Loading…
Computerization and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK
To describe the opinions of British general practitioners regarding the potential of future technology to replace key tasks carried out in primary care. Cross sectional online survey. 1,474 registered GPs in the United Kingdom. Investigators measured GPs' opinions about the likelihood that futu...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2018, Vol.13 (12), p.e0207418-e0207418 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-80ffec14b7a532a953641f3ed27d9a87ea16a7e14ffee841b5458fdb676f8953 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-80ffec14b7a532a953641f3ed27d9a87ea16a7e14ffee841b5458fdb676f8953 |
container_end_page | e0207418 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0207418 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Blease, Charlotte Bernstein, Michael H Gaab, Jens Kaptchuk, Ted J Kossowsky, Joe Mandl, Kenneth D Davis, Roger B DesRoches, Catherine M |
description | To describe the opinions of British general practitioners regarding the potential of future technology to replace key tasks carried out in primary care.
Cross sectional online survey.
1,474 registered GPs in the United Kingdom.
Investigators measured GPs' opinions about the likelihood that future technology will be able to fully replace-not merely aid-the average GP in performing six primary care tasks; in addition, if GPs considered replacement for a particular task likely, the survey measured opinions about how many years from now this technological capacity might emerge.
A total of 720 (49%) responded to the survey. Most GPs believed it unlikely that technology will ever be able to fully replace physicians when it comes to diagnosing patients (489, 68%), referring patients to other specialists (444, 61%), formulating personalized treatment plans (441, 61%), and delivering empathic care (680, 94%). GPs were not in agreement about prognostics: one in two participants (380, 53%) considered it likely that technology will be fully capable of replacing physicians in performing this task, nearly half (187, 49%) of whom believed that the technological capacity will arise in the next ten years. Against these findings, the majority of GPs (578, 80%) believed it likely that future technology will be able to fully replace humans to undertake documentation; among them 261 (79%) estimated that the technological wherewithal would emerge during the next ten years. In general, age and gender were not correlated with opinions; nor was reported burnout and job satisfaction or whether GPs worked full time or part time.
The majority of UK GPs in this survey were skeptical about the potential for future technology to perform most primary care tasks as well as or better than humans. However, respondents were optimistic that in the near future technology would have the capacity to fully replace GPs' in undertaking administrative duties related to patient documentation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0207418 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2155128870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_28b16ac652b54858acd796f49f22ddc6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2155128870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-80ffec14b7a532a953641f3ed27d9a87ea16a7e14ffee841b5458fdb676f8953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxBEYsOCGWzHr7BAGg2vikpsChsWluNcTz3KxIMdF5VfjzNJqw5iZcv-zrkPnaJ4jtESVwK_3foUet0t976HJSJIUCwfFKe4rsiCE1Q9vHc_KZ7EuEWIVZLzx8VJhRhFosanxc-13-3TAMH90YPzfan7thyuoLRpSAFKb8t9cDsdbkqjA7wrV2VM4Rpuxp8N9BB0lwltBjfKIcTS9QeD71-fFo-s7iI8m8-z4vLTx8v1l8XFt8_n69XFwjBeDQuJrAWDaSM0q4iuWcUpthW0RLS1lgI05loAphkDSXHDKJO2bbjgVmb6rHg52e47H9W8lqgIZgwTKQXKxPlEtF5v1TyP8tqpw4MPG6XD4EwHisgmVzOckVxGMqlNK2puaW0JaVvDs9ebySv-hn1qjtw-uB-rg1tKiubKdGzu_dxcanbQGuiHvLEj1fFP767Uxl8rTmqMuMgGr2eD4H8liIPauWig63QPPk1jylrQmmT01T_o_5dBJ8oEH2MAe9cMRmpM1q1KjclSc7Ky7MX9Qe5Et1Gq_gKdD80L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2155128870</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computerization and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Blease, Charlotte ; Bernstein, Michael H ; Gaab, Jens ; Kaptchuk, Ted J ; Kossowsky, Joe ; Mandl, Kenneth D ; Davis, Roger B ; DesRoches, Catherine M</creator><contributor>Kamolz, Lars-Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Blease, Charlotte ; Bernstein, Michael H ; Gaab, Jens ; Kaptchuk, Ted J ; Kossowsky, Joe ; Mandl, Kenneth D ; Davis, Roger B ; DesRoches, Catherine M ; Kamolz, Lars-Peter</creatorcontrib><description>To describe the opinions of British general practitioners regarding the potential of future technology to replace key tasks carried out in primary care.
Cross sectional online survey.
1,474 registered GPs in the United Kingdom.
