Loading…
Bifidobacteria isolated from vaginal and gut microbiomes are indistinguishable by comparative genomics
Bifidobacteria colonize the human gastrointestinal tract, vagina, oral cavity and breast milk. They influence human physiology and nutrition through health-promoting effects, play an important role as primary colonizers of the newborn gut, and contribute to vaginal microbiome homeostasis by producin...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0196290-e0196290 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-40c0d15ff5d97a15f3f84d967acb8e4e00e3d28a830b6e46827568084e5d19c63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-40c0d15ff5d97a15f3f84d967acb8e4e00e3d28a830b6e46827568084e5d19c63 |
container_end_page | e0196290 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e0196290 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Freitas, Aline C Hill, Janet E |
description | Bifidobacteria colonize the human gastrointestinal tract, vagina, oral cavity and breast milk. They influence human physiology and nutrition through health-promoting effects, play an important role as primary colonizers of the newborn gut, and contribute to vaginal microbiome homeostasis by producing lactic acid. Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which bifidobacteria are transmitted from mother to infant remains in discussion. Moreover, studies have suggested that Bifidobacterium spp. have specializations for gut colonization, but comparisons of strains of the same bifidobacteria species from different body sites are lacking. Here, our objective was to compare the genomes of Bifidobacterium breve (n = 17) and Bifidobacterium longum (n = 26) to assess whether gut and vaginal isolates of either species were distinguishable based on genome content. Comparison of the general genome features showed that vaginal and gut isolates did not differ in size, GC content, number of genes and CRISPR, either for B. breve or B. longum. Average nucleotide identity and whole genome phylogeny analysis revealed that vaginal and gut isolates did not cluster separately. Vaginal and gut isolates also had a similar COG (Cluster of Orthologous Group) category distribution. Differences in the accessory genomes between vaginal and gut strains were observed, but were not sufficient to distinguish isolates based on their origin. The results of this study support the hypothesis that the vaginal and gut microbiomes are colonized by a shared community of Bifidobacterium, and further emphasize the potential importance of the maternal vaginal microbiome as a source of infant gut microbiota. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0196290 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2029580408</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A535897383</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8c2338ce5ecc4a3d9e8d0afe21475961</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A535897383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-40c0d15ff5d97a15f3f84d967acb8e4e00e3d28a830b6e46827568084e5d19c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjGnTpOmNsC5-DCws-HUbTpPTTpa2GZN0cP-9qdNdprIX0ouG9Hnftzk5J0meZ2Sd0TJ7d21HN0C33tkB1ySreF6RB8lpVtF8xXNCHx6tT5In3l8Twqjg_HFykldcFITx06T5YBqjbQ0qoDOQGm87CKjTxtk-3UNrYkYKg07bMaS9Uc7WxvboU3CYmkEbH8zQjsZvoe4wrW9SZfsdOAhmj2mLg40i_zR51EDn8dn8Pkt-fPr4_eLL6vLq8-bi_HKlSibCqiCK6Iw1DdNVCXFBG1HoipegaoEFEoJU5wIEJTXHgou8ZFwQUSDTWaU4PUteHnx3nfVyLpGXOckrJkhBRCQ2B0JbuJY7Z3pwN9KCkX83rGsluGBUh1KonFKhkKFSBVBdodAEGsyzomQVz6LX-zltrHvUCofgoFuYLr8MZitbu5esyvKyoNHgzWzg7K8RfZC98Qq7Dga04_TfNCM5J-WU9eof9P7TzVQL8QBmaGzMVZOpPGeUiaqkYopd30PFR2O8rNhPjYn7C8HbhSAyAX-HFkbv5ebb1_9nr34u2ddH7BahC9vYgGMwdvBLsDiAsf-8d9jcFTkjchqH22rIaRzkPA5R9uL4gu5Et_1P_wB8OAY6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2029580408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bifidobacteria isolated from vaginal and gut microbiomes are indistinguishable by comparative genomics</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Freitas, Aline C ; Hill, Janet E</creator><contributor>Gerlach, Roman G.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Aline C ; Hill, Janet E ; Gerlach, Roman G.</creatorcontrib><description>Bifidobacteria colonize the human gastrointestinal tract, vagina, oral cavity and breast milk. They influence human physiology and nutrition through health-promoting effects, play an important role as primary colonizers of the newborn gut, and contribute to vaginal microbiome homeostasis by producing lactic acid. Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which bifidobacteria are transmitted from mother to infant remains in discussion. Moreover, studies have suggested that Bifidobacterium spp. have specializations for gut colonization, but comparisons of strains of the same bifidobacteria species from different body sites are lacking. Here, our objective was to compare the genomes of Bifidobacterium breve (n = 17) and Bifidobacterium longum (n = 26) to assess whether gut and vaginal isolates of either species were distinguishable based on genome content. Comparison of the general genome features showed that vaginal and gut isolates did not differ in size, GC content, number of genes and CRISPR, either for B. breve or B. longum. Average nucleotide identity and whole genome phylogeny analysis revealed that vaginal and gut isolates did not cluster separately. Vaginal and gut isolates also had a similar COG (Cluster of Orthologous Group) category distribution. Differences in the accessory genomes between vaginal and gut strains were observed, but were not sufficient to distinguish isolates based on their origin. The results of this study support the hypothesis that the vaginal and gut microbiomes are colonized by a shared community of Bifidobacterium, and further emphasize the potential importance of the maternal vaginal microbiome as a source of infant gut microbiota.