Factors affecting the number and type of student research products for chemistry and physics students at primarily undergraduate institutions: A case study

For undergraduate students, involvement in authentic research represents scholarship that is consistent with disciplinary quality standards and provides an integrative learning experience. In conjunction with performing research, the communication of the results via presentations or publications is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0196338-e0196338
Main Authors: Mellis, Birgit, Soto, Patricia, Bruce, Chrystal D, Lacueva, Graciela, Wilson, Anne M, Jayasekare, Rasitha
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Advisors
Author productivity
Authorship
Bibliometrics
Case studies
Chemistry
College students
Empirical analysis
Engineering
Gender differences
Higher education
Learning
Longitudinal studies
People and Places
Physical Sciences
Physics
Publication output
Quality standards
Research and Analysis Methods
Science Policy
Scientific papers
Scientists
Scientometrics
Sexism
Social Sciences
Statistical analysis
Statistical models
STEM education
Stereotypes
Students
Studies
Training
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-82cfb757b549694ae832b1525a4d171cb17bf5bc49d26de40267b6e2c0a1d3223
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-82cfb757b549694ae832b1525a4d171cb17bf5bc49d26de40267b6e2c0a1d3223
container_end_page e0196338
container_issue 4
container_start_page e0196338
container_title PloS one
container_volume 13
creator Mellis, Birgit
Soto, Patricia
Bruce, Chrystal D
Lacueva, Graciela
Wilson, Anne M
Jayasekare, Rasitha
description For undergraduate students, involvement in authentic research represents scholarship that is consistent with disciplinary quality standards and provides an integrative learning experience. In conjunction with performing research, the communication of the results via presentations or publications is a measure of the level of scientific engagement. The empirical study presented here uses generalized linear mixed models with hierarchical bootstrapping to examine the factors that impact the means of dissemination of undergraduate research results. Focusing on the research experiences in physics and chemistry of undergraduates at four Primarily Undergraduate Institutions (PUIs) from 2004-2013, statistical analysis indicates that the gender of the student does not impact the number and type of research products. However, in chemistry, the rank of the faculty advisor and the venue of the presentation do impact the number of research products by undergraduate student, whereas in physics, gender match between student and advisor has an effect on the number of undergraduate research products. This study provides a baseline for future studies of discipline-based bibliometrics and factors that affect the number of research products of undergraduate students.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0196338
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2031410662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A536332687</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_85034925d3614152801c60ce16188f7e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A536332687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-82cfb757b549694ae832b1525a4d171cb17bf5bc49d26de40267b6e2c0a1d3223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgujFjPlo09YLYVhcHVhY8Os2pMlpm6XTjEkq9rf4Z83MdJap7IX0oiV93jc5b85JkucELwnLybtbO7hedsut7WGJSckZKx4k56RkdMEpZg9Pvs-SJ97fYpyxgvPHyRkteVlkmJ4nf66kCtZ5JOsaVDB9g0ILqB82FTgke43CuAVka-TDoKEPyIEH6VSLts7qQQWPauuQamFjfHDjXrNtR2-UP2qie4i42UhnuhENvQbXOKkHGQCZ3gcThmBs79-jFVLSw144Pk0e1bLz8Gx6XyTfrz5-u_y8uL75tL5cXS8UL2lYFFTVVZ7lVZbGslIJBaMVyWgmU01yoiqSV3VWqbTUlGtIMeV5xYEqLIlmlLKL5OXBd9tZL6ZcvYi5kZRgznfE-kBoK2_FoZJRWGnEfsG6RkgXjOpAxFhZWtJMMx7VGS0wURwrIJwURZ1D9Pow7TZUG9Aq5uNkNzOd_-lNKxr7S2QlKdP9Yd5MBs7-HMAHEZNX0HWyBzvsz01ZWVCaR_TVP-j91U1UI2MBpq9t3FftTMUqY7GvKC92Xst7qPjoePMqNmFt4vpM8HYmiEyA36GRg_di_fXL_7M3P-bs6xO2BdmF1tvu0EFzMD2AylnvHdR3IRMsdjN0TEPsZkhMMxRlL04v6E50HBr2F7FLGOE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2031410662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors affecting the number and type of student research products for chemistry and physics students at primarily undergraduate institutions: A case study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mellis, Birgit ; Soto, Patricia ; Bruce, Chrystal D ; Lacueva, Graciela ; Wilson, Anne M ; Jayasekare, Rasitha</creator><contributor>Larivière, Vincent</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mellis, Birgit ; Soto, Patricia ; Bruce, Chrystal D ; Lacueva, Graciela ; Wilson, Anne M ; Jayasekare, Rasitha ; Larivière, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>For undergraduate students, involvement in authentic research represents scholarship that is consistent with disciplinary quality standards and provides an integrative learning experience. In conjunction with performing research, the communication of the results via presentations or publications is a measure of the level of scientific engagement. The empirical study presented here uses generalized linear mixed models with hierarchical bootstrapping to examine the factors that impact the means of dissemination of undergraduate research