Investigators measured GPs' opinions about the likelihood that future technology will be able to fully replace-not merely aid-the average GP in performing six primary care tasks; in addition, if GPs considered replacement for a particular task likely, the survey measured opinions about how many years from now this technological capacity might emerge.
A total of 720 (49%) responded to the survey. Most GPs believed it unlikely that technology will ever be able to fully replace physicians when it comes to diagnosing patients (489, 68%), referring patients to other specialists (444, 61%), formulating personalized treatment plans (441, 61%), and delivering empathic care (680, 94%). GPs were not in agreement about prognostics: one in two participants (380, 53%) considered it likely that technology will be fully capable of replacing physicians in performing this task, nearly half (187, 49%) of whom believed that the technological capacity will arise in the next ten years. Against these findings, the majority of GPs (578, 80%) believed it likely that future technology will be able to fully replace humans to undertake documentation; among them 261 (79%) estimated that the technological wherewithal would emerge during the next ten years. In general, age and gender were not correlated with opinions; nor was reported burnout and job satisfaction or whether GPs worked full time or part time.
The majority of UK GPs in this survey were skeptical about the potential for future technology to perform most primary care tasks as well as or better than humans. However, respondents were optimistic that in the near future technology would have the capacity to fully replace GPs' in undertaking administrative duties related to patient documentation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207418</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30540791</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Artificial intelligence ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Big Data ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Burnout ; Clinical psychology ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Documentation ; Family physicians ; Female ; General Practitioners - psychology ; Health care ; Humans ; Informatics ; Internal medicine ; Job satisfaction ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medical Records Systems, Computerized ; Medical schools ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; People and Places ; Physicians ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care ; Professions ; Psychotherapy ; Referral and Consultation ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social Sciences ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Technology ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2018, Vol.13 (12), p.e0207418-e0207418</ispartof><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-80ffec14b7a532a953641f3ed27d9a87ea16a7e14ffee841b5458fdb676f8953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-80ffec14b7a532a953641f3ed27d9a87ea16a7e14ffee841b5458fdb676f8953</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3657-2476</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2155128870/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2155128870?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,25753,27923,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30540791$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-488745$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kamolz, Lars-Peter</contributor><creatorcontrib>Blease, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, Michael H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaab, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaptchuk, Ted J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kossowsky, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandl, Kenneth D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Roger B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DesRoches, Catherine M</creatorcontrib><title>Computerization and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To describe the opinions of British general practitioners regarding the potential of future technology to replace key tasks carried out in primary care.
Cross sectional online survey.
1,474 registered GPs in the United Kingdom.
Investigators measured GPs' opinions about the likelihood that future technology will be able to fully replace-not merely aid-the average GP in performing six primary care tasks; in addition, if GPs considered replacement for a particular task likely, the survey measured opinions about how many years from now this technological capacity might emerge.
A total of 720 (49%) responded to the survey. Most GPs believed it unlikely that technology will ever be able to fully replace physicians when it comes to diagnosing patients (489, 68%), referring patients to other specialists (444, 61%), formulating personalized treatment plans (441, 61%), and delivering empathic care (680, 94%). GPs were not in agreement about prognostics: one in two participants (380, 53%) considered it likely that technology will be fully capable of replacing physicians in performing this task, nearly half (187, 49%) of whom believed that the technological capacity will arise in the next ten years. Against these findings, the majority of GPs (578, 80%) believed it likely that future technology will be able to fully replace humans to undertake documentation; among them 261 (79%) estimated that the technological wherewithal would emerge during the next ten years. In general, age and gender were not correlated with opinions; nor was reported burnout and job satisfaction or whether GPs worked full time or part time.
