Loading…

The impact of imperfect screening tools on measuring the prevalence of epilepsy and headaches in Burkina Faso

Epilepsy and progressively worsening severe chronic headaches (WSCH) are the two most common clinical manifestations of neurocysticercosis, a form of cysticercosis. Most community-based studies in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) use a two-step approach (questionnaire and confirmation) to estimate the preva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2019-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e0007109-e0007109
Main Authors: Sahlu, Ida, Bauer, Cici, Ganaba, Rasmané, Preux, Pierre-Marie, Cowan, Linda D, Dorny, Pierre, Millogo, Athanase, Carabin, Hélène
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c658t-3159b9a1a7458566a694a194f65444add61647fcaa83911ff9904842fed140693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c658t-3159b9a1a7458566a694a194f65444add61647fcaa83911ff9904842fed140693
container_end_page e0007109
container_issue 1
container_start_page e0007109
container_title PLoS neglected tropical diseases
container_volume 13
creator Sahlu, Ida
Bauer, Cici
Ganaba, Rasmané
Preux, Pierre-Marie
Cowan, Linda D
Dorny, Pierre
Millogo, Athanase
Carabin, Hélène
description Epilepsy and progressively worsening severe chronic headaches (WSCH) are the two most common clinical manifestations of neurocysticercosis, a form of cysticercosis. Most community-based studies in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) use a two-step approach (questionnaire and confirmation) to estimate the prevalence of these neurological disorders and neurocysticercosis. Few validate the questionnaire in the field or account for the imperfect nature of the screening questionnaire and the fact that only those who screen positive have the opportunity to be confirmed. This study aims to obtain community-based validity estimates of a screening questionnaire, and to assess the impact of verification bias and misclassification error on prevalence estimates of epilepsy and WSCH. Baseline screening questionnaire followed by neurological examination data from a cluster randomized controlled trial collected between February 2011 and January 2012 were used. Bayesian latent-class models were applied to obtain verification bias adjusted validity estimates for the screening questionnaire. These models were also used to compare the adjusted prevalence estimates of epilepsy and WSCH to those directly obtained from the data (i.e. unadjusted prevalence estimates). Different priors were used and their corresponding posterior inference was compared for both WSCH and epilepsy. Screening data were available for 4768 individuals. For epilepsy, posterior estimates for the sensitivity varied with the priors used but remained robust for the specificity, with the highest estimates at 66.1% (95%BCI: 56.4%;75.3%) for sensitivity and 88.9% (88.0%;89.8%) for specificity. For WSCH, the sensitivity and specificity estimates remained robust, with the highest at 59.6% (49.7%;69.1%) and 88.6% (87.6%;89.6%), respectively. The unadjusted prevalence estimates were consistently lower than the adjusted prevalence estimates for both epilepsy and WSCH. This study demonstrates that in some settings, the prevalence of epilepsy and WSCH can be considerably underestimated when using the two-step approach. We provide an analytic solution to obtain more valid prevalence estimates of these neurological disorders, although more community-based validity studies are needed to reduce the uncertainty of the estimates. Valid estimates of these two neurological disorders are essential to obtain accurate burden values for neglected tropical diseases such as neurocysticercosis that manifest as epilepsy or WSCH. ClinicalTrials
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007109
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2262877910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A571883864</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7227472185be401c94f3b87d1682b8c7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A571883864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c658t-3159b9a1a7458566a694a194f65444add61647fcaa83911ff9904842fed140693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl9v0zAUxSMEYmPwDRBEQkLw0OIb_39BKhNjkyrxMp4t13Fal8QOdlJp3x5n7aZ2mvIQ--Z3jm-uT1G8BzQHzOHbNozR63be-6GeI4Q4IPmiOAeJ6azimL48Wp8Vb1LaIkQlFfC6OMOIUUxBnhfd7caWruu1GcrQTCsbG5s3yURrvfPrcgihTWXwZWd1GuN9KYv6aHe6td7YSWh719o-3ZXa1-XG6lqbjU2l8-WPMf51XpdXOoW3xatGt8m-O7wvij9XP28vr2fL379uLhfLmWFUDDMMVK6kBs0JFZQxzSTRIEnDKCFE1zUDRnhjtBZYAjSNlIgIUjW2BoKYxBfFx71v34akDpNKqqpYJTiXgDJxsyfqoLeqj67T8U4F7dR9IcS10nFwprWKVxUnvAJBV5YgMLkPvBK8BiaqlTA8e30_nDauOlsb64eo2xPT0y_ebdQ67BTDFFfAssHXvcHmiex6sVRTDYEUAgTsILNfDofF8G-0aVCdS8a2rfY2jPkfgUuCMBFTX5-eoM9P4kCt820q55uQezSTqVpQDkJgwUim5s9Q-alt50zwtsn3fyr4fCTIiWiHTQrtOLjg0ylI9qCJIaVom8cJAFJT0h-6VlPS1SHpWfbheOiPoodo4_8hevgP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2262877910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of imperfect screening tools on measuring the prevalence of epilepsy and headaches in Burkina Faso</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sahlu, Ida ; Bauer, Cici ; Ganaba, Rasmané ; Preux, Pierre-Marie ; Cowan, Linda D ; Dorny, Pierre ; Millogo, Athanase ; Carabin, Hélène</creator><contributor>Budke, Christine M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sahlu, Ida ; Bauer, Cici ; Ganaba, Rasmané ; Preux, Pierre-Marie ; Cowan, Linda D ; Dorny, Pierre ; Millogo, Athanase ; Carabin, Hélène ; Budke, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><description>Epilepsy and progressively worsening severe chronic headaches (WSCH) are the two most common clinical manifestations of neurocysticercosis, a form of cysticercosis. Most community-based studies in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) use a two-step approach (questionnaire and confirmation) to estimate the prevalence of these neurological