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196290</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29684056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Bacteria ; Bifidobacteria ; Bifidobacterium ; Bifidobacterium breve ; Bifidobacterium longum ; Bioinformatics ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Breast milk ; Breastfeeding & lactation ; Colonization ; CRISPR ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Digestive system ; Digestive tract ; DNA ; Engineering and Technology ; Gastrointestinal tract ; Genetic aspects ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Globular clusters ; Health aspects ; Health promotion ; Homeostasis ; Identification and classification ; Immune system ; Infants ; Intestinal microflora ; Lactic acid ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Nutrition ; Oral cavity ; Phylogeny ; Physiological aspects ; Studies ; Vagina ; Yogurt</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0196290-e0196290</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Freitas, Hill. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Freitas, Hill 2018 Freitas, Hill</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-40c0d15ff5d97a15f3f84d967acb8e4e00e3d28a830b6e46827568084e5d19c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-40c0d15ff5d97a15f3f84d967acb8e4e00e3d28a830b6e46827568084e5d19c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2187-6277</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2029580408/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2029580408?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29684056$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gerlach, Roman G.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Aline C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Janet E</creatorcontrib><title>Bifidobacteria isolated from vaginal and gut microbiomes are indistinguishable by comparative genomics</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Bifidobacteria colonize the human gastrointestinal tract, vagina, oral cavity and breast milk. They influence human physiology and nutrition through health-promoting effects, play an important role as primary colonizers of the newborn gut, and contribute to vaginal microbiome homeostasis by producing lactic acid. Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which bifidobacteria are transmitted from mother to infant remains in discussion. Moreover, studies have suggested that Bifidobacterium spp. have specializations for gut colonization, but comparisons of strains of the same bifidobacteria species from different body sites are lacking. Here, our objective was to compare the genomes of Bifidobacterium breve (n = 17) and Bifidobacterium longum (n = 26) to assess whether gut and vaginal isolates of either species were distinguishable based on genome content. Comparison of the general genome features showed that vaginal and gut isolates did not differ in size, GC content, number of genes and CRISPR, either for B. breve or B. longum. Average nucleotide identity and whole genome phylogeny analysis revealed that vaginal and gut isolates did not cluster separately. Vaginal and gut isolates also had a similar COG (Cluster of Orthologous Group) category distribution. Differences in the accessory genomes between vaginal and gut strains were observed, but were not sufficient to distinguish isolates based on their origin. The results of this study support the hypothesis that the vaginal and gut microbiomes are colonized by a shared community of Bifidobacterium, and further emphasize the potential importance of the maternal vaginal microbiome as a source of infant gut microbiota.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bifidobacteria</subject><subject>Bifidobacterium</subject><subject>Bifidobacterium breve</subject><subject>Bifidobacterium longum</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Breast milk</subject><subject>Breastfeeding & lactation</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>CRISPR</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Digestive tract</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal tract</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Globular clusters</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Homeostasis</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Lactic acid</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Oral cavity</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Yogurt</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgujFjGnTpOmNsC5-DCws-HUbTpPTTpa2GZN0cP-9qdNdprIX0ouG9Hnftzk5J0meZ2Sd0TJ7d21HN0C33tkB1ySreF6RB8lpVtF8xXNCHx6tT5In3l8Twqjg_HFykldcFITx06T5YBqjbQ0qoDOQGm87CKjTxtk-3UNrYkYKg07bMaS9Uc7WxvboU3CYmkEbH8zQjsZvoe4wrW9SZfsdOAhmj2mLg40i_zR51EDn8dn8Pkt-fPr4_eLL6vLq8-bi_HKlSibCqiCK6Iw1DdNVCXFBG1HoipegaoEFEoJU5wIEJTXHgou8ZFwQUSDTWaU4PUteHnx3nfVyLpGXOckrJkhBRCQ2B0JbuJY7Z3pwN9KCkX83rGsluGBUh1KonFKhkKFSBVBdodAEGsyzomQVz6LX-zltrHvUCofgoFuYLr8MZitbu5esyvKyoNHgzWzg7K8RfZC98Qq7Dga04_TfNCM5J-WU9eof9P7TzVQL8QBmaGzMVZOpPGeUiaqkYopd30PFR2O8rNhPjYn7C8HbhSAyAX-HFkbv5ebb1_9nr34u2ddH7BahC9vYgGMwdvBLsDiAsf-8d9jcFTkjchqH22rIaRzkPA5R9uL4gu5Et_1P_wB8OAY6</recordid><startdate>20180423</startdate><enddate>20180423</enddate><creator>Freitas, Aline