu97vQTEMCP4XnGK8rSoMZD7R-uT4lGMW4CKtHX9sDjBjNIGs-q0YJ-CXwcdY5n8LxFU2YtkfdYtdUx2J5KOpTfl3jsrdTlEPe6MD1I_Lh4Y4aJ-Ms1nxbf3775efFxcXn1YXZxfLmTNcFpQ3CnZVnpMR0ROS1vVVQ3UTDAw0GrARBCKqxY61RIpNUW4IYgigRWrGTkrnh90985HPlUdOQbAtEWI1ZlYHQjlxZbvQ352-MO9sPz6wIc1FyFZ6TRXCIORFTOKAWUAwmBQAhBWtewUU1nr7ZRt6HZaSd2nINxMdH7T2w1f-5-8ahFhLWSBV5NA8D-G3ES-s1Fq50Sv_XD9bgKkIqzJ6It_0Lurm6i1yAXY3vicV46i_LzCTUMIo6PW8g4qD6V3VmaLGJvPZwGvZwGZSfp3WoshRr768vn_2avvc_blEbvRwqVN9G4YXRXnID2AMvgYgza3TUbAR4ffdIOPDueTw3PYs-MPug26sTT5C37B87M</recordid><startdate>20180215</startdate><enddate>20180215</enddate><creator>Garner, Joel H</creator><creator>Hickman, Matthew J</creator><creator>Malega, Ronald W</creator><creator>Maxwell, Christopher D</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2651-685X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180215</creationdate><title>Progress toward national estimates of police use of force</title><author>Garner, Joel H ; Hickman, Matthew J ; Malega, Ronald W ; Maxwell, Christopher D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-42bdc85e72953a44748db57069a90f08e023a342580bd83cce41273141a2d9693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Criminal investigation</topic><topic>Criminal investigations</topic><topic>Deadly force</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Missing data</topic><topic>Murders &amp; murder attempts</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Task forces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garner, Joel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hickman, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malega, Ronald W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garner, Joel H</au><au>Hickman, Matthew J</au><au>Malega, Ronald W</au><au>Maxwell, Christopher D</au><au>Jackson, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Progress toward national estimates of police use of force</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-02-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0192932</spage><epage>e0192932</epage><pages>e0192932-e0192932</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This research builds on three decades of effort to produce national estimates of the amount and rate of force used by law enforcement officers in the United States. Prior efforts to produce national estimates have suffered from poor and inconsistent measurements of force, small and unrepresentative samples, low survey and/or item response rates, and disparate reporting of rates of force. The present study employs data from a nationally representative survey of state and local law enforcement agencies that has a high survey response rate as well as a relatively high rate of reporting uses of force. Using data on arrests for violent offenses and the number of sworn officers to impute missing data on uses of force, we estimate a total of 337,590 use of physical force incidents among State and local law enforcement agencies during 2012 with a 95 percent confidence interval of +/- 10,470 incidents or +/- 3.1 percent. This article reports the extent to which the number and rate of force incidents vary by the type and size of law enforcement agencies. Our findings demonstrate the willingness of a large proportion of law enforcement agencies to voluntarily report the amount of force used by their officers and the relative strengths and weaknesses of the Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) program to produce nationally representative information about police behavior.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29447295</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0192932</doi><tpages>e0192932</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2651-685X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2018-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e0192932-e0192932
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2002481196
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Analysis
Confidence intervals
Consortia
Criminal investigation
Criminal investigations
Deadly force
Demographic aspects
Departments
Enforcement
Engineering and Technology
Estimates
Jurisdiction
Law enforcement
Laws, regulations and rules
Medicine and Health Sciences
Missing data
Murders & murder attempts
People and Places
Police
Politics
Research and Analysis Methods
Social research
Social Sciences
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Studies
Task forces
title Progress toward national estimates of police use of force
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A47%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Progress%20toward%20national%20estimates%20of%20police%20use%20of%20force&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Garner,%20Joel%20H&rft.date=2018-02-15&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0192932&rft.epage=e0192932&rft.pages=e0192932-e0192932&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0192932&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA527733947%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-42bdc85e72953a44748db57069a90f08e023a342580bd83cce41273141a2d9693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002481196&rft_id=info:pmid/29447295&rft_galeid=A527733947&rfr_iscdi=true