Loading…

Test-retest reliability of task-based and resting-state blood oxygen level dependence and cerebral blood flow measures

Despite their wide-spread use, only limited information is available on the comparative test-retest reliability of task-based functional and resting state magnetic resonance imaging measures of blood oxygen level dependence (tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) using arterial spin labe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2018-11, Vol.13 (11), p.e0206583-e0206583
Main Authors: Holiga, Štefan, Sambataro, Fabio, Luzy, Cécile, Greig, Gérard, Sarkar, Neena, Renken, Remco J, Marsman, Jan-Bernard C, Schobel, Scott A, Bertolino, Alessandro, Dukart, Juergen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c4e736611df0bda9fd2d3ae90d4fb9dd79f7d1b55fc916ee50d58370d34c72ca3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c4e736611df0bda9fd2d3ae90d4fb9dd79f7d1b55fc916ee50d58370d34c72ca3
container_end_page e0206583
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0206583
container_title PloS one
container_volume 13
creator Holiga, Štefan
Sambataro, Fabio
Luzy, Cécile
Greig, Gérard
Sarkar, Neena
Renken, Remco J
Marsman, Jan-Bernard C
Schobel, Scott A
Bertolino, Alessandro
Dukart, Juergen
description Despite their wide-spread use, only limited information is available on the comparative test-retest reliability of task-based functional and resting state magnetic resonance imaging measures of blood oxygen level dependence (tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) using arterial spin labeling. This information is critical to designing properly powered longitudinal studies. Here we comprehensively quantified and compared the test-retest reliability and reproducibility performance of 8 commonly applied fMRI tasks, 6 rs-fMRI metrics and CBF in 30 healthy volunteers. We find large variability in test-retest reliability performance across the different tb-fMRI paradigms and rs-fMRI metrics, ranging from poor to excellent. A larger extent of activation in tb-fMRI is linked to higher between-subject reliability of the respective task suggesting that differences in the amount of activation may be used as a first reliability estimate of novel tb-fMRI paradigms. For rs-fMRI, a good reliability of local activity estimates is paralleled by poor performance of global connectivity metrics. Evaluated CBF measures provide in general a good to excellent test-reliability matching or surpassing the best performing tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI metrics. This comprehensive effort allows for direct comparisons of test-retest reliability between the evaluated MRI domains and measures to aid the design of future tb-fMRI, rs-fMRI and CBF studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0206583
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2131221132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b22cf8dfe6f5453e8786f3f1e472b9a3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2131221132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c4e736611df0bda9fd2d3ae90d4fb9dd79f7d1b55fc916ee50d58370d34c72ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkstu1DAUhqMK1JbSN0AQiQ2bDL7ETrJBqioulSqxKWvLl-NpBo892M7AvD2embRqEatj-XznPxf9VfUGowWmHf64ClP00i02wcMCEcRZT0-qczxQ0nCC6Isn77PqVUorhBjtOT-tzihqUY86cl5t7yDlJkIuoY7gRqlGN-ZdHWydZfrZKJnA1NKbkk159MsmZZmhVi4EU4c_uyX42sEWXG1gA96A13DgNURQUboZtS78rtcg01SEXlcvrXQJLud4Uf348vnu-ltz-_3rzfXVbaMZ4bnRLXSUc4yNRcrIwRpiqIQBmdaqwZhusJ3BijGrB8wBGDLlCh0ytNUd0ZJeVO-OuhsXkphPlgTBFBOCMSWFuDkSJsiV2MRxLeNOBDmKw0eISyFjHrUDoQjRtjcWuGUto9B3PbfUYmg7ogZJi9anuduk1mA0-Fz2fyb6POPHe7EMW8EJaRHfD_NhFojh11TuLdZj0uCc9BCmw9yEMDagoaDv_0H_v117pHQMKUWwj8NgJPY2eqgSexuJ2Ual7O3TRR6LHnxD_wJ61Mjc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2131221132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Test-retest reliability of task-based and resting-state blood oxygen level dependence and cerebral blood flow measures</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Holiga, Štefan ; Sambataro, Fabio ; Luzy, Cécile ; Greig, Gérard ; Sarkar, Neena ; Renken, Remco J ; Marsman, Jan-Bernard C ; Schobel, Scott A ; Bertolino, Alessandro ; Dukart, Juergen</creator><contributor>Hayasaka, Satoru</contributor><creatorcontrib>Holiga, Štefan ; Sambataro, Fabio ; Luzy, Cécile ; Greig, Gérard ; Sarkar, Neena ; Renken, Remco J ; Marsman, Jan-Bernard C ; Schobel, Scott A ; Bertolino, Alessandro ; Dukart, Juergen ; Hayasaka, Satoru</creatorcontrib><description>Despite their wide-spread use, only limited information is available on the comparative test-retest reliability of task-based functional and resting state magnetic resonance imaging measures of blood oxygen level dependence (tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) using arterial spin labeling. This information is critical to designing properly powered longitudinal studies. Here we comprehensively quantified and compared the test-retest reliability and reproducibility performance of 8 commonly applied fMRI tasks, 6 rs-fMRI metrics and CBF in 30 healthy volunteers. We find large variability in test-retest reliability performance across the different tb-fMRI paradigms and rs-fMRI metrics, ranging from poor to excellent. A larger extent of activation in tb-fMRI is linked to higher between-subject reliability of the respective task suggesting that differences in the amount of activation may be used as a first reliability estimate of novel tb-fMRI paradigms. For rs-fMRI, a good reliability of local activity estimates is paralleled by poor performance of global connectivity metrics. Evaluated CBF measures provide in general a good to excellent test-reliability matching or surpassing the best performing tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI metrics. This comprehensive effort allows for direct comparisons of test-retest reliability between the evaluated MRI domains and measures to aid the design of future tb-fMRI, rs-fMRI and CBF studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206583</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30408072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Activation ; Adult ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Blood ; Blood flow ; Brain - anatomy &amp; histology ; Brain - blood supply ; Brain - physiology ; Cerebral blood flow ; Cerebrovascular Circulation ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Connectivity ; Correlation analysis ; Dependence ; Disease ; Domains ; Female ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Functional Neuroimaging - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Information dissemination ; Longitudinal studies ; Magnetic resonance ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Models, Neurological ; Neurosciences ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Oxygen ; Oxygen - blood ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Rest - physiology ; Social Sciences ; Spin labeling ; Spin Labels ; Studies ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018-11, Vol.13 (11), p.e0206583-e0206583</ispartof><rights>2018 Holiga et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 Holiga et al 2018 Holiga et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c4e736611df0bda9fd2d3ae90d4fb9dd79f7d1b55fc916ee50d58370d34c72ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c4e736611df0bda9fd2d3ae90d4fb9dd79f7d1b55fc916ee50d58370d34c72ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0492-5644</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2131221132/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2131221132?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30408072$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hayasaka, Satoru</contributor><creatorcontrib>Holiga, Štefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sambataro, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luzy, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greig, Gérard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Neena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renken, Remco J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsman, Jan-Bernard C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schobel, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertolino, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dukart, Juergen</creatorcontrib><title>Test-retest reliability of task-based and resting-state blood oxygen level dependence and cerebral blood flow measures</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Despite their wide-spread use, only limited information is available on the comparative test-retest reliability of task-based functional and resting state magnetic resonance imaging measures of blood oxygen level dependence (tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) using arterial spin labeling. This information is critical to designing properly powered longitudinal studies. Here we comprehensively quantified and compared the test-retest reliability and reproducibility performance of 8 commonly applied fMRI tasks, 6 rs-fMRI metrics and CBF in 30 healthy volunteers. We find large variability in test-retest reliability performance across the different tb-fMRI paradigms and rs-fMRI metrics, ranging from poor to excellent. A larger extent of activation in tb-fMRI is linked to higher between-subject reliability of the respective task suggesting that differences in the amount of activation may be used as a first reliability estimate of novel tb-fMRI paradigms. For rs-fMRI, a good reliability of local activity estimates is paralleled by poor performance of global connectivity metrics. Evaluated CBF measures provide in general a good to excellent test-reliability matching or surpassing the best performing tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI metrics. This comprehensive effort allows for direct comparisons of test-retest reliability between the evaluated MRI domains and measures to aid the design of future tb-fMRI, rs-fMRI and CBF studies.</description><subject>Activation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood flow</subject><subject>Brain - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Brain - blood supply</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Cerebral blood flow</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Circulation</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Connectivity</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Functional Neuroimaging - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen - blood</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Rest - physiology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Spin labeling</subject><subject>Spin Labels</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkstu1DAUhqMK1JbSN0AQiQ2bDL7ETrJBqioulSqxKWvLl-NpBo892M7AvD2embRqEatj-XznPxf9VfUGowWmHf64ClP00i02wcMCEcRZT0-qczxQ0nCC6Isn77PqVUorhBjtOT-tzihqUY86cl5t7yDlJkIuoY7gRqlGN-ZdHWydZfrZKJnA1NKbkk159MsmZZmhVi4EU4c_uyX42sEWXG1gA96A13DgNURQUboZtS78rtcg01SEXlcvrXQJLud4Uf348vnu-ltz-_3rzfXVbaMZ4bnRLXSUc4yNRcrIwRpiqIQBmdaqwZhusJ3BijGrB8wBGDLlCh0ytNUd0ZJeVO-OuhsXkphPlgTBFBOCMSWFuDkSJsiV2MRxLeNOBDmKw0eISyFjHrUDoQjRtjcWuGUto9B3PbfUYmg7ogZJi9anuduk1mA0-Fz2fyb6POPHe7EMW8EJaRHfD_NhFojh11TuLdZj0uCc9BCmw9yEMDagoaDv_0H_v117pHQMKUWwj8NgJPY2eqgSexuJ2Ual7O3TRR6LHnxD_wJ61Mjc</recordid><startdate>20181108</startdate><enddate>20181108</enddate><creator>Holiga, Štefan</creator><creator>Sambataro, Fabio</creator><creator>Luzy, Cécile</creator><creator>Greig, Gérard</creator><creator>Sarkar, Neena</creator><creator>Renken, Remco J</creator><creator>Marsman, Jan-Bernard C</creator><creator>Schobel, Scott A</creator><creator>Bertolino, Alessandro</creator><creator>Dukart, Juergen</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-5644</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181108</creationdate><title>Test-retest reliability of task-based and resting-state blood oxygen level dependence and cerebral blood flow measures</title><author>Holiga, Štefan ; Sambataro, Fabio ; Luzy, Cécile ; Greig, Gérard ; Sarkar, Neena ; Renken, Remco J ; Marsman, Jan-Bernard C ; Schobel, Scott A ; Bertolino, Alessandro ; Dukart, Juergen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c4e736611df0bda9fd2d3ae90d4fb9dd79f7d1b55fc916ee50d58370d34c72ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Activation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood flow</topic><topic>Brain - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Brain - blood supply</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Cerebral blood flow</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Circulation</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Connectivity</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Functional Neuroimaging - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen - blood</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Rest - physiology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Spin labeling</topic><topic>Spin Labels</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holiga, Štefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sambataro, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luzy, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greig, Gérard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Neena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renken, Remco J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsman, Jan-Bernard C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schobel, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertolino, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dukart, Juergen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holiga, Štefan</au><au>Sambataro, Fabio</au><au>Luzy, Cécile</au><au>Greig, Gérard</au><au>Sarkar, Neena</au><au>Renken, Remco J</au><au>Marsman, Jan-Bernard C</au><au>Schobel, Scott A</au><au>Bertolino, Alessandro</au><au>Dukart, Juergen</au><au>Hayasaka, Satoru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Test-retest reliability of task-based and resting-state blood oxygen level dependence and cerebral blood flow measures</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018-11-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0206583</spage><epage>e0206583</epage><pages>e0206583-e0206583</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Despite their wide-spread use, only limited information is available on the comparative test-retest reliability of task-based functional and resting state magnetic resonance imaging measures of blood oxygen level dependence (tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) using arterial spin labeling. This information is critical to designing properly powered longitudinal studies. Here we comprehensively quantified and compared the test-retest reliability and reproducibility performance of 8 commonly applied fMRI tasks, 6 rs-fMRI metrics and CBF in 30 healthy volunteers. We find large variability in test-retest reliability performance across the different tb-fMRI paradigms and rs-fMRI metrics, ranging from poor to excellent. A larger extent of activation in tb-fMRI is linked to higher between-subject reliability of the respective task suggesting that differences in the amount of activation may be used as a first reliability estimate of novel tb-fMRI paradigms. For rs-fMRI, a good reliability of local activity estimates is paralleled by poor performance of global connectivity metrics. Evaluated CBF measures provide in general a good to excellent test-reliability matching or surpassing the best performing tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI metrics. This comprehensive effort allows for direct comparisons of test-retest reliability between the evaluated MRI domains and measures to aid the design of future tb-fMRI, rs-fMRI and CBF studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30408072</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0206583</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-5644</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2018-11, Vol.13 (11), p.e0206583-e0206583
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2131221132
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Activation
Adult
Biology and Life Sciences
Blood
Blood flow
Brain - anatomy & histology
Brain - blood supply
Brain - physiology
Cerebral blood flow
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Computer and Information Sciences
Connectivity
Correlation analysis
Dependence
Disease
Domains
Female
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Functional Neuroimaging - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Information dissemination
Longitudinal studies
Magnetic resonance
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics & numerical data
Male
Medical imaging
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Models, Neurological
Neurosciences
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Oxygen
Oxygen - blood
Reliability analysis
Reproducibility
Reproducibility of Results
Research and Analysis Methods
Rest - physiology
Social Sciences
Spin labeling
Spin Labels
Studies
Task Performance and Analysis
Young Adult
title Test-retest reliability of task-based and resting-state blood oxygen level dependence and cerebral blood flow measures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A51%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Test-retest%20reliability%20of%20task-based%20and%20resting-state%20blood%20oxygen%20level%20dependence%20and%20cerebral%20blood%20flow%20measures&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Holiga,%20%C5%A0tefan&rft.date=2018-11-08&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0206583&rft.epage=e0206583&rft.pages=e0206583-e0206583&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0206583&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2131221132%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c4e736611df0bda9fd2d3ae90d4fb9dd79f7d1b55fc916ee50d58370d34c72ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2131221132&rft_id=info:pmid/30408072&rfr_iscdi=true