Loading…
Detection and characterization of Lactobacillus spp. in the porcine seminal plasma and their influence on boar semen quality
The presence of pathogenic bacteria in ejaculates has been a topic in boar semen preservation over the last decades. Since little information is available on commensal bacteria in boar semen, the aim of the present study was to identify commensal lactobacilli in fresh cryopreserved boar semen and to...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2018-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e0202699-e0202699 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7a65dc64eb83729555c30a6a8af30af541870964e3002b4eacac956d0143f6063 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7a65dc64eb83729555c30a6a8af30af541870964e3002b4eacac956d0143f6063 |
container_end_page | e0202699 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e0202699 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Schulze, Martin Schäfer, Jana Simmet, Christian Jung, Markus Gabler, Christoph |
description | The presence of pathogenic bacteria in ejaculates has been a topic in boar semen preservation over the last decades. Since little information is available on commensal bacteria in boar semen, the aim of the present study was to identify commensal lactobacilli in fresh cryopreserved boar semen and to examine their influence on boar semen quality. Therefore, 111 boar ejaculates were investigated for the presence of Lactobacillus species. Thirty samples (27%) contained viable Lactobacillus species (e.g. L. amylovorus, L. animalis, L. reuteri and Weisella minor). L. animalis and L. buchneri DSM 32407 (isolated from the bovine uterus) qualified for further examinations based on their growth rate in six antibiotic-free boar semen extenders. After a 120 min short-term incubation with an antibiotic-free BTS-extender, progressive motility was diminished (P = 0.001) upon addition of 105 and 106 colony forming units (CFU/mL) L. animalis. The supplementation with L. buchneri DSM 32407 had no significant (P > 0.05) influence on sperm quality during short-term co-incubation. After 168 h long-term co-incubation, motility analysis revealed a negative (P = 0.026) impact of 105 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407. A concentration- and storage-dependent effect is particularly obvious (P < 0.001) using 106 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407. Most notably, the thermo-resistance (TRT) for 106 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407 (P = 0.001) was inferior to BTS with and without gentamicin after 72 and 168 h of semen co-incubation. The supplementation of 105 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407 impaired progressive motility to a lesser extent. The percentage of mitochondrially active spermatozoa after 96 h (P = 0.009) and membrane-intact spermatozoa after 168 h (P < 0.001) was lower when 106 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407 were suspended compared with all other groups. Finally, the addition of L. buchneri DSM 32407 to BTS-extended boar semen had no competitive effect on the total amount of bacteria 48 h after co-incubation. In summary, the present study demonstrated that there are Lactobacillus species present in the porcine seminal plasma, which can be cultivated using standard procedures. However, long-term co-incubation of lactic acid bacteria with spermatozoa had a negative influence on spermatozoa. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0202699 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2100863142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A557791788</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ba577ab5ae2549ae826c629955b9df66</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A557791788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7a65dc64eb83729555c30a6a8af30af541870964e3002b4eacac956d0143f6063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1tr2zAUx83YWLtu32BshsHYHpLpYsnWS6F0t0CgsNurOJblREGxXEke69iHn5y4JRl9GH6QOed3_ucinSx7jtEc0xK_27jBd2Dnvev0HBFEuBAPslMsKJlxgujDg_-T7EkIG4QYrTh_nJ1QhAUpS3Ga_Xmvo1bRuC6HrsnVGjyoqL35DTuja_NlMrgalLF2CHno-3luujyudd47r0yn86C3JpWS9xbCFnZCyW184lo76E7pPEnVDvyI6i6_HsCaePM0e9SCDfrZdJ5l3z9--Hb5eba8-rS4vFjOFBckzkrgrFG80HVFSyIYY4oi4FBBm86WFbgqkUh-ihCpCw0KlGC8QbigLUecnmUv97q9dUFOgwuSYIQqTnFBErHYE42Djey92YK_kQ6M3BmcX0nw0SirZQ2sLKFmoAkrBOiKcMWJSGXVomn5mO18yjbUW90o3UUP9kj02NOZtVy5n5JjUrGCJYE3k4B314MOUW5NUNpa6LQbdnVjwnlKnNBX_6D3dzdRK0gNpEtxKa8aReUFS90IXFZVoub3UOlr0vWq9Mpak-xHAW-PAhIT9a-4giEEufj65f_Zqx_H7OsDdq3BxnVwdhgfZDgGiz2ovAvB6_ZuyBjJcUlupyHHJZHTkqSwF4cXdBd0uxX0L4sbDTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2100863142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection and characterization of Lactobacillus spp. in the porcine seminal plasma and their influence on boar semen quality</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Schulze, Martin ; Schäfer, Jana ; Simmet, Christian ; Jung, Markus ; Gabler, Christoph</creator><contributor>Drevet, Joël R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schulze, Martin ; Schäfer, Jana ; Simmet, Christian ; Jung, Markus ; Gabler, Christoph ; Drevet, Joël R.