Loading…

The impact of bilingualism on executive functions and working memory in young adults

A bilingual advantage in a form of a better performance of bilinguals in tasks tapping into executive function abilities has been reported repeatedly in the literature. However, recent research defends that this advantage does not stem from bilingualism, but from uncontrolled factors or imperfectly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2019-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e0206770
Main Authors: Antón, Eneko, Carreiras, Manuel, Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e76d22f1f6aba4cac532c7a9c52e08dc7caa53984bcc3d9ec5eb034a7396a2b23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e76d22f1f6aba4cac532c7a9c52e08dc7caa53984bcc3d9ec5eb034a7396a2b23
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page e0206770
container_title PloS one
container_volume 14
creator Antón, Eneko
Carreiras, Manuel
Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni
description A bilingual advantage in a form of a better performance of bilinguals in tasks tapping into executive function abilities has been reported repeatedly in the literature. However, recent research defends that this advantage does not stem from bilingualism, but from uncontrolled factors or imperfectly matched samples. In this study we explored the potential impact of bilingualism on executive functioning abilities by testing large groups of young adult bilinguals and monolinguals in the tasks that were most extensively used when the advantages were reported. Importantly, the recently identified factors that could be disrupting the between groups comparisons were controlled for, and both groups were matched. We found no differences between groups in their performance. Additional bootstrapping analyses indicated that, when the bilingual advantage appeared, it very often co-occurred with unmatched socio-demographic factors. The evidence presented here indicates that the bilingual advantage might indeed be caused by spurious uncontrolled factors rather than bilingualism per se. Secondly, bilingualism has been argued to potentially affect working memory also. Therefore, we tested the same participants in both a forward and a backward version of a visual and an auditory working memory task. We found no differences between groups in either of the forward versions of the tasks, but bilinguals systematically outperformed monolinguals in the backward conditions. The results are analysed and interpreted taking into consideration different perspectives in the domain-specificity of the executive functions and working memory.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0206770
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2179684436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A573981635</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_bc1df983edb0417b9717bb40194d87c1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A573981635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e76d22f1f6aba4cac532c7a9c52e08dc7caa53984bcc3d9ec5eb034a7396a2b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKPxI5vkKaJj0qTJkHh1jpxnNbFsYudjPXf467Z1KBdIEv-fM577OM3y15iNMeU4w8bPwQHdr71Ts8RQYxz9Cg7xYKSGSOIPj6an2TPYtwgVNKKsafZCUW8FEiw02y5XOvcdFtQfe7bvDbWuNUA1sQu9y7XN1oNvbnWeTs41RvvYg6uyf_48CuBeac7H3a5cfnOD2kNzWD7-Dx70oKN-sU4nmU_Pn9aXnydXV59WVycX84UE6Sfac4aQlrcMqihUKBKShQHoUqiUdUorgBKKqqiVoo2QqtS14gWwKlgQGpCz7LXB92t9VGOBYmSYC5YVRSUJWJxIBoPG7kNpoOwkx6MvN3wYSUh9EZZLWuFm1ZUVDc1KjCvBU9dXSAsiqbiCietj2O2oe50o7TrA9iJ6PTEmbVc-WvJKE8yNAm8GwWC_z3o2MvORKWtBaf9sL93xUtcVIQn9M0_6MOvG6kVpAcY1_qUV-1F5XmZqlRhRstEzR-gUmt0Z1RyT2vS_iTg_SQgMb2-6VcwxCgX37_9P3v1c8q-PWLXGmy_jt4Ot7aagsUBVMHHGHR7X2SM5N78d9WQe_PL0fwp7NXxB90H3bmd_gXRUQAr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2179684436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of bilingualism on executive functions and working memory in young adults</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Antón, Eneko ; Carreiras, Manuel ; Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni</creator><contributor>Athanasopoulos, Panos</contributor><creatorcontrib>Antón, Eneko ; Carreiras, Manuel ; Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni ; Athanasopoulos, Panos</creatorcontrib><description>A bilingual advantage in a form of a better performance of bilinguals in tasks tapping into executive function abilities has been reported repeatedly in the literature. However, recent research defends that this advantage does not stem from bilingualism, but from uncontrolled factors or imperfectly matched samples. In this study we explored the potential impact of bilingualism on executive functioning abilities by testing large groups of young adult bilinguals and monolinguals in the tasks that were most extensively used when the advantages were reported. Importantly, the recently identified factors that could be disrupting the between groups comparisons were controlled for, and both groups were matched. We found no differences between groups in their performance. Additional bootstrapping analyses indicated that, when the bilingual advantage appeared, it