Loading…
Attention promotes the neural encoding of prediction errors
The encoding of sensory information in the human brain is thought to be optimised by two principal processes: 'prediction' uses stored information to guide the interpretation of forthcoming sensory events, and 'attention' prioritizes these events according to their behavioural re...
Saved in:
Published in: | PLoS biology 2019-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e2006812-e2006812 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-5f9d60382d02110fbbc9a357840be608dd387ffb729935c67d19db6dbeadd4833 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-5f9d60382d02110fbbc9a357840be608dd387ffb729935c67d19db6dbeadd4833 |
container_end_page | e2006812 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e2006812 |
container_title | PLoS biology |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Smout, Cooper A Tang, Matthew F Garrido, Marta I Mattingley, Jason B |
description | The encoding of sensory information in the human brain is thought to be optimised by two principal processes: 'prediction' uses stored information to guide the interpretation of forthcoming sensory events, and 'attention' prioritizes these events according to their behavioural relevance. Despite the ubiquitous contributions of attention and prediction to various aspects of perception and cognition, it remains unknown how they interact to modulate information processing in the brain. A recent extension of predictive coding theory suggests that attention optimises the expected precision of predictions by modulating the synaptic gain of prediction error units. Because prediction errors code for the difference between predictions and sensory signals, this model would suggest that attention increases the selectivity for mismatch information in the neural response to a surprising stimulus. Alternative predictive coding models propose that attention increases the activity of prediction (or 'representation') neurons and would therefore suggest that attention and prediction synergistically modulate selectivity for 'feature information' in the brain. Here, we applied forward encoding models to neural activity recorded via electroencephalography (EEG) as human observers performed a simple visual task to test for the effect of attention on both mismatch and feature information in the neural response to surprising stimuli. Participants attended or ignored a periodic stream of gratings, the orientations of which could be either predictable, surprising, or unpredictable. We found that surprising stimuli evoked neural responses that were encoded according to the difference between predicted and observed stimulus features, and that attention facilitated the encoding of this type of information in the brain. These findings advance our understanding of how attention and prediction modulate information processing in the brain, as well as support the theory that attention optimises precision expectations during hierarchical inference by increasing the gain of prediction errors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006812 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2249959971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A577280348</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_04b65612e0d447e2a3c36a56cc9c49cc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A577280348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-5f9d60382d02110fbbc9a357840be608dd387ffb729935c67d19db6dbeadd4833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkluL1DAUx4so7jr6DUQHfNGHGXNpbgjCsHgZWFzw9hrS5LSboW3GpBX99mZ2ustW9kHJQ8LJ7_xPzj-nKJ5itMZU4Ne7MMbetOt95cOaIMQlJveKU8xKthJSsvu3zifFo5R2CBGiiHxYnFAkMaYSnxZvNsMA_eBDv9zH0IUB0nK4hGUPYzTtEnobnO-bZajzPThvr1CIMcT0uHhQmzbBk2lfFN_ev_t69nF1fvFhe7Y5X1mu2LBitXIcUUkcIhijuqqsMpQJWaIKOJLOUSnquhJEKcosFw4rV3FXgXGulJQuiudH3X0bkp76TpqQUimmlMCZ2B4JF8xO76PvTPytg_H6KhBio00cvG1Bo7LijGMCyJWlAGKopdwwbq2ypbI2a72dqo1VB85md7ITM9H5Te8vdRN-al5mT7nIAi8ngRh-jJAG3flkoW1ND2HM78ZSICIQO6Av_kLv7m6iGpMb8H0dcl17ENUbJgSRiGabFsX6DiovB523oYfa5_gs4dUsITMD_BoaM6akt18-_wf76d_Zi-9ztjyyNoaUItQ3PmOkD2N-bYg-jLmexjynPbv9RzdJ13NN_wCMa_ba</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2249959971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attention promotes the neural encoding of prediction errors</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Smout, Cooper A ; Tang, Matthew F ; Garrido, Marta I ; Mattingley, Jason B</creator><contributor>Seymour, Ben</contributor><creatorcontrib>Smout, Cooper A ; Tang, Matthew F ; Garrido, Marta I ; Mattingley, Jason B ; Seymour, Ben</creatorcontrib><description>The encoding of sensory information in the human brain is thought to be optimised by two principal processes: 'prediction' uses stored information to guide the interpretation of forthcoming sensory events, and 'attention' prioritizes these events according to their behavioural relevance. Despite the ubiquitous contributions of attention and prediction to various aspects of perception and cognition, it remains unknown how they interact to modulate information processing in the brain. A recent extension of predictive coding theory suggests that attention optimises the expected precision of predictions by modulating the synaptic gain of prediction error units. Because prediction errors code for the difference between predictions and sensory signals, this model would suggest that attention increases the selectivity for mismatch information in the neural response to a surprising stimulus. Alternative predictive coding models propose that attention increases the activity of prediction (or 'representation') neurons and would therefore suggest that attention and prediction synergistically modulate selectivity for 'feature information' in the brain. Here, we applied forward encoding models to neural activity recorded via electroencephalography (EEG) as human observers performed a simple visual task to test for the effect of attention on both mismatch and feature information in the neural response to surprising stimuli. Participants attended or ignored a periodic stream of gratings, the orientations