</creatorcontrib><description>The presence of pathogenic bacteria in ejaculates has been a topic in boar semen preservation over the last decades. Since little information is available on commensal bacteria in boar semen, the aim of the present study was to identify commensal lactobacilli in fresh cryopreserved boar semen and to examine their influence on boar semen quality. Therefore, 111 boar ejaculates were investigated for the presence of Lactobacillus species. Thirty samples (27%) contained viable Lactobacillus species (e.g. L. amylovorus, L. animalis, L. reuteri and Weisella minor). L. animalis and L. buchneri DSM 32407 (isolated from the bovine uterus) qualified for further examinations based on their growth rate in six antibiotic-free boar semen extenders. After a 120 min short-term incubation with an antibiotic-free BTS-extender, progressive motility was diminished (P = 0.001) upon addition of 105 and 106 colony forming units (CFU/mL) L. animalis. The supplementation with L. buchneri DSM 32407 had no significant (P > 0.05) influence on sperm quality during short-term co-incubation. After 168 h long-term co-incubation, motility analysis revealed a negative (P = 0.026) impact of 105 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407. A concentration- and storage-dependent effect is particularly obvious (P < 0.001) using 106 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407. Most notably, the thermo-resistance (TRT) for 106 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407 (P = 0.001) was inferior to BTS with and without gentamicin after 72 and 168 h of semen co-incubation. The supplementation of 105 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407 impaired progressive motility to a lesser extent. The percentage of mitochondrially active spermatozoa after 96 h (P = 0.009) and membrane-intact spermatozoa after 168 h (P < 0.001) was lower when 106 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407 were suspended compared with all other groups. Finally, the addition of L. buchneri DSM 32407 to BTS-extended boar semen had no competitive effect on the total amount of bacteria 48 h after co-incubation. In summary, the present study demonstrated that there are Lactobacillus species present in the porcine seminal plasma, which can be cultivated using standard procedures. However, long-term co-incubation of lactic acid bacteria with spermatozoa had a negative influence on spermatozoa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202699</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30192779</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animals ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; Bacteria ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Boars (Male swine) ; Cryopreservation ; Drug dosages ; Gentamicin ; Growth rate ; Hogs ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Influence ; Laboratories ; Lactic acid ; Lactic acid bacteria ; Lactobacilli ; Lactobacillus ; Lactobacillus - physiology ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mitochondria ; Motility ; Physiological aspects ; Plasma ; Probiotics ; Quality ; Reproductive technologies ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Ribosomal DNA ; Semen ; Semen - microbiology ; Semen Preservation ; Species ; Sperm ; Spermatozoa ; Time Factors ; Uterus ; Veterinary medicine</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e0202699-e0202699</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2018 Schulze et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Schulze et al 2018 Schulze et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7a65dc64eb83729555c30a6a8af30af541870964e3002b4eacac956d0143f6063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7a65dc64eb83729555c30a6a8af30af541870964e3002b4eacac956d0143f6063</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7932-9412</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2100863142/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2100863142?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30192779$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Drevet, Joël R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schulze, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmet, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabler, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>Detection and characterization of Lactobacillus spp. in the porcine seminal plasma and their influence on boar semen quality</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The presence of pathogenic bacteria in ejaculates has been a topic in boar semen preservation over the last decades. Since little information is available on commensal bacteria in boar semen, the aim of the present study was to identify commensal