Loading…
In the real world, people prefer their last whisky when tasting options in a long sequence
When people in laboratory studies sample products in a sequence, they tend to prefer options presented first and last. To what extent do these primacy and recency effects carry over to real-world settings where numerous sources of information determine preferences? To investigate this question, we c...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2018-08, Vol.13 (8), p.e0202732-e0202732 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1b1ec5688dd18814c0d8958c445282e7d528fc125186b76afcd8379d00eb37f73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1b1ec5688dd18814c0d8958c445282e7d528fc125186b76afcd8379d00eb37f73 |
container_end_page | e0202732 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e0202732 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Quigley-McBride, Adele Franco, Gregory McLaren, Daniel Bruce Mantonakis, Antonia Garry, Maryanne |
description | When people in laboratory studies sample products in a sequence, they tend to prefer options presented first and last. To what extent do these primacy and recency effects carry over to real-world settings where numerous sources of information determine preferences? To investigate this question, we coded archival data from 136 actual whisky tastings each featuring seven whiskies. We analyzed people's ratings of whiskies featured at different serial positions in the tastings. We found a recency effect: people gave their highest rating to whiskies in the last position, and voted the last whisky as their favorite more frequently. This recency effect persisted when we controlled for the counter explanation that whiskies with higher alcohol content tended to occupy later serial positions. The recency effect also persisted when we controlled for the age of the whiskies. Taken together, our findings suggest that the order of presentation matters in real-world settings, closely resembling what happens in laboratory settings with longer sequences of options. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0202732 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2090277217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A550931794</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c87845a1683c40fbbf6f2cab8792d7f9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A550931794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1b1ec5688dd18814c0d8958c445282e7d528fc125186b76afcd8379d00eb37f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7kW_gWhAEAVnzKVN0hdhWbwMLCx4e_AlpGkykzGT1KTddb-9mZnuMpV9kD6ccvI7_yQn_1MUzxCcI8LQu3UYopdu3gWv5xBDzAh-UByjmuAZxZA8PPg_Kk5SWkNYEU7p4-KIQIQrgshx8XPhQb_SIGrpwHWIrn0LOh06p0EXtdFxu2ojcDL14Hpl06-bHHQuygnrlyB0vQ0-AeuBBC7kTNK_B-2VflI8MtIl_XSMp8X3jx--nX-eXVx-WpyfXcwUrXE_Qw3SqqKcty3iHJUKtryuuCrLCnOsWZuDUfm8iNOGUWlUywmrWwh1Q5hh5LR4sdftXEhibEsSGNa5JwyjLbHYE22Qa9FFu5HxRgRpxS4R4lLI2FvltFCc8bKSiHKiSmiaxlCDlWw4q3HLTJ213o-7Dc1Gt0r7Pko3EZ2ueLsSy3AlKIKoRCgLvB4FYsiNSr3Y2KS0c9LrMOzOjTDBmJKMvvwHvf92I7WU-QLWm5D3VVtRcVZVsCaI1WWm5vdQ-Wv1xqrsIWNzflLwZlKQmV7_6ZdySEksvn75f_byx5R9dcCusu_6VQpu2NloCpZ7UMWQUjbjXZMRFNsRuO2G2I6AGEcglz0_fKC7olvPk7-c_f_E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2090277217</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In the real world, people prefer their last whisky when tasting options in a long sequence</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Quigley-McBride, Adele ; Franco, Gregory ; McLaren, Daniel Bruce ; Mantonakis, Antonia ; Garry, Maryanne</creator><contributor>Capraro, Valerio</contributor><creatorcontrib>Quigley-McBride, Adele ; Franco, Gregory ; McLaren, Daniel Bruce ; Mantonakis, Antonia ; Garry, Maryanne ; Capraro, Valerio</creatorcontrib><description>When people in laboratory studies sample products in a sequence, they tend to prefer options presented first and last. To what extent do these primacy and recency effects carry over to real-world settings where numerous sources of information determine preferences? To investigate this question, we coded archival data from 136 actual whisky tastings each featuring seven whiskies. We analyzed people's ratings of whiskies featured at different serial positions in the tastings. We found a recency effect: people gave their highest rating to whiskies in the last position, and voted the last whisky as their favorite more frequently. This recency effect persisted when we controlled for the counter explanation that whiskies with higher alcohol content tended to occupy later serial positions. The recency effect also persisted when we controlled for the age of the whiskies. Taken together, our findings suggest that the order of presentation matters in real-world settings, closely resembling what happens in laboratory settings with longer sequences of options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202732</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30125313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alcoholic Beverages - analysis ; Alcohols ; Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Decision making ; Field study ; Humans ; Influence ; Laboratories ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Memory ; Physical Sciences ; Preferences ; Psychology ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Serial Learning ; Social Sciences ; Taste - physiology ; Whiskey ; Whisky ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-08, Vol.13 (8), p.e0202732-e0202732</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Quigley-McBride et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Quigley-McBride et al 2018 Quigley-McBride et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1b1ec5688dd18814c0d8958c445282e7d528fc125186b76afcd8379d00eb37f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1b1ec5688dd18814c0d8958c445282e7d528fc125186b76afcd8379d00eb37f73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6267-8472</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2090277217/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2090277217?