results. Focusing on the research experiences in physics and chemistry of undergraduates at four Primarily Undergraduate Institutions (PUIs) from 2004-2013, statistical analysis indicates that the gender of the student does not impact the number and type of research products. However, in chemistry, the rank of the faculty advisor and the venue of the presentation do impact the number of research products by undergraduate student, whereas in physics, gender match between student and advisor has an effect on the number of undergraduate research products. This study provides a baseline for future studies of discipline-based bibliometrics and factors that affect the number of research products of undergraduate students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196338</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29698502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Advisors ; Author productivity ; Authorship ; Bibliometrics ; Case studies ; Chemistry ; College students ; Empirical analysis ; Engineering ; Gender differences ; Higher education ; Learning ; Longitudinal studies ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Physics ; Publication output ; Quality standards ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Science Policy ; Scientific papers ; Scientists ; Scientometrics ; Sexism ; Social Sciences ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical models ; STEM education ; Stereotypes ; Students ; Studies ; Training</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0196338-e0196338</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Mellis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Mellis et al 2018 Mellis et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-82cfb757b549694ae832b1525a4d171cb17bf5bc49d26de40267b6e2c0a1d3223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-82cfb757b549694ae832b1525a4d171cb17bf5bc49d26de40267b6e2c0a1d3223</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7940-0266</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2031410662/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2031410662?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,74998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29698502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Larivière, Vincent</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mellis, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soto, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruce, Chrystal D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacueva, Graciela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayasekare, Rasitha</creatorcontrib><title>Factors affecting the number and type of student research products for chemistry and physics students at primarily undergraduate institutions: A case study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>For undergraduate students, involvement in authentic research represents scholarship that is consistent with disciplinary quality standards and provides an integrative learning experience. In conjunction with performing research, the communication of the results via presentations or publications is a measure of the level of scientific engagement. The empirical study presented here uses generalized linear mixed models with hierarchical bootstrapping to examine the factors that impact the means of dissemination of undergraduate research results. Focusing on the research experiences in physics and chemistry of undergraduates at four Primarily Undergraduate Institutions (PUIs) from 2004-2013, statistical analysis indicates that the gender of the student does not impact the number and type of research products. However, in chemistry, the rank of the faculty advisor and the venue of the presentation do impact the number of research products by undergraduate student, whereas in physics, gender match between student and advisor has an effect on the number of undergraduate research products. This study provides a baseline for future studies of discipline-based bibliometrics and factors that affect the number of research products of undergraduate students.</description><subject>Advisors</subject><subject>Author productivity</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Publication output</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Scientific papers</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Scientometrics</subject><subject>Sexism</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>STEM education</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgujFjPlo09YLYVhcHVhY8Os2pMlpm6XTjEkq9rf4Z83MdJap7IX0oiV93jc5b85JkucELwnLybtbO7hedsut7WGJSckZKx4k56RkdMEpZg9Pvs-SJ97fYpyxgvPHyRkteVlkmJ4nf66kCtZ5JOsaVDB9g0ILqB82FTgke43CuAVka-TDoKEPyIEH6VSLts7qQQWPauuQamFjfHDjXrNtR2-UP2qie4i42UhnuhENvQbXOKkHGQCZ3gcThmBs79-jFVLSw144Pk0e1bLz8Gx6XyTfrz5-u_y8uL75tL5cXS8UL2lYFFTVVZ7lVZbGslIJBaMVyWgmU01yoiqSV3VWqbTUlGtIMeV5xYEqLIlmlLKL5OXBd9tZL6ZcvYi5kZRgznfE-kBoK2_FoZJRWGnEfsG6RkgXjOpAxFhZWtJMMx7VGS0wURwrIJwURZ1D9Pow7TZUG9Aq5uNkNzOd_-lNKxr7S2QlKdP9Yd5MBs7-HMAHEZNX0HWyBzvsz01ZWVCaR_TVP-j91U1UI2MBpq9t3FftTMUqY7GvKC92Xst7qPjoePMqNmFt4vpM8HYmiEyA36GRg_di_fXL_7M3P-bs6xO2BdmF1tvu0EFzMD2AylnvHdR3IRMsdjN0TEPsZkhMMxRlL04v6E50HBr2F7FLGOE</recordid><startdate>20180426</startdate><enddate>20180426</enddate><creator>Mellis, Birgit</creator><creator>Soto, Patricia</creator><creator>Bruce, Chrystal