lactobacilli in fresh cryopreserved boar semen and to examine their influence on boar semen quality. Therefore, 111 boar ejaculates were investigated for the presence of Lactobacillus species. Thirty samples (27%) contained viable Lactobacillus species (e.g. L. amylovorus, L. animalis, L. reuteri and Weisella minor). L. animalis and L. buchneri DSM 32407 (isolated from the bovine uterus) qualified for further examinations based on their growth rate in six antibiotic-free boar semen extenders. After a 120 min short-term incubation with an antibiotic-free BTS-extender, progressive motility was diminished (P = 0.001) upon addition of 105 and 106 colony forming units (CFU/mL) L. animalis. The supplementation with L. buchneri DSM 32407 had no significant (P > 0.05) influence on sperm quality during short-term co-incubation. After 168 h long-term co-incubation, motility analysis revealed a negative (P = 0.026) impact of 105 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407. A concentration- and storage-dependent effect is particularly obvious (P < 0.001) using 106 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407. Most notably, the thermo-resistance (TRT) for 106 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407 (P = 0.001) was inferior to BTS with and without gentamicin after 72 and 168 h of semen co-incubation. The supplementation of 105 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407 impaired progressive motility to a lesser extent. The percentage of mitochondrially active spermatozoa after 96 h (P = 0.009) and membrane-intact spermatozoa after 168 h (P < 0.001) was lower when 106 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407 were suspended compared with all other groups. Finally, the addition of L. buchneri DSM 32407 to BTS-extended boar semen had no competitive effect on the total amount of bacteria 48 h after co-incubation. In summary, the present study demonstrated that there are Lactobacillus species present in the porcine seminal plasma, which can be cultivated using standard procedures. However, long-term co-incubation of lactic acid bacteria with spermatozoa had a negative influence on spermatozoa.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Boars (Male swine)</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Gentamicin</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lactic acid</subject><subject>Lactic acid bacteria</subject><subject>Lactobacilli</subject><subject>Lactobacillus</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mitochondria</subject><subject>Motility</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Ribosomal DNA</subject><subject>Semen</subject><subject>Semen - microbiology</subject><subject>Semen Preservation</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sperm</subject><subject>Spermatozoa</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1tr2zAUx83YWLtu32BshsHYHpLpYsnWS6F0t0CgsNurOJblREGxXEke69iHn5y4JRl9GH6QOed3_ucinSx7jtEc0xK_27jBd2Dnvev0HBFEuBAPslMsKJlxgujDg_-T7EkIG4QYrTh_nJ1QhAUpS3Ga_Xmvo1bRuC6HrsnVGjyoqL35DTuja_NlMrgalLF2CHno-3luujyudd47r0yn86C3JpWS9xbCFnZCyW184lo76E7pPEnVDvyI6i6_HsCaePM0e9SCDfrZdJ5l3z9--Hb5eba8-rS4vFjOFBckzkrgrFG80HVFSyIYY4oi4FBBm86WFbgqkUh-ihCpCw0KlGC8QbigLUecnmUv97q9dUFOgwuSYIQqTnFBErHYE42Djey92YK_kQ6M3BmcX0nw0SirZQ2sLKFmoAkrBOiKcMWJSGXVomn5mO18yjbUW90o3UUP9kj02NOZtVy5n5JjUrGCJYE3k4B314MOUW5NUNpa6LQbdnVjwnlKnNBX_6D3dzdRK0gNpEtxKa8aReUFS90IXFZVoub3UOlr0vWq9Mpak-xHAW-PAhIT9a-4giEEufj65f_Zqx_H7OsDdq3BxnVwdhgfZDgGiz2ovAvB6_ZuyBjJcUlupyHHJZHTkqSwF4cXdBd0uxX0L4sbDTQ</recordid><startdate>20180907</startdate><enddate>20180907</enddate><creator>Schulze, Martin</creator><creator>Schäfer, Jana</creator><creator>Simmet, Christian</creator><creator>Jung, Markus</creator><creator>Gabler, Christoph</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7932-9412</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180907</creationdate><title>Detection and characterization of Lactobacillus spp. in the porcine seminal plasma and their influence on boar semen quality</title><author>Schulze, Martin ; Schäfer, Jana ; Simmet, Christian ; Jung, Markus ; Gabler, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7a65dc64eb83729555c30a6a8af30af541870964e3002b4eacac956d0143f6063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Boars (Male swine)</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Gentamicin</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lactic acid</topic><topic>Lactic acid bacteria</topic><topic>Lactobacilli</topic><topic>Lactobacillus</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mitochondria</topic><topic>Motility</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Ribosomal DNA</topic><topic>Semen</topic><topic>Semen - microbiology</topic><topic>Semen Preservation</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sperm</topic><topic>Spermatozoa</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schulze, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmet, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabler, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schulze, Martin</au><au>Schäfer, Jana</au><au>Simmet, Christian</au><au>Jung, Markus</au><au>Gabler, Christoph</au><au>Drevet, Joël