disorders and neurocysticercosis. Few validate the questionnaire in the field or account for the imperfect nature of the screening questionnaire and the fact that only those who screen positive have the opportunity to be confirmed. This study aims to obtain community-based validity estimates of a screening questionnaire, and to assess the impact of verification bias and misclassification error on prevalence estimates of epilepsy and WSCH. Baseline screening questionnaire followed by neurological examination data from a cluster randomized controlled trial collected between February 2011 and January 2012 were used. Bayesian latent-class models were applied to obtain verification bias adjusted validity estimates for the screening questionnaire. These models were also used to compare the adjusted prevalence estimates of epilepsy and WSCH to those directly obtained from the data (i.e. unadjusted prevalence estimates). Different priors were used and their corresponding posterior inference was compared for both WSCH and epilepsy. Screening data were available for 4768 individuals. For epilepsy, posterior estimates for the sensitivity varied with the priors used but remained robust for the specificity, with the highest estimates at 66.1% (95%BCI: 56.4%;75.3%) for sensitivity and 88.9% (88.0%;89.8%) for specificity. For WSCH, the sensitivity and specificity estimates remained robust, with the highest at 59.6% (49.7%;69.1%) and 88.6% (87.6%;89.6%), respectively. The unadjusted prevalence estimates were consistently lower than the adjusted prevalence estimates for both epilepsy and WSCH. This study demonstrates that in some settings, the prevalence of epilepsy and WSCH can be considerably underestimated when using the two-step approach. We provide an analytic solution to obtain more valid prevalence estimates of these neurological disorders, although more community-based validity studies are needed to reduce the uncertainty of the estimates. Valid estimates of these two neurological disorders are essential to obtain accurate burden values for neglected tropical diseases such as neurocysticercosis that manifest as epilepsy or WSCH. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03095339.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007109</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30653519</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bayesian analysis ; Bias ; Burkina Faso - epidemiology ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Communities ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Cysticercosis ; Developing countries ; Development and progression ; Disease ; Disorders ; Epidemiology ; Epilepsy ; Epilepsy - diagnosis ; Epilepsy - epidemiology ; Estimates ; Exact solutions ; Female ; Headache ; Headache Disorders - diagnosis ; Headache Disorders - epidemiology ; Headaches ; Health sciences ; Health screening ; Humans ; Industrialized nations ; LDCs ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mathematical models ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neurocysticercosis - complications ; Neurologic examination ; Neurological diseases ; Neurological disorders ; People and Places ; Population ; Prevalence ; Probability theory ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Risk factors ; Rural areas ; Santé publique et épidémiologie ; Sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Specificity ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Systematic review ; Tropical climate ; Tropical diseases ; Validity ; Veterinary medicine ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e0007109-e0007109</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Sahlu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2019 Sahlu et al 2019 Sahlu et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c658t-3159b9a1a7458566a694a194f65444add61647fcaa83911ff9904842fed140693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c658t-3159b9a1a7458566a694a194f65444add61647fcaa83911ff9904842fed140693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2822-4730 ; 0000-0002-2171-2977</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2262877910/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2262877910?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30653519$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://unilim.hal.science/hal-01988181$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Budke, Christine M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sahlu, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Cici</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganaba, Rasmané</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preux, Pierre-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Linda D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorny, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millogo, Athanase</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carabin, Hélène</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of imperfect screening tools on measuring the prevalence of epilepsy and headaches in Burkina Faso</title><title>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</title><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><description>Epilepsy and progressively worsening severe chronic headaches (WSCH) are the two most common clinical manifestations of neurocysticercosis, a form of cysticercosis. Most community-based studies in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) use a two-step approach (questionnaire and confirmation) to estimate the prevalence of these neurological disorders and neurocysticercosis. Few validate the questionnaire in the field or account for the imperfect nature of the screening questionnaire and the fact that only those who screen positive have the opportunity to be confirmed. This study aims to obtain community-based validity estimates of a screening questionnaire, and to assess the impact of verification bias and