Loading…

Opening the tap: Increased riverine connectivity strengthens marine food web pathways

Reduction of ecosystem connectivity has long-lasting impacts on food webs. Anadromous fish, which migrate from marine to freshwater ecosystems to complete reproduction, have seen their historically larger ecosystem role undercut by widespread riverine habitat fragmentation and other impacts mainly d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2019-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e0217008
Main Authors: Dias, Beatriz S, Frisk, Michael G, Jordaan, Adrian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-293c58410f30c2ebe1dcba4e77594a6aa9a4065e2c31172115278d2db0f7e54e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-293c58410f30c2ebe1dcba4e77594a6aa9a4065e2c31172115278d2db0f7e54e3
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page e0217008
container_title PloS one
container_volume 14
creator Dias, Beatriz S
Frisk, Michael G
Jordaan, Adrian
description Reduction of ecosystem connectivity has long-lasting impacts on food webs. Anadromous fish, which migrate from marine to freshwater ecosystems to complete reproduction, have seen their historically larger ecosystem role undercut by widespread riverine habitat fragmentation and other impacts mainly derived from anthropogenic sources. The result has been extensive extirpations and increased susceptibility to a suite of environmental factors that currently impede recovery. Under this present-day context of reduced productivity and connectivity, aggressive management actions and enforcement of catch limits including bycatch caps and complete moratoria on harvest have followed. What remains less understood are the implications of changes to food webs that co-occurred. What benefits restoration could provide in terms of ecosystem functioning in relation to economic costs associated with dam removal and remediation is unknown and can limit the scope and value of restoration activities. Here we employ, historical landscape-based biomass estimates of anadromous alosine for the first time in an ecosystem modeling of the Northeast US large marine ecosystem (LME), to evaluate the value of improving connectivity by measuring the increase in energy flow and population productivity. We compared a restored alosine model to a contemporary model, analyzing the impacts of the potential increase of connectivity between riverine and oceanic systems. There was the potential for a moderate biomass increase of piscivorous species with high economic value, including Atlantic cod, and for a major increase for species of conservation concern such as pelagic sharks, seabirds and marine mammals. Our study highlights the benefits of increased connectivity between freshwater and ocean ecosystems. We demonstrate the significant role anadromous forage fish could play in improving specific fisheries and overall ecosystem functioning, mainly through the diversification of species capable of transferring primary production to upper trophic levels, adding to benefits associated with their restoration.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0217008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2229633272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A586423557</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6bae609c6ebe4deb9ac14e9ee4a1accd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A586423557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-293c58410f30c2ebe1dcba4e77594a6aa9a4065e2c31172115278d2db0f7e54e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7of-A9GCIHgxYz7atPVCWBY_BhYG1PU2nKannQydpCaZWeffb3anu0xBQXKRcPKcNy9vTpK8omROeUE_rO3WGejngzU4J4wWhJRPklNacTYTjPCnR-eT5Mz7NSE5L4V4npxwShmpeHaaXC8HNNp0aVhhGmD4mC6Mcggem9TpHTptMFXWGFRB73TYpz44NF3EjU83cH_fWtukN1inA4TVDez9i-RZC73Hl-N-nlx_-fzz8tvsavl1cXlxNVOiYmHGKq7yMqOk5UQxrJE2qoYMiyKvMhAAFWRE5MhUNFwwSnNWlA1ratIWmGfIz5M3B92ht16OiXjJGKsE56xgkVgciMbCWg5OR8t7aUHL-4J1nQQXtOpRihpQkEqJaCRrsK5A0QwrxAwoKNVErU_ja9t6g41CExz0E9HpjdEr2dmdFDlnZVlFgbejgLO_t-jDPyyPVAfRlTatjWJqo72SF3kpMsbzvIjU_C9UXA1udPwwbHWsTxreTxoiE_BP6GDrvVz8-P7_7PLXlH13xK4Q-rDytt8GbY2fgtkBVM5677B9TI4SeTfSD2nIu5GW40jHttfHqT82PcwwvwU-I_LT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229633272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opening the tap: Increased riverine connectivity strengthens marine food web pathways</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Dias, Beatriz S ; Frisk, Michael G ; Jordaan, Adrian</creator><contributor>MacKenzie, Brian R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dias, Beatriz S ; Frisk, Michael G ; Jordaan, Adrian ; MacKenzie, Brian R.