D</creator><creator>Lacueva, Graciela</creator><creator>Wilson, Anne M</creator><creator>Jayasekare, Rasitha</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7940-0266</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180426</creationdate><title>Factors affecting the number and type of student research products for chemistry and physics students at primarily undergraduate institutions: A case study</title><author>Mellis, Birgit ; Soto, Patricia ; Bruce, Chrystal D ; Lacueva, Graciela ; Wilson, Anne M ; Jayasekare, Rasitha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-82cfb757b549694ae832b1525a4d171cb17bf5bc49d26de40267b6e2c0a1d3223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Advisors</topic><topic>Author productivity</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Publication output</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Scientific papers</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Scientometrics</topic><topic>Sexism</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>STEM education</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mellis, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soto, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruce, Chrystal D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacueva, Graciela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayasekare, Rasitha</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Science (Gale in Context)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mellis, Birgit</au><au>Soto, Patricia</au><au>Bruce, Chrystal D</au><au>Lacueva, Graciela</au><au>Wilson, Anne M</au><au>Jayasekare, Rasitha</au><au>Larivière, Vincent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors affecting the number and type of student research products for chemistry and physics students at primarily undergraduate institutions: A case study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-04-26</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0196338</spage><epage>e0196338</epage><pages>e0196338-e0196338</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>For undergraduate students, involvement in authentic research represents scholarship that is consistent with disciplinary quality standards and provides an integrative learning experience. In conjunction with performing research, the communication of the results via presentations or publications is a measure of the level of scientific engagement. The empirical study presented here uses generalized linear mixed models with hierarchical bootstrapping to examine the factors that impact the means of dissemination of undergraduate research results. Focusing on the research experiences in physics and chemistry of undergraduates at four Primarily Undergraduate Institutions (PUIs) from 2004-2013, statistical analysis indicates that the gender of the student does not impact the number and type of research products. However, in chemistry, the rank of the faculty advisor and the venue of the presentation do impact the number of research products by undergraduate student, whereas in physics, gender match between student and advisor has an effect on the number of undergraduate research products. This study provides a baseline for future studies of discipline-based bibliometrics and factors that affect the number of research products of undergraduate students.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29698502</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0196338</doi><tpages>e0196338</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7940-0266</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2018-04, Vol.13 (4), p.e0196338-e0196338
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2031410662
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Advisors
Author productivity
Authorship
Bibliometrics
Case studies
Chemistry
College students
Empirical analysis
Engineering
Gender differences
Higher education
Learning
Longitudinal studies
People and Places
Physical Sciences
Physics
Publication output
Quality standards
Research and Analysis Methods
Science Policy
Scientific papers
Scientists
Scientometrics
Sexism
Social Sciences
Statistical analysis
Statistical models
STEM education
Stereotypes
Students
Studies
Training
title Factors affecting the number and type of student research products for chemistry and physics students at primarily undergraduate institutions: A case study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A13%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20affecting%20the%20number%20and%20type%20of%20student%20research%20products%20for%20chemistry%20and%20physics%20students%20at%20primarily%20undergraduate%20institutions:%20A%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Mellis,%20Birgit&rft.date=2018-04-26&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0196338&rft.epage=e0196338&rft.pages=e0196338-e0196338&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0196338&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA536332687%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-82cfb757b549694ae832b1525a4d171cb17bf5bc49d26de40267b6e2c0a1d3223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2031410662&rft_id=info:pmid/29698502&rft_galeid=A536332687&rfr_iscdi=true