very often co-occurred with unmatched socio-demographic factors. The evidence presented here indicates that the bilingual advantage might indeed be caused by spurious uncontrolled factors rather than bilingualism per se. Secondly, bilingualism has been argued to potentially affect working memory also. Therefore, we tested the same participants in both a forward and a backward version of a visual and an auditory working memory task. We found no differences between groups in either of the forward versions of the tasks, but bilinguals systematically outperformed monolinguals in the backward conditions. The results are analysed and interpreted taking into consideration different perspectives in the domain-specificity of the executive functions and working memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206770</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30759096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adults ; Analysis ; Auditory Perception ; Bilingualism ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Brain research ; Children &amp; youth ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Demographics ; Disruption ; Executive Function ; Female ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Memory ; Memory tasks ; Memory, Short-Term ; Mental task performance ; Multilingualism ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Noncitizens ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Sensory integration ; Short term memory ; Social Sciences ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Visual Perception ; Young Adult ; Young adults ; Youth</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e0206770</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Antón et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Antón et al 2019 Antón et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e76d22f1f6aba4cac532c7a9c52e08dc7caa53984bcc3d9ec5eb034a7396a2b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e76d22f1f6aba4cac532c7a9c52e08dc7caa53984bcc3d9ec5eb034a7396a2b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1971-978X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2179684436/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2179684436?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759096$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Athanasopoulos, Panos</contributor><creatorcontrib>Antón, Eneko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carreiras, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of bilingualism on executive functions and working memory in young adults</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>A bilingual advantage in a form of a better performance of bilinguals in tasks tapping into executive function abilities has been reported repeatedly in the literature. However, recent research defends that this advantage does not stem from bilingualism, but from uncontrolled factors or imperfectly matched samples. In this study we explored the potential impact of bilingualism on executive functioning abilities by testing large groups of young adult bilinguals and monolinguals in the tasks that were most extensively used when the advantages were reported. Importantly, the recently identified factors that could be disrupting the between groups comparisons were controlled for, and both groups were matched. We found no differences between groups in their performance. Additional bootstrapping analyses indicated that, when the bilingual advantage appeared, it very often co-occurred with unmatched socio-demographic factors. The evidence presented here indicates that the bilingual advantage might indeed be caused by spurious uncontrolled factors rather than bilingualism per se. Secondly, bilingualism has been argued to potentially affect working memory also. Therefore, we tested the same participants in both a forward and a backward version of a visual and an auditory working memory task. We found no differences between groups in either of the forward versions of the tasks, but bilinguals systematically outperformed monolinguals in the backward conditions. The results are analysed and interpreted taking into consideration different perspectives in the domain-specificity of the executive functions and working memory.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Disruption</subject><subject>Executive Function</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory tasks</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Mental task performance</subject><subject>Multilingualism</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Sensory integration</subject><subject>Short term memory</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKPxI5vkKaJj0qTJkHh1jpxnNbFsYudjPXf467Z1KBdIEv-fM577OM3y15iNMeU4w8bPwQHdr71Ts8RQYxz9Cg7xYKSGSOIPj6an2TPYtwgVNKKsafZCUW8FEiw02y5XOvcdFtQfe7bvDbWuNUA1sQu9y7XN1oNvbnWeTs41RvvYg6uyf_48CuBeac7H3a5cfnOD2kNzWD7-Dx70oKN-sU4nmU_Pn9aXnydXV59WVycX84UE6Sfac4aQlrcMqihUKBKShQHoUqiUdUorgBKKqqiVoo2QqtS14gWwKlgQGpCz7LXB92t9VGOBYmSYC5YVRSUJWJxIBoPG7kNpoOwkx6MvN3wYSUh9EZZLWuFm1ZUVDc1KjCvBU9dXSAsiqbiCietj2O2oe50o7TrA9iJ6PTEmbVc-WvJKE8yNAm8GwWC_z3o2MvORKWtBaf9sL93xUtcVIQn9M0_6MOvG6kVpAcY1_qUV-1F5XmZqlRhRstEzR-gUmt0Z1RyT2vS_iTg_SQgMb2-6VcwxCgX37_9P3v1c8q-PWLXGmy_jt4Ot7aagsUBVMHHGHR7X2SM5N78d9WQe_PL0fwp7NXxB90H3bmd_gXRUQAr</recordid><startdate>20190213</startdate><enddate>20190213</enddate><creator>Antón, Eneko</creator><creator>Carreiras, Manuel</creator><creator>Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1971-978X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190213</creationdate><title>The