</creatorcontrib><description>Reduction of ecosystem connectivity has long-lasting impacts on food webs. Anadromous fish, which migrate from marine to freshwater ecosystems to complete reproduction, have seen their historically larger ecosystem role undercut by widespread riverine habitat fragmentation and other impacts mainly derived from anthropogenic sources. The result has been extensive extirpations and increased susceptibility to a suite of environmental factors that currently impede recovery. Under this present-day context of reduced productivity and connectivity, aggressive management actions and enforcement of catch limits including bycatch caps and complete moratoria on harvest have followed. What remains less understood are the implications of changes to food webs that co-occurred. What benefits restoration could provide in terms of ecosystem functioning in relation to economic costs associated with dam removal and remediation is unknown and can limit the scope and value of restoration activities. Here we employ, historical landscape-based biomass estimates of anadromous alosine for the first time in an ecosystem modeling of the Northeast US large marine ecosystem (LME), to evaluate the value of improving connectivity by measuring the increase in energy flow and population productivity. We compared a restored alosine model to a contemporary model, analyzing the impacts of the potential increase of connectivity between riverine and oceanic systems. There was the potential for a moderate biomass increase of piscivorous species with high economic value, including Atlantic cod, and for a major increase for species of conservation concern such as pelagic sharks, seabirds and marine mammals. Our study highlights the benefits of increased connectivity between freshwater and ocean ecosystems. We demonstrate the significant role anadromous forage fish could play in improving specific fisheries and overall ecosystem functioning, mainly through the diversification of species capable of transferring primary production to upper trophic levels, adding to benefits associated with their restoration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31120934</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Anadromous fishes ; Anadromous species ; Animals ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic birds ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Atlantic Ocean ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biomass ; Bycatch ; Cod ; Commercial fishing ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Dam effects ; Dam removal ; Dams ; Distribution ; Earth Sciences ; Ecological function ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Economic conditions ; Economic impact ; Economics ; Ecosystem models ; Ecosystems ; Energy flow ; Energy measurement ; Environment models ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental changes ; Environmental factors ; Environmental restoration ; Fish ; Fish conservation ; Fish migration ; Fish reproduction ; Fisheries ; Fishes ; Fishing ; Food Chain ; Food chains ; Food webs ; Foraging habitats ; Freshwater ecosystems ; Freshwater fish ; Habitat fragmentation ; Habitats ; Historical account ; Human influences ; Landscape ; Management ; Marine ecosystems ; Marine mammals ; Migration ; New England ; Primary production ; Production management ; Restoration ; Retirement benefits ; River ecology ; Rivers ; Schools ; Seabirds ; Sharks ; Trophic levels ; Watersheds ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e0217008</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Dias et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Dias et al 2019 Dias et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-293c58410f30c2ebe1dcba4e77594a6aa9a4065e2c31172115278d2db0f7e54e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-293c58410f30c2ebe1dcba4e77594a6aa9a4065e2c31172115278d2db0f7e54e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5905-4044</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2229633272/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2229633272?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120934$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>MacKenzie, Brian R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dias, Beatriz S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisk, Michael G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordaan, Adrian</creatorcontrib><title>Opening the tap: Increased riverine connectivity strengthens marine food web pathways</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Reduction of ecosystem connectivity has long-lasting impacts on food webs. Anadromous fish, which migrate from marine to freshwater ecosystems to complete reproduction, have seen their historically larger ecosystem role undercut by widespread riverine habitat fragmentation and other impacts mainly derived from anthropogenic sources. The result has been extensive extirpations and increased susceptibility to a suite of environmental factors that currently impede recovery. Under this present-day context of reduced productivity and connectivity, aggressive management actions and enforcement of catch limits including bycatch caps and complete moratoria on harvest have followed. What remains less understood are the implications of changes to food webs that co-occurred. What benefits restoration could provide in terms of ecosystem functioning in relation