The majority of UK GPs in this survey were skeptical about the potential for future technology to perform most primary care tasks as well as or better than humans. However, respondents were optimistic that in the near future technology would have the capacity to fully replace GPs' in undertaking administrative duties related to patient documentation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Big Data</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Burnout</subject><subject>Clinical psychology</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General Practitioners - psychology</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informatics</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Professions</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxBEYsOCGWzHr7BAGg2vikpsChsWluNcTz3KxIMdF5VfjzNJqw5iZcv-zrkPnaJ4jtESVwK_3foUet0t976HJSJIUCwfFKe4rsiCE1Q9vHc_KZ7EuEWIVZLzx8VJhRhFosanxc-13-3TAMH90YPzfan7thyuoLRpSAFKb8t9cDsdbkqjA7wrV2VM4Rpuxp8N9BB0lwltBjfKIcTS9QeD71-fFo-s7iI8m8-z4vLTx8v1l8XFt8_n69XFwjBeDQuJrAWDaSM0q4iuWcUpthW0RLS1lgI05loAphkDSXHDKJO2bbjgVmb6rHg52e47H9W8lqgIZgwTKQXKxPlEtF5v1TyP8tqpw4MPG6XD4EwHisgmVzOckVxGMqlNK2puaW0JaVvDs9ebySv-hn1qjtw-uB-rg1tKiubKdGzu_dxcanbQGuiHvLEj1fFP767Uxl8rTmqMuMgGr2eD4H8liIPauWig63QPPk1jylrQmmT01T_o_5dBJ8oEH2MAe9cMRmpM1q1KjclSc7Ky7MX9Qe5Et1Gq_gKdD80L</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Blease, Charlotte</creator><creator>Bernstein, Michael H</creator><creator>Gaab, Jens</creator><creator>Kaptchuk, Ted J</creator><creator>Kossowsky, Joe</creator><creator>Mandl, Kenneth D</creator><creator>Davis, Roger B</creator><creator>DesRoches, Catherine M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACNBI</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>DF2</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3657-2476</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Computerization and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK</title><author>Blease, Charlotte ; Bernstein, Michael H ; Gaab, Jens ; Kaptchuk, Ted J ; Kossowsky, Joe ; Mandl, Kenneth D ; Davis, Roger B ; DesRoches, Catherine M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-80ffec14b7a532a953641f3ed27d9a87ea16a7e14ffee841b5458fdb676f8953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Big Data</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Burnout</topic><topic>Clinical psychology</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General Practitioners - psychology</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informatics</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Professions</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blease, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, Michael H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaab, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaptchuk, Ted J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kossowsky, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandl, Kenneth D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Roger B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DesRoches, Catherine M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blease, Charlotte</au><au>Bernstein, Michael H</au><au>Gaab, Jens</au><au>Kaptchuk, Ted J</au><au>Kossowsky, Joe</au><au>Mandl, Kenneth D</au><au>Davis, Roger B</au><au>DesRoches, Catherine M</au><au>Kamolz, Lars-Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computerization and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0207418</spage><epage>e0207418</epage><pages>e0207418-e0207418</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To describe the opinions of British general practitioners regarding the potential of future technology to replace key tasks carried out in primary care.
Cross sectional online survey.
1,474 registered GPs in the United Kingdom.
Investigators measured GPs' opinions about the likelihood that future technology will be able to fully replace-not merely aid-the average GP in performing six primary care tasks; in addition, if GPs considered replacement for a particular task likely, the survey measured opinions about how many years from now this technological capacity might emerge.
A total of 720 (49%) responded to the survey. Most GPs believed it unlikely that technology will ever be able to fully replace physicians when it comes to diagnosing patients (489, 68%), referring patients to other specialists (444, 61%), formulating personalized treatment plans (441, 61%), and delivering empathic care (680, 94%). GPs were not in agreement about prognostics: one in two participants (380, 53%) considered it likely that technology will be fully capable of replacing physicians in performing this task, nearly half (187, 49%) of whom believed that the technological capacity will arise in the next ten years. Against these findings, the majority of GPs (578, 80%) believed it likely that future technology will be able to fully replace humans to undertake documentation; among them 261 (79%) estimated that the technological wherewithal would emerge during the next ten years. In general, age and gender were not correlated with opinions; nor was reported burnout and job satisfaction or whether GPs worked full time or part time.
The majority of UK GPs in this survey were skeptical about the potential for future technology to perform most primary care tasks as well as or better than humans. However, respondents were optimistic that in the near future technology would have the capacity to fully replace GPs' in undertaking administrative duties related to patient documentation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30540791</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0207418</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3657-2476</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2018, Vol.13 (12), p.e0207418-e0207418 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2155128870 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Adult Aged Artificial intelligence Attitude of Health Personnel Big Data Biology and Life Sciences Burnout Clinical psychology Computer and Information Sciences Cross-Sectional Studies Documentation Family physicians Female General Practitioners - psychology Health care Humans Informatics Internal medicine Job satisfaction Male Medical personnel Medical Records Systems, Computerized Medical schools Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Patients People and Places Physicians Primary care Primary Health Care Professions Psychotherapy Referral and Consultation Research and Analysis Methods Social Sciences Surveys and Questionnaires Technology United Kingdom |
title | Computerization and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A07%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computerization%20and%20the%20future%20of%20primary%20care:%20A%20survey%20of%20general%20practitioners%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Blease,%20Charlotte&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0207418&rft.epage=e0207418&rft.pages=e0207418-e0207418&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0207418&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2155128870%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-80ffec14b7a532a953641f3ed27d9a87ea16a7e14ffee841b5458fdb676f8953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2155128870&rft_id=info:pmid/30540791&rfr_iscdi=true |