Dynamics and control of sister kinetochore behavior during the meiotic divisions in Drosophila spermatocytes

• Published in: PLoS genetics 2018-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e1007372-e1007372
• Main Authors: Chaurasia, Soumya, Lehner, Christian F
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anaphase; Anaphase-promoting complex; Animals; Biology and Life Sciences; Chromatin; Chromosomes; Divisions; Drosophila; Drosophila melanogaster; Females; Genetic aspects; Insects; Kinetochores; Life sciences; Medicine and Health Sciences; Meiosis; Metaphase; Microtubules; Molecular modelling; Physiological aspects; Research and Analysis Methods; Spatial discrimination; Spermatocytes; Yeast
• ISSN: 1553-7404; 1553-7390; 1553-7404
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007372

Sister kinetochores are connected to the same spindle pole during meiosis I and to opposite poles during meiosis II. The molecular mechanisms controlling the distinct behavior of sister kinetochores during the two meiotic divisions are poorly understood. To study kinetochore behavior during meiosis, we have optimized time lapse imaging with Drosophila spermatocytes, enabling kinetochore tracking with high temporal and spatial resolution through both meiotic divisions. The correct bipolar orientation of chromosomes within the spindle proceeds rapidly during both divisions. Stable bi-orientation of the last chromosome is achieved within ten minutes after the onset of kinetochore-microtubule interactions. Our analyses of mnm and tef mutants, where univalents instead of bivalents are present during meiosis I, indicate that the high efficiency of normal bi-orientation depends on pronounced stabilization of kinetochore attachments to spindle microtubules by the mechanical tension generated by spindle forces upon bi-orientation. Except for occasional brief separation episodes, sister kinetochores are so closely associated that they cannot be resolved individually by light microscopy during meiosis I, interkinesis and at the start of meiosis II. Permanent evident separation of sister kinetochores during M II depends on spindle forces resulting from bi-orientation. In mnm and tef mutants, sister kinetochore separation can be observed already during meiosis I in bi-oriented univalents. Interestingly, however, this sister kinetochore separation is delayed until the metaphase to anaphase transition and depends on the Fzy/Cdc20 activator of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. We propose that univalent bi-orientation in mnm and tef mutants exposes a release of sister kinetochore conjunction that occurs also during normal meiosis I in preparation for bi-orientation of dyads during meiosis II.