The times, movements and operational efficiency of mechanized coffee harvesting in sloped areas

• Published in: PloS one 2019-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e0217286-e0217286
• Main Authors: Tavares, Tiago de Oliveira, de Oliveira, Bruno Rocca, Silva, Vantuir de Albuquerque, Pereira da Silva, Rouverson, Dos Santos, Adão Felipe, Okida, Estela Silva
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural engineering; Agricultural land; Agricultural practices; Agricultural production; Automation; Biology and Life Sciences; Brazil; Coffea - growth & development; Coffee; Coffee industry; Crop production; Crop Production - instrumentation; Crop Production - methods; Crop Production - statistics & numerical data; Crops; Crops, Agricultural - growth & development; Ecology and Environmental Sciences; Efficiency; Engineering and Technology; Farm machinery; Farmers; Farms; Harvest; Harvesters; Harvesting; Humans; Laboratories; Machinery; Mechanization; Methods; People and places; Physical Sciences; Physical work; Production management; Slopes; Time Factors; Workers
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217286

Coffee farms have been adopting the microterraces system, a technique that reduces the effect of the slope by moving the soil between the crop lines. In this way, all the mechanized operations can be carried out normally, except for harvesting, due to the work limitation of the harvesters, who work in areas with a maximum slope of 20%. One option is to use unilateral harvesters, which crop one side at a time; however, there has been no research on these microterrace machines to evaluate their performance and to compare it with those of the other harvesting methods in those regions. This study aimed to compare the mechanized harvest performance in the microterraces with the manual and semimechanized harvesting methods. The study was carried out in an agricultural area of the municipality of Ouro Fino / MG, Brazil, in a crop production site where the microterraces were built six years before the experiment. The treatments were assigned to a split-block design with seven repetitions and consisted of mechanized harvest-unilateral harvester with bag storage; manual harvest-regionally experienced workers; and semimechanized harvest-with portable breakers. Through an analysis of the times and movements, the operational efficiency and operational and effective field capabilities were measured. The adoption of microterraces allows the efficient mechanization of areas previously impossible to mechanize. The unilateral harvester is a potential tool for the partial replacement of manual labor in the harvest, performing a service equivalent to that of 23.68 manual workers and 10.55 manual workers in the semimechanized system.