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30125313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Capraro, Valerio</contributor><creatorcontrib>Quigley-McBride, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaren, Daniel Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mantonakis, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garry, Maryanne</creatorcontrib><title>In the real world, people prefer their last whisky when tasting options in a long sequence</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>When people in laboratory studies sample products in a sequence, they tend to prefer options presented first and last. To what extent do these primacy and recency effects carry over to real-world settings where numerous sources of information determine preferences? To investigate this question, we coded archival data from 136 actual whisky tastings each featuring seven whiskies. We analyzed people's ratings of whiskies featured at different serial positions in the tastings. We found a recency effect: people gave their highest rating to whiskies in the last position, and voted the last whisky as their favorite more frequently. This recency effect persisted when we controlled for the counter explanation that whiskies with higher alcohol content tended to occupy later serial positions. The recency effect also persisted when we controlled for the age of the whiskies. Taken together, our findings suggest that the order of presentation matters in real-world settings, closely resembling what happens in laboratory settings with longer sequences of options.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alcoholic Beverages - analysis</subject><subject>Alcohols</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Serial Learning</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Taste - physiology</subject><subject>Whiskey</subject><subject>Whisky</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7kW_gWhAEAVnzKVN0hdhWbwMLCx4e_AlpGkykzGT1KTddb-9mZnuMpV9kD6ccvI7_yQn_1MUzxCcI8LQu3UYopdu3gWv5xBDzAh-UByjmuAZxZA8PPg_Kk5SWkNYEU7p4-KIQIQrgshx8XPhQb_SIGrpwHWIrn0LOh06p0EXtdFxu2ojcDL14Hpl06-bHHQuygnrlyB0vQ0-AeuBBC7kTNK_B-2VflI8MtIl_XSMp8X3jx--nX-eXVx-WpyfXcwUrXE_Qw3SqqKcty3iHJUKtryuuCrLCnOsWZuDUfm8iNOGUWlUywmrWwh1Q5hh5LR4sdftXEhibEsSGNa5JwyjLbHYE22Qa9FFu5HxRgRpxS4R4lLI2FvltFCc8bKSiHKiSmiaxlCDlWw4q3HLTJ213o-7Dc1Gt0r7Pko3EZ2ueLsSy3AlKIKoRCgLvB4FYsiNSr3Y2KS0c9LrMOzOjTDBmJKMvvwHvf92I7WU-QLWm5D3VVtRcVZVsCaI1WWm5vdQ-Wv1xqrsIWNzflLwZlKQmV7_6ZdySEksvn75f_byx5R9dcCusu_6VQpu2NloCpZ7UMWQUjbjXZMRFNsRuO2G2I6AGEcglz0_fKC7olvPk7-c_f_E</recordid><startdate>20180820</startdate><enddate>20180820</enddate><creator>Quigley-McBride, Adele</creator><creator>Franco, Gregory</creator><creator>McLaren, Daniel Bruce</creator><creator>Mantonakis, Antonia</creator><creator>Garry, Maryanne</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-8472</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180820</creationdate><title>In the real world, people prefer their last whisky when tasting options in a long sequence</title><author>Quigley-McBride, Adele ; Franco, Gregory ; McLaren, Daniel Bruce ; Mantonakis, Antonia ; Garry, Maryanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1b1ec5688dd18814c0d8958c445282e7d528fc125186b76afcd8379d00eb37f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alcoholic Beverages - analysis</topic><topic>Alcohols</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Serial Learning</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Taste - physiology</topic><topic>Whiskey</topic><topic>Whisky</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quigley-McBride, Adele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaren, Daniel Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mantonakis, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garry, Maryanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quigley-McBride, Adele</au><au>Franco, Gregory</au><au>McLaren, Daniel Bruce</au><au>Mantonakis, Antonia</au><au>Garry, Maryanne</au><au>Capraro, Valerio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In the real world, people prefer their last whisky when tasting options in a long sequence</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-08-20</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0202732</spage><epage>e0202732</epage><pages>e0202732-e0202732</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>When people in laboratory studies sample products in a sequence, they tend to prefer options presented first and last. To what extent do these primacy and recency effects carry over to real-world settings where numerous sources of information determine preferences? To investigate this question, we coded archival data from 136 actual whisky tastings each featuring seven whiskies. We analyzed people's ratings of whiskies featured at different serial positions in the tastings. We found a recency effect: people gave their highest rating to whiskies in the last position, and voted the last whisky as their favorite more frequently. This recency effect persisted when we controlled for the counter explanation that whiskies with higher alcohol content tended to occupy later serial positions. The recency effect also persisted when we controlled for the age of the whiskies. Taken together, our findings suggest that the order of presentation matters in real-world settings, closely resembling what happens in laboratory settings with longer sequences of options.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30125313</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0202732</doi><tpages>e0202732</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-8472</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018-08, Vol.13 (8), p.e0202732-e0202732 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2090277217 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Adult Alcoholic Beverages - analysis Alcohols Behavior Biology and Life Sciences Decision making Field study Humans Influence Laboratories Medicine and Health Sciences Memory Physical Sciences Preferences Psychology Research and Analysis Methods Serial Learning Social Sciences Taste - physiology Whiskey Whisky Young Adult |
title | In the real world, people prefer their last whisky when tasting options in a long sequence |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A15%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20the%20real%20world,%20people%20prefer%20their%20last%20whisky%20when%20tasting%20options%20in%20a%20long%20sequence&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Quigley-McBride,%20Adele&rft.date=2018-08-20&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0202732&rft.epage=e0202732&rft.pages=e0202732-e0202732&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0202732&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA550931794%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1b1ec5688dd18814c0d8958c445282e7d528fc125186b76afcd8379d00eb37f73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2090277217&rft_id=info:pmid/30125313&rft_galeid=A550931794&rfr_iscdi=true |