impact of bilingualism on executive functions and working memory in young adults</title><author>Antón, Eneko ; Carreiras, Manuel ; Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e76d22f1f6aba4cac532c7a9c52e08dc7caa53984bcc3d9ec5eb034a7396a2b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Disruption</topic><topic>Executive Function</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory tasks</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Mental task performance</topic><topic>Multilingualism</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Sensory integration</topic><topic>Short term memory</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antón, Eneko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carreiras, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antón, Eneko</au><au>Carreiras, Manuel</au><au>Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni</au><au>Athanasopoulos, Panos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of bilingualism on executive functions and working memory in young adults</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-02-13</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0206770</spage><pages>e0206770-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>A bilingual advantage in a form of a better performance of bilinguals in tasks tapping into executive function abilities has been reported repeatedly in the literature. However, recent research defends that this advantage does not stem from bilingualism, but from uncontrolled factors or imperfectly matched samples. In this study we explored the potential impact of bilingualism on executive functioning abilities by testing large groups of young adult bilinguals and monolinguals in the tasks that were most extensively used when the advantages were reported. Importantly, the recently identified factors that could be disrupting the between groups comparisons were controlled for, and both groups were matched. We found no differences between groups in their performance. Additional bootstrapping analyses indicated that, when the bilingual advantage appeared, it very often co-occurred with unmatched socio-demographic factors. The evidence presented here indicates that the bilingual advantage might indeed be caused by spurious uncontrolled factors rather than bilingualism per se. Secondly, bilingualism has been argued to potentially affect working memory also. Therefore, we tested the same participants in both a forward and a backward version of a visual and an auditory working memory task. We found no differences between groups in either of the forward versions of the tasks, but bilinguals systematically outperformed monolinguals in the backward conditions. The results are analysed and interpreted taking into consideration different perspectives in the domain-specificity of the executive functions and working memory.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30759096</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0206770</doi><tpages>e0206770</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1971-978X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2019-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e0206770
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2179684436
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Adults
Analysis
Auditory Perception
Bilingualism
Biology and Life Sciences
Brain research
Children & youth
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
Demographics
Disruption
Executive Function
Female
Humans
Language
Male
Memory
Memory tasks
Memory, Short-Term
Mental task performance
Multilingualism
Neuropsychological Tests
Noncitizens
People and Places
Physical Sciences
Research and Analysis Methods
Sensory integration
Short term memory
Social Sciences
Socioeconomic Factors
Visual Perception
Young Adult
Young adults
Youth
title The impact of bilingualism on executive functions and working memory in young adults
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A45%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20bilingualism%20on%20executive%20functions%20and%20working%20memory%20in%20young%20adults&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ant%C3%B3n,%20Eneko&rft.date=2019-02-13&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0206770&rft.pages=e0206770-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0206770&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA573981635%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-e76d22f1f6aba4cac532c7a9c52e08dc7caa53984bcc3d9ec5eb034a7396a2b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2179684436&rft_id=info:pmid/30759096&rft_galeid=A573981635&rfr_iscdi=true