misclassification error on prevalence estimates of epilepsy and WSCH. Baseline screening questionnaire followed by neurological examination data from a cluster randomized controlled trial collected between February 2011 and January 2012 were used. Bayesian latent-class models were applied to obtain verification bias adjusted validity estimates for the screening questionnaire. These models were also used to compare the adjusted prevalence estimates of epilepsy and WSCH to those directly obtained from the data (i.e. unadjusted prevalence estimates). Different priors were used and their corresponding posterior inference was compared for both WSCH and epilepsy. Screening data were available for 4768 individuals. For epilepsy, posterior estimates for the sensitivity varied with the priors used but remained robust for the specificity, with the highest estimates at 66.1% (95%BCI: 56.4%;75.3%) for sensitivity and 88.9% (88.0%;89.8%) for specificity. For WSCH, the sensitivity and specificity estimates remained robust, with the highest at 59.6% (49.7%;69.1%) and 88.6% (87.6%;89.6%), respectively. The unadjusted prevalence estimates were consistently lower than the adjusted prevalence estimates for both epilepsy and WSCH. This study demonstrates that in some settings, the prevalence of epilepsy and WSCH can be considerably underestimated when using the two-step approach. We provide an analytic solution to obtain more valid prevalence estimates of these neurological disorders, although more community-based validity studies are needed to reduce the uncertainty of the estimates. Valid estimates of these two neurological disorders are essential to obtain accurate burden values for neglected tropical diseases such as neurocysticercosis that manifest as epilepsy or WSCH. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03095339.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Burkina Faso - epidemiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Cysticercosis</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Disorders</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>Epilepsy - diagnosis</subject><subject>Epilepsy - epidemiology</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Exact solutions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Headache</subject><subject>Headache Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Headache Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Headaches</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Health screening</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurocysticercosis - complications</subject><subject>Neurologic examination</subject><subject>Neurological diseases</subject><subject>Neurological disorders</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Specificity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Tropical diseases</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><issn>1935-2735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl9v0zAUxSMEYmPwDRBEQkLw0OIb_39BKhNjkyrxMp4t13Fal8QOdlJp3x5n7aZ2mvIQ--Z3jm-uT1G8BzQHzOHbNozR63be-6GeI4Q4IPmiOAeJ6azimL48Wp8Vb1LaIkQlFfC6OMOIUUxBnhfd7caWruu1GcrQTCsbG5s3yURrvfPrcgihTWXwZWd1GuN9KYv6aHe6td7YSWh719o-3ZXa1-XG6lqbjU2l8-WPMf51XpdXOoW3xatGt8m-O7wvij9XP28vr2fL379uLhfLmWFUDDMMVK6kBs0JFZQxzSTRIEnDKCFE1zUDRnhjtBZYAjSNlIgIUjW2BoKYxBfFx71v34akDpNKqqpYJTiXgDJxsyfqoLeqj67T8U4F7dR9IcS10nFwprWKVxUnvAJBV5YgMLkPvBK8BiaqlTA8e30_nDauOlsb64eo2xPT0y_ebdQ67BTDFFfAssHXvcHmiex6sVRTDYEUAgTsILNfDofF8G-0aVCdS8a2rfY2jPkfgUuCMBFTX5-eoM9P4kCt820q55uQezSTqVpQDkJgwUim5s9Q-alt50zwtsn3fyr4fCTIiWiHTQrtOLjg0ylI9qCJIaVom8cJAFJT0h-6VlPS1SHpWfbheOiPoodo4_8hevgP</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Sahlu, Ida</creator><creator>Bauer, Cici</creator><creator>Ganaba, Rasmané</creator><creator>Preux, Pierre-Marie</creator><creator>Cowan, Linda D</creator><creator>Dorny, Pierre</creator><creator>Millogo, Athanase</creator><creator>Carabin, Hélène</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2822-4730</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2171-2977</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>The impact of imperfect screening tools on measuring the prevalence of epilepsy and headaches in Burkina Faso</title><author>Sahlu, Ida ; Bauer, Cici ; Ganaba, Rasmané ; Preux, Pierre-Marie ; Cowan, Linda D ; Dorny, Pierre ; Millogo, Athanase ; Carabin, Hélène</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c658t-3159b9a1a7458566a694a194f65444add61647fcaa83911ff9904842fed140693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Burkina Faso - epidemiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Cysticercosis</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Disorders</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>Epilepsy - diagnosis</topic><topic>Epilepsy - epidemiology</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Exact solutions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Headache</topic><topic>Headache Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Headache Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Headaches</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Health screening</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurocysticercosis - complications</topic><topic>Neurologic examination</topic><topic>Neurological diseases</topic><topic>Neurological disorders</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Santé publique et épidémiologie</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Specificity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Tropical diseases</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sahlu, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Cici</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganaba, Rasmané</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preux, Pierre-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Linda