to economic costs associated with dam removal and remediation is unknown and can limit the scope and value of restoration activities. Here we employ, historical landscape-based biomass estimates of anadromous alosine for the first time in an ecosystem modeling of the Northeast US large marine ecosystem (LME), to evaluate the value of improving connectivity by measuring the increase in energy flow and population productivity. We compared a restored alosine model to a contemporary model, analyzing the impacts of the potential increase of connectivity between riverine and oceanic systems. There was the potential for a moderate biomass increase of piscivorous species with high economic value, including Atlantic cod, and for a major increase for species of conservation concern such as pelagic sharks, seabirds and marine mammals. Our study highlights the benefits of increased connectivity between freshwater and ocean ecosystems. We demonstrate the significant role anadromous forage fish could play in improving specific fisheries and overall ecosystem functioning, mainly through the diversification of species capable of transferring primary production to upper trophic levels, adding to benefits associated with their restoration.</description><subject>Anadromous fishes</subject><subject>Anadromous species</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Atlantic Ocean</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bycatch</subject><subject>Cod</subject><subject>Commercial fishing</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Dam effects</subject><subject>Dam removal</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystem models</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Energy flow</subject><subject>Energy measurement</subject><subject>Environment models</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish conservation</subject><subject>Fish migration</subject><subject>Fish reproduction</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Food webs</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Freshwater ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater fish</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Historical account</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>New England</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Production management</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Retirement benefits</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Seabirds</subject><subject>Sharks</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7of-A9GCIHgxYz7atPVCWBY_BhYG1PU2nKannQydpCaZWeffb3anu0xBQXKRcPKcNy9vTpK8omROeUE_rO3WGejngzU4J4wWhJRPklNacTYTjPCnR-eT5Mz7NSE5L4V4npxwShmpeHaaXC8HNNp0aVhhGmD4mC6Mcggem9TpHTptMFXWGFRB73TYpz44NF3EjU83cH_fWtukN1inA4TVDez9i-RZC73Hl-N-nlx_-fzz8tvsavl1cXlxNVOiYmHGKq7yMqOk5UQxrJE2qoYMiyKvMhAAFWRE5MhUNFwwSnNWlA1ratIWmGfIz5M3B92ht16OiXjJGKsE56xgkVgciMbCWg5OR8t7aUHL-4J1nQQXtOpRihpQkEqJaCRrsK5A0QwrxAwoKNVErU_ja9t6g41CExz0E9HpjdEr2dmdFDlnZVlFgbejgLO_t-jDPyyPVAfRlTatjWJqo72SF3kpMsbzvIjU_C9UXA1udPwwbHWsTxreTxoiE_BP6GDrvVz8-P7_7PLXlH13xK4Q-rDytt8GbY2fgtkBVM5677B9TI4SeTfSD2nIu5GW40jHttfHqT82PcwwvwU-I_LT</recordid><startdate>20190523</startdate><enddate>20190523</enddate><creator>Dias, Beatriz S</creator><creator>Frisk, Michael G</creator><creator>Jordaan, Adrian</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5905-4044</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190523</creationdate><title>Opening the tap: Increased riverine connectivity strengthens marine food web pathways</title><author>Dias, Beatriz S ; Frisk, Michael G ; Jordaan, Adrian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-293c58410f30c2ebe1dcba4e77594a6aa9a4065e2c31172115278d2db0f7e54e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anadromous fishes</topic><topic>Anadromous species</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Atlantic Ocean</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bycatch</topic><topic>Cod</topic><topic>Commercial fishing</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Dam effects</topic><topic>Dam removal</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystem models</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Energy flow</topic><topic>Energy measurement</topic><topic>Environment models</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish conservation</topic><topic>Fish migration</topic><topic>Fish reproduction</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Food webs</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Freshwater ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater fish</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Historical account</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>New England</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Production management</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Retirement benefits</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Seabirds</topic><topic>Sharks</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dias, Beatriz