C</creator><creator>Hill, Janet E</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2187-6277</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180423</creationdate><title>Bifidobacteria isolated from vaginal and gut microbiomes are indistinguishable by comparative genomics</title><author>Freitas, Aline C ; Hill, Janet E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-40c0d15ff5d97a15f3f84d967acb8e4e00e3d28a830b6e46827568084e5d19c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bifidobacteria</topic><topic>Bifidobacterium</topic><topic>Bifidobacterium breve</topic><topic>Bifidobacterium longum</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Breast milk</topic><topic>Breastfeeding & lactation</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>CRISPR</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Digestive tract</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal tract</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Globular clusters</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Homeostasis</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Lactic acid</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Oral cavity</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Yogurt</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Aline C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Janet E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freitas, Aline C</au><au>Hill, Janet E</au><au>Gerlach, Roman G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bifidobacteria isolated from vaginal and gut microbiomes are indistinguishable by comparative genomics</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-04-23</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0196290</spage><epage>e0196290</epage><pages>e0196290-e0196290</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Bifidobacteria colonize the human gastrointestinal tract, vagina, oral cavity and breast milk. They influence human physiology and nutrition through health-promoting effects, play an important role as primary colonizers of the newborn gut, and contribute to vaginal microbiome homeostasis by producing lactic acid. Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which bifidobacteria are transmitted from mother to infant remains in discussion. Moreover, studies have suggested that Bifidobacterium spp. have specializations for gut colonization, but comparisons of strains of the same bifidobacteria species from different body sites are lacking. Here, our objective was to compare the genomes of Bifidobacterium breve (n = 17) and Bifidobacterium longum (n = 26) to assess whether gut and vaginal isolates of either species were distinguishable based on genome content. Comparison of the general genome features showed that vaginal and gut isolates did not differ in size, GC content, number of genes and CRISPR, either for B. breve or B. longum. Average nucleotide identity and whole genome phylogeny analysis revealed that vaginal and gut isolates did not cluster separately. Vaginal and gut isolates also had a similar COG (Cluster of Orthologous Group) category distribution. Differences in the accessory genomes between vaginal and gut strains were observed, but were not sufficient to distinguish isolates based on their origin. The results of this study support the hypothesis that the vaginal and gut microbiomes are colonized by a shared community of Bifidobacterium, and further emphasize the potential importance of the maternal vaginal microbiome as a source of infant gut microbiota.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29684056</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0196290</doi><tpages>e0196290</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2187-6277</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0196290-e0196290 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2029580408 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adaptation Bacteria Bifidobacteria Bifidobacterium Bifidobacterium breve Bifidobacterium longum Bioinformatics Biology and Life Sciences Breast milk Breastfeeding & lactation Colonization CRISPR Deoxyribonucleic acid Digestive system Digestive tract DNA Engineering and Technology Gastrointestinal tract Genetic aspects Genomes Genomics Globular clusters Health aspects Health promotion Homeostasis Identification and classification Immune system Infants Intestinal microflora Lactic acid Medicine and Health Sciences Microbiomes Microbiota Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) Nutrition Oral cavity Phylogeny Physiological aspects Studies Vagina Yogurt |
title | Bifidobacteria isolated from vaginal and gut microbiomes are indistinguishable by comparative genomics |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A00%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bifidobacteria%20isolated%20from%20vaginal%20and%20gut%20microbiomes%20are%20indistinguishable%20by%20comparative%20genomics&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Freitas,%20Aline%20C&rft.date=2018-04-23&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0196290&rft.epage=e0196290&rft.pages=e0196290-e0196290&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0196290&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA535897383%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-40c0d15ff5d97a15f3f84d967acb8e4e00e3d28a830b6e46827568084e5d19c63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2029580408&rft_id=info:pmid/29684056&rft_galeid=A535897383&rfr_iscdi=true |