Evolution of the modular, disordered stress proteins known as dehydrins

• Published in: PloS one 2019-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e0211813-e0211813
• Main Authors: Riley, Andrew C, Ashlock, Daniel A, Graether, Steffen P
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abiotic stress; Analysis; Angiosperms; Binding sites; Bioinformatics; Biology and Life Sciences; Cellular biology; Computer and Information Sciences; Cycadopsida - genetics; Databases, Protein; Dehydration; Dehydration (Physiology); Dehydrin; Evolution; Evolution, Molecular; Gene Duplication; Gene expression; Gene sequencing; Genome, Plant; Genomes; Genomics; Gymnosperms; Heat shock proteins; Magnoliopsida - genetics; Phylogeny; Plant Proteins - genetics; Proteins; Reproduction (copying); Research and Analysis Methods; Segments; Stress proteins
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211813

Dehydrins, plant proteins that are upregulated during dehydration stress conditions, have modular sequences that can contain three conserved motifs (the Y-, S-, and K-segments). The presence and order of these motifs are used to classify dehydrins into one of five architectures: Kn, SKn, KnS, YnKn, and YnSKn, where the subscript n describes the number of copies of that motif. In this study, an architectural and phylogenetic analysis was performed on 426 dehydrin sequences that were identified in 53 angiosperm and 3 gymnosperm genomes. It was found that angiosperms contained all five architectures, while gymnosperms only contained Kn and SKn dehydrins. This suggests that the ancestral dehydrin in spermatophytes was either Kn or SKn, and the Y-segment containing dehydrins first arose in angiosperms. A high-level split between the YnSKn dehydrins from either the Kn or SKn dehydrins could not be confidently identified, however, two lower level architectural divisions appear to have occurred after different duplication events. The first likely occurred after a whole genome duplication, resulting in the duplication of a Y3SK2 dehydrin; the duplicate subsequently lost an S- and K- segment to become a Y3K1 dehydrin. The second split occurred after a tandem duplication of a Y1SK2 dehydrin, where the duplicate lost both the Y- and S- segment and gained four K-segments, resulting in a K6 dehydrin. We suggest that the newly arisen Y3K1 dehydrin is possibly on its way to pseudogenization, while the newly arisen K6 dehydrin developed a novel function in cold protection.