S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisk, Michael G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordaan, Adrian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dias, Beatriz S</au><au>Frisk, Michael G</au><au>Jordaan, Adrian</au><au>MacKenzie, Brian R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opening the tap: Increased riverine connectivity strengthens marine food web pathways</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-05-23</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0217008</spage><pages>e0217008-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Reduction of ecosystem connectivity has long-lasting impacts on food webs. Anadromous fish, which migrate from marine to freshwater ecosystems to complete reproduction, have seen their historically larger ecosystem role undercut by widespread riverine habitat fragmentation and other impacts mainly derived from anthropogenic sources. The result has been extensive extirpations and increased susceptibility to a suite of environmental factors that currently impede recovery. Under this present-day context of reduced productivity and connectivity, aggressive management actions and enforcement of catch limits including bycatch caps and complete moratoria on harvest have followed. What remains less understood are the implications of changes to food webs that co-occurred. What benefits restoration could provide in terms of ecosystem functioning in relation to economic costs associated with dam removal and remediation is unknown and can limit the scope and value of restoration activities. Here we employ, historical landscape-based biomass estimates of anadromous alosine for the first time in an ecosystem modeling of the Northeast US large marine ecosystem (LME), to evaluate the value of improving connectivity by measuring the increase in energy flow and population productivity. We compared a restored alosine model to a contemporary model, analyzing the impacts of the potential increase of connectivity between riverine and oceanic systems. There was the potential for a moderate biomass increase of piscivorous species with high economic value, including Atlantic cod, and for a major increase for species of conservation concern such as pelagic sharks, seabirds and marine mammals. Our study highlights the benefits of increased connectivity between freshwater and ocean ecosystems. We demonstrate the significant role anadromous forage fish could play in improving specific fisheries and overall ecosystem functioning, mainly through the diversification of species capable of transferring primary production to upper trophic levels, adding to benefits associated with their restoration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31120934</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0217008</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5905-4044</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2019-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e0217008
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2229633272
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central
subjects Anadromous fishes
Anadromous species
Animals
Anthropogenic factors
Aquatic birds
Aquatic ecosystems
Atlantic Ocean
Biology and Life Sciences
Biomass
Bycatch
Cod
Commercial fishing
Conservation
Conservation of Natural Resources
Dam effects
Dam removal
Dams
Distribution
Earth Sciences
Ecological function
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Economic conditions
Economic impact
Economics
Ecosystem models
Ecosystems
Energy flow
Energy measurement
Environment models
Environmental aspects
Environmental changes
Environmental factors
Environmental restoration
Fish
Fish conservation
Fish migration
Fish reproduction
Fisheries
Fishes
Fishing
Food Chain
Food chains
Food webs
Foraging habitats
Freshwater ecosystems
Freshwater fish
Habitat fragmentation
Habitats
Historical account
Human influences
Landscape
Management
Marine ecosystems
Marine mammals
Migration
New England
Primary production
Production management
Restoration
Retirement benefits
River ecology
Rivers
Schools
Seabirds
Sharks
Trophic levels
Watersheds
Wildlife conservation
title Opening the tap: Increased riverine connectivity strengthens marine food web pathways
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T16%3A42%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opening%20the%20tap:%20Increased%20riverine%20connectivity%20strengthens%20marine%20food%20web%20pathways&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Dias,%20Beatriz%20S&rft.date=2019-05-23&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0217008&rft.pages=e0217008-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0217008&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA586423557%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-293c58410f30c2ebe1dcba4e77594a6aa9a4065e2c31172115278d2db0f7e54e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229633272&rft_id=info:pmid/31120934&rft_galeid=A586423557&rfr_iscdi=true