This shoe, that tiger: Semantic properties reflecting manual affordances of the referent modulate demonstrative use

Demonstrative reference is central to human communication. But what influences our choice of demonstrative forms such as "this" and "that" in discourse? Previous literature has mapped the use of such "proximal" and "distal" demonstratives onto spatial properti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2019-01, Vol.14 (1), p.e0210333-e0210333
Main Authors: Rocca, Roberta, Tylén, Kristian, Wallentin, Mikkel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Affordances (Psychology)
Analysis
Biology and Life Sciences
Distance Perception - physiology
Geospatial data
Human communication
Humans
Knowledge
Language
Language Development
Linguistics
Memory
Neurophysiology
Neurosciences
Parametric statistics
People and Places
Physical Sciences
Properties (attributes)
Research and Analysis Methods
Semantics
Semiotics
Social Sciences
Space Perception - physiology
Visual Perception - physiology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Demonstrative reference is central to human communication. But what influences our choice of demonstrative forms such as "this" and "that" in discourse? Previous literature has mapped the use of such "proximal" and "distal" demonstratives onto spatial properties of referents, such as their distance from the speaker. We investigated whether object semantics, and specifically functional properties of referents, also influence speakers' choices of either demonstrative form. Over two experiments, we presented English, Danish and Italian speakers with words denoting animate and inanimate objects, differing in size and harmfulness, and asked them to match them with a proximal or a distal demonstrative. Objects that offer more affordances for manipulation (smaller and harmless) elicited significantly more proximal demonstratives. These effects were stronger for inanimate referents, in line with the predictions of sensory-functional views on object semantics. These results suggest that demonstrative use may be partly grounded on manual affordances, and hints at the possibility of using demonstratives as a proxy to investigate the organization of semantic knowledge.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0210333