of which could be either predictable, surprising, or unpredictable. We found that surprising stimuli evoked neural responses that were encoded according to the difference between predicted and observed stimulus features, and that attention facilitated the encoding of this type of information in the brain. These findings advance our understanding of how attention and prediction modulate information processing in the brain, as well as support the theory that attention optimises precision expectations during hierarchical inference by increasing the gain of prediction errors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-7885</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1544-9173</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-7885</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006812</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30811381</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Analysis ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Brain ; Brain - physiology ; Brain research ; Coding ; Coding theory ; Cognition ; Councils ; Data processing ; EEG ; Electroencephalography ; Encoding (Memory) ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Female ; Human performance ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Information processing ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Memory ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Neural coding ; Neurons ; Photic Stimulation ; Physical Sciences ; Predictions ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Selectivity ; Senses and sensation ; Social Sciences ; Stimuli ; Supervision ; Time Factors ; Visual observation ; Visual tasks ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PLoS biology, 2019-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e2006812-e2006812</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Smout et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Smout et al 2019 Smout et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-5f9d60382d02110fbbc9a357840be608dd387ffb729935c67d19db6dbeadd4833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-5f9d60382d02110fbbc9a357840be608dd387ffb729935c67d19db6dbeadd4833</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1144-3272</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2249959971/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2249959971?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811381$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Seymour, Ben</contributor><creatorcontrib>Smout, Cooper A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Matthew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrido, Marta I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattingley, Jason B</creatorcontrib><title>Attention promotes the neural encoding of prediction errors</title><title>PLoS biology</title><addtitle>PLoS Biol</addtitle><description>The encoding of sensory information in the human brain is thought to be optimised by two principal processes: 'prediction' uses stored information to guide the interpretation of forthcoming sensory events, and 'attention' prioritizes these events according to their behavioural relevance. Despite the ubiquitous contributions of attention and prediction to various aspects of perception and cognition, it remains unknown how they interact to modulate information processing in the brain. A recent extension of predictive coding theory suggests that attention optimises the expected precision of predictions by modulating the synaptic gain of prediction error units. Because prediction errors code for the difference between predictions and sensory signals, this model would suggest that attention increases the selectivity for mismatch information in the neural response to a surprising stimulus. Alternative predictive coding models propose that attention increases the activity of prediction (or 'representation') neurons and would therefore suggest that attention and prediction synergistically modulate selectivity for 'feature information' in the brain. Here, we applied forward encoding models to neural activity recorded via electroencephalography (EEG) as human observers performed a simple visual task to test for the effect of attention on both mismatch and feature information in the neural response to surprising stimuli. Participants attended or ignored a periodic stream of gratings, the orientations of which could be either predictable, surprising, or unpredictable. We found that surprising stimuli evoked neural responses that were encoded according to the difference between predicted and observed stimulus features, and that attention facilitated the encoding of this type of information in the brain. These findings advance our understanding of how attention and prediction modulate information processing in the brain, as well as support the theory that attention optimises precision expectations during hierarchical inference by increasing the gain of prediction errors.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Coding theory</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Encoding (Memory)</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neural coding</subject><subject>Neurons</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><subject>Senses and sensation</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Visual observation</subject><subject>Visual tasks</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1545-7885</issn><issn>1544-9173</issn><issn>1545-7885</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkluL1DAUx4so7jr6DUQHfNGHGXNpbgjCsHgZWFzw9hrS5LSboW3GpBX99mZ2ustW9kHJQ8LJ7_xPzj-nKJ5itMZU4Ne7MMbetOt95cOaIMQlJveKU8xKthJSsvu3zifFo5R2CBGiiHxYnFAkMaYSnxZvNsMA_eBDv9zH0IUB0nK4hGUPYzTtEnobnO-bZajzPThvr1CIMcT0uHhQmzbBk2lfFN_ev_t69nF1fvFhe7Y5X1mu2LBitXIcUUkcIhijuqqsMpQJWaIKOJLOUSnquhJEKcosFw4rV3FXgXGulJQuiudH3X0bkp76TpqQUimmlMCZ2B4JF8xO76PvTPytg_H6KhBio00cvG1Bo7LijGMCyJWlAGKopdwwbq2ypbI2a72dqo1VB85md7ITM9H5Te8vdRN-al5mT7nIAi8ngRh-jJAG3flkoW1ND2HM78ZSICIQO6Av_kLv7m6iGpMb8H0dcl17ENUbJgSRiGabFsX6DiovB523oYfa5_gs4dUsITMD_BoaM6akt18-_wf76d_Zi-9ztjyyNoaUItQ3PmOkD2N-bYg-jLmexjynPbv9RzdJ13NN_wCMa_ba</recordid><startdate>20190227</startdate><enddate>20190227</enddate><creator>Smout, Cooper