R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection and characterization of Lactobacillus spp. in the porcine seminal plasma and their influence on boar semen quality</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-09-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0202699</spage><epage>e0202699</epage><pages>e0202699-e0202699</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The presence of pathogenic bacteria in ejaculates has been a topic in boar semen preservation over the last decades. Since little information is available on commensal bacteria in boar semen, the aim of the present study was to identify commensal lactobacilli in fresh cryopreserved boar semen and to examine their influence on boar semen quality. Therefore, 111 boar ejaculates were investigated for the presence of Lactobacillus species. Thirty samples (27%) contained viable Lactobacillus species (e.g. L. amylovorus, L. animalis, L. reuteri and Weisella minor). L. animalis and L. buchneri DSM 32407 (isolated from the bovine uterus) qualified for further examinations based on their growth rate in six antibiotic-free boar semen extenders. After a 120 min short-term incubation with an antibiotic-free BTS-extender, progressive motility was diminished (P = 0.001) upon addition of 105 and 106 colony forming units (CFU/mL) L. animalis. The supplementation with L. buchneri DSM 32407 had no significant (P > 0.05) influence on sperm quality during short-term co-incubation. After 168 h long-term co-incubation, motility analysis revealed a negative (P = 0.026) impact of 105 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407. A concentration- and storage-dependent effect is particularly obvious (P < 0.001) using 106 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407. Most notably, the thermo-resistance (TRT) for 106 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407 (P = 0.001) was inferior to BTS with and without gentamicin after 72 and 168 h of semen co-incubation. The supplementation of 105 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407 impaired progressive motility to a lesser extent. The percentage of mitochondrially active spermatozoa after 96 h (P = 0.009) and membrane-intact spermatozoa after 168 h (P < 0.001) was lower when 106 CFU/mL L. buchneri DSM 32407 were suspended compared with all other groups. Finally, the addition of L. buchneri DSM 32407 to BTS-extended boar semen had no competitive effect on the total amount of bacteria 48 h after co-incubation. In summary, the present study demonstrated that there are Lactobacillus species present in the porcine seminal plasma, which can be cultivated using standard procedures. However, long-term co-incubation of lactic acid bacteria with spermatozoa had a negative influence on spermatozoa.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30192779</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0202699</doi><tpages>e0202699</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7932-9412</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e0202699-e0202699 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2100863142 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central |
subjects | Analysis Animals Antibiotics Antimicrobial agents Bacteria Biology and Life Sciences Boars (Male swine) Cryopreservation Drug dosages Gentamicin Growth rate Hogs Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Influence Laboratories Lactic acid Lactic acid bacteria Lactobacilli Lactobacillus Lactobacillus - physiology Male Medicine and Health Sciences Mitochondria Motility Physiological aspects Plasma Probiotics Quality Reproductive technologies Research and Analysis Methods Ribosomal DNA Semen Semen - microbiology Semen Preservation Species Sperm Spermatozoa Time Factors Uterus Veterinary medicine |
title | Detection and characterization of Lactobacillus spp. in the porcine seminal plasma and their influence on boar semen quality |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A43%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20and%20characterization%20of%20Lactobacillus%20spp.%20in%20the%20porcine%20seminal%20plasma%20and%20their%20influence%20on%20boar%20semen%20quality&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Schulze,%20Martin&rft.date=2018-09-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0202699&rft.epage=e0202699&rft.pages=e0202699-e0202699&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0202699&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA557791788%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7a65dc64eb83729555c30a6a8af30af541870964e3002b4eacac956d0143f6063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2100863142&rft_id=info:pmid/30192779&rft_galeid=A557791788&rfr_iscdi=true |