Quantitative causal selection patterns in token causation

When many events contributed to an outcome, people consistently judge some more causal than others, based in part on the prior probabilities of those events. For instance, when a tree bursts into flames, people judge the lightning strike more of a cause than the presence of oxygen in the air-in part...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2019-08, Vol.14 (8), p.e0219704-e0219704
Main Authors: Morris, Adam, Phillips, Jonathan, Gerstenberg, Tobias, Cushman, Fiery
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Arson
Attitude
Biology and Life Sciences
Causality
Causation
Causation (Philosophy)
Computer and Information Sciences
Deflation (Economics)
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Experimental psychology
Humans
Intention
Judgment (Psychology)
Judgment - physiology
Judgments
Lightning
Lightning strikes
Models, Psychological
Novels
Oxygen
Philosophy
Physical Sciences
Probability
Psychology
Qualitative reasoning
Research and Analysis Methods
Social Sciences
Theory
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c12619865993185adcc57ee9202d2d889294da77c3391d3f7a689da8d772c6f13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c12619865993185adcc57ee9202d2d889294da77c3391d3f7a689da8d772c6f13
container_end_page e0219704
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0219704
container_title PloS one
container_volume 14
creator Morris, Adam
Phillips, Jonathan
Gerstenberg, Tobias
Cushman, Fiery
description When many events contributed to an outcome, people consistently judge some more causal than others, based in part on the prior probabilities of those events. For instance, when a tree bursts into flames, people judge the lightning strike more of a cause than the presence of oxygen in the air-in part because oxygen is so common, and lightning strikes are so rare. These effects, which play a major role in several prominent theories of token causation, have largely been studied through qualitative manipulations of the prior probabilities. Yet, there is good reason to think that people's causal judgments are on a continuum-and relatively little is known about how these judgments vary quantitatively as the prior probabilities change. In this paper, we measure people's causal judgment across parametric manipulations of the prior probabilities of antecedent events. Our experiments replicate previous qualitative findings, and also reveal several novel patterns that are not well-described by existing theories.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0219704
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2267773962</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A595205788</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7fe378a4f8ee426dba395f700a29729a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A595205788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c12619865993185adcc57ee9202d2d889294da77c3391d3f7a689da8d772c6f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkltrFDEUxwdRbK1-A9EFQfRh11wmtxehFC8LheL1NZwmmd2ss8l2kin67c10p2VH-iB5SEh-539yzvlX1XOMFpgK_G4T-y5Au9jF4BaIYCVQ_aA6xoqSOSeIPjw4H1VPUtogxKjk_HF1RDHlisn6uFJfegjZZ8j-2s0M9AnaWXKtM9nHMNtBzq4LaebDLMdfLuyR4e1p9aiBNrln