A</creator><creator>Tang, Matthew F</creator><creator>Garrido, Marta I</creator><creator>Mattingley, Jason B</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>CZG</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1144-3272</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190227</creationdate><title>Attention promotes the neural encoding of prediction errors</title><author>Smout, Cooper A ; Tang, Matthew F ; Garrido, Marta I ; Mattingley, Jason B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-5f9d60382d02110fbbc9a357840be608dd387ffb729935c67d19db6dbeadd4833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Coding theory</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Encoding (Memory)</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neural coding</topic><topic>Neurons</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><topic>Senses and sensation</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Visual observation</topic><topic>Visual tasks</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smout, Cooper A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Matthew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrido, Marta I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattingley, Jason B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PLoS Biology</collection><jtitle>PLoS biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smout, Cooper A</au><au>Tang, Matthew F</au><au>Garrido, Marta I</au><au>Mattingley, Jason B</au><au>Seymour, Ben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attention promotes the neural encoding of prediction errors</atitle><jtitle>PLoS biology</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Biol</addtitle><date>2019-02-27</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e2006812</spage><epage>e2006812</epage><pages>e2006812-e2006812</pages><issn>1545-7885</issn><issn>1544-9173</issn><eissn>1545-7885</eissn><abstract>The encoding of sensory information in the human brain is thought to be optimised by two principal processes: 'prediction' uses stored information to guide the interpretation of forthcoming sensory events, and 'attention' prioritizes these events according to their behavioural relevance. Despite the ubiquitous contributions of attention and prediction to various aspects of perception and cognition, it remains unknown how they interact to modulate information processing in the brain. A recent extension of predictive coding theory suggests that attention optimises the expected precision of predictions by modulating the synaptic gain of prediction error units. Because prediction errors code for the difference between predictions and sensory signals, this model would suggest that attention increases the selectivity for mismatch information in the neural response to a surprising stimulus. Alternative predictive coding models propose that attention increases the activity of prediction (or 'representation') neurons and would therefore suggest that attention and prediction synergistically modulate selectivity for 'feature information' in the brain. Here, we applied forward encoding models to neural activity recorded via electroencephalography (EEG) as human observers performed a simple visual task to test for the effect of attention on both mismatch and feature information in the neural response to surprising stimuli. Participants attended or ignored a periodic stream of gratings, the orientations of which could be either predictable, surprising, or unpredictable. We found that surprising stimuli evoked neural responses that were encoded according to the difference between predicted and observed stimulus features, and that attention facilitated the encoding of this type of information in the brain. These findings advance our understanding of how attention and prediction modulate information processing in the brain, as well as support the theory that attention optimises precision expectations during hierarchical inference by increasing the gain of prediction errors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30811381</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pbio.2006812</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1144-3272</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1545-7885 |
ispartof | PLoS biology, 2019-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e2006812-e2006812 |
issn | 1545-7885 1544-9173 1545-7885 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2249959971 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Analysis Attention Attention - physiology Biology and Life Sciences Brain Brain - physiology Brain research Coding Coding theory Cognition Councils Data processing EEG Electroencephalography Encoding (Memory) Evoked Potentials - physiology Female Human performance Humans Hypotheses Information processing Male Medicine and Health Sciences Memory Methods Middle Aged Neural coding Neurons Photic Stimulation Physical Sciences Predictions Research and Analysis Methods Selectivity Senses and sensation Social Sciences Stimuli Supervision Time Factors Visual observation Visual tasks Young Adult |
title | Attention promotes the neural encoding of prediction errors |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T15%3A38%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attention%20promotes%20the%20neural%20encoding%20of%20prediction%20errors&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20biology&rft.au=Smout,%20Cooper%20A&rft.date=2019-02-27&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e2006812&rft.epage=e2006812&rft.pages=e2006812-e2006812&rft.issn=1545-7885&rft.eissn=1545-7885&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006812&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA577280348%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c695t-5f9d60382d02110fbbc9a357840be608dd387ffb729935c67d19db6dbeadd4833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2249959971&rft_id=info:pmid/30811381&rft_galeid=A577280348&rfr_iscdi=true |