Ten quick tips for getting the most scientific value out of numerical data

• Published in: PLoS computational biology 2018-10, Vol.14 (10), p.e1006141-e1006141
• Main Authors: Schwen, Lars Ole, Rueschenbaum, Sabrina
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biology and Life Sciences; Biomedical Research; Computer and Information Sciences; Data acquisition; Data Analysis; Data interpretation; Data processing; Data storage; Education; Errors; Humans; Laboratory animals; Monte Carlo simulation; Open access; Physical Sciences; Research and Analysis Methods; Research Design; Software; Statistical analysis; Statistical methods; Tips
• ISSN: 1553-7358; 1553-734X; 1553-7358
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006141

Most studies in the life sciences and other disciplines involve generating and analyzing numerical data of some type as the foundation for scientific findings. Working with numerical data involves multiple challenges. These include reproducible data acquisition, appropriate data storage, computationally correct data analysis, appropriate reporting and presentation of the results, and suitable data interpretation. Finding and correcting mistakes when analyzing and interpreting data can be frustrating and time-consuming. Presenting or publishing incorrect results is embarrassing but not uncommon. Particular sources of errors are inappropriate use of statistical methods and incorrect interpretation of data by software. To detect mistakes as early as possible, one should frequently check intermediate and final results for plausibility. Clearly documenting how quantities and results were obtained facilitates correcting mistakes. Properly understanding data is indispensable for reaching well-founded conclusions from experimental results. Units are needed to make sense of numbers, and uncertainty should be estimated to know how meaningful results are. Descriptive statistics and significance testing are useful tools for interpreting numerical results if applied correctly. However, blindly trusting in computed numbers can also be misleading, so it is worth thinking about how data should be summarized quantitatively to properly answer the question at hand. Finally, a suitable form of presentation is needed so that the data can properly support the interpretation and findings. By additionally sharing the relevant data, others can access, understand, and ultimately make use of the results. These quick tips are intended to provide guidelines for correctly interpreting, efficiently analyzing, and presenting numerical data in a useful way.