Quality of delivery of "right@home": Implementation evaluation of an Australian sustained nurse home visiting intervention to improve parenting and the home learning environment

• Published in: PloS one 2019-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e0215371-e0215371
• Main Authors: Kemp, Lynn, Bruce, Tracey, Elcombe, Emma L, Anderson, Teresa, Vimpani, Graham, Price, Anna, Smith, Charlene, Goldfeld, Sharon
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Australia; Check lists; Checklist; Child health; Child, Preschool; Children; Children & youth; Childrens health; Delivery scheduling; Educational environment; Factor analysis; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Families & family life; Family; Female; Health visiting; Home environment; House Calls; Humans; Intervention; Male; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Midwifery; Nurse-patient relations; Nurses; Nursing - standards; Nursing schools; Parenting; People and Places; Population; Practice; Pregnancy; Prenatal Care - standards; Program Evaluation; Qualitative analysis; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods; Quality of Health Care; Retention; Schedules; School environment; Social Sciences; Treatment outcome; Visiting nurses; Wellness programs; Womens health
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215371

Home visiting programs are implemented in high income countries to improve outcomes for families with young children. Significant resources are invested in such programs and high quality evaluations are important. In the context of research trials, implementation quality is often poorly reported and, when reported, is variable. This paper presents the quality of implementation of the right@home program, a sustained nurse home visiting intervention trialled in Australia, and delivered in a 'real world' context through usual child and family health services. right@home is structured around the core Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-visiting (MECSH) program, which is a salutogenic, child focused prevention model. At each visit right@home practitioners completed a checklist detailing the client unique identifier, date of contact and activities undertaken. These checklists were collated to provide data on intervention dose, retention to program completion at child age 2 years, and visit content, which were compared with the program schedule. Quality of family-provider relationship was measured using the Session Rating Scale. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to identify clusters of activities and allow qualitative assessment of concordance between program aims and program delivery. Of 363 intervention families offered the program, 352 (97·0%) commenced the program and 304 (87·3%) completed the program to child age 2 years. 253 of 352 (71·9%) families who commenced the program received more than 75 percent of scheduled visits including at least one antenatal visit. Families rated the participant-practitioner relationship highly (mean 39.4/40). The factor analysis identified six antenatal and six postnatal components which were concordant with the program aims. The right@home program was delivered with higher adherence to program dose, schedule and content, and retention than usually reported in other home visiting research. Program compliance may have resulted from program design (visit schedule, dose, content and delivery flexibility) that was consistent with family aims.