D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorny, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millogo, Athanase</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carabin, Hélène</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sahlu, Ida</au><au>Bauer, Cici</au><au>Ganaba, Rasmané</au><au>Preux, Pierre-Marie</au><au>Cowan, Linda D</au><au>Dorny, Pierre</au><au>Millogo, Athanase</au><au>Carabin, Hélène</au><au>Budke, Christine M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of imperfect screening tools on measuring the prevalence of epilepsy and headaches in Burkina Faso</atitle><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0007109</spage><epage>e0007109</epage><pages>e0007109-e0007109</pages><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><eissn>1935-2735</eissn><abstract>Epilepsy and progressively worsening severe chronic headaches (WSCH) are the two most common clinical manifestations of neurocysticercosis, a form of cysticercosis. Most community-based studies in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) use a two-step approach (questionnaire and confirmation) to estimate the prevalence of these neurological disorders and neurocysticercosis. Few validate the questionnaire in the field or account for the imperfect nature of the screening questionnaire and the fact that only those who screen positive have the opportunity to be confirmed. This study aims to obtain community-based validity estimates of a screening questionnaire, and to assess the impact of verification bias and misclassification error on prevalence estimates of epilepsy and WSCH. Baseline screening questionnaire followed by neurological examination data from a cluster randomized controlled trial collected between February 2011 and January 2012 were used. Bayesian latent-class models were applied to obtain verification bias adjusted validity estimates for the screening questionnaire. These models were also used to compare the adjusted prevalence estimates of epilepsy and WSCH to those directly obtained from the data (i.e. unadjusted prevalence estimates). Different priors were used and their corresponding posterior inference was compared for both WSCH and epilepsy. Screening data were available for 4768 individuals. For epilepsy, posterior estimates for the sensitivity varied with the priors used but remained robust for the specificity, with the highest estimates at 66.1% (95%BCI: 56.4%;75.3%) for sensitivity and 88.9% (88.0%;89.8%) for specificity. For WSCH, the sensitivity and specificity estimates remained robust, with the highest at 59.6% (49.7%;69.1%) and 88.6% (87.6%;89.6%), respectively. The unadjusted prevalence estimates were consistently lower than the adjusted prevalence estimates for both epilepsy and WSCH. This study demonstrates that in some settings, the prevalence of epilepsy and WSCH can be considerably underestimated when using the two-step approach. We provide an analytic solution to obtain more valid prevalence estimates of these neurological disorders, although more community-based validity studies are needed to reduce the uncertainty of the estimates. Valid estimates of these two neurological disorders are essential to obtain accurate burden values for neglected tropical diseases such as neurocysticercosis that manifest as epilepsy or WSCH. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03095339.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>30653519</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pntd.0007109</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2822-4730</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2171-2977</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-2735
ispartof PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e0007109-e0007109
issn 1935-2735
1935-2727
1935-2735
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2262877910
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bayesian analysis
Bias
Burkina Faso - epidemiology
Child
Child, Preschool
Communities
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cysticercosis
Developing countries
Development and progression
Disease
Disorders
Epidemiology
Epilepsy
Epilepsy - diagnosis
Epilepsy - epidemiology
Estimates
Exact solutions
Female
Headache
Headache Disorders - diagnosis
Headache Disorders - epidemiology
Headaches
Health sciences
Health screening
Humans
Industrialized nations
LDCs
Life Sciences
Male
Mass Screening - methods
Mathematical models
Medical research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Middle Aged
Neurocysticercosis - complications
Neurologic examination
Neurological diseases
Neurological disorders
People and Places
Population
Prevalence
Probability theory
Public health
Questionnaires
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Research and Analysis Methods
Risk factors
Rural areas
Santé publique et épidémiologie
Sensitivity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specificity
Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Systematic review
Tropical climate
Tropical diseases
Validity
Veterinary medicine
Young Adult
title The impact of imperfect screening tools on measuring the prevalence of epilepsy and headaches in Burkina Faso
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A35%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20imperfect%20screening%20tools%20on%20measuring%20the%20prevalence%20of%20epilepsy%20and%20headaches%20in%20Burkina%20Faso&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20neglected%20tropical%20diseases&rft.au=Sahlu,%20Ida&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0007109&rft.epage=e0007109&rft.pages=e0007109-e0007109&rft.issn=1935-2735&rft.eissn=1935-2735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007109&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA571883864%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c658t-3159b9a1a7458566a694a194f65444add61647fcaa83911ff9904842fed140693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2262877910&rft_id=info:pmid/30653519&rft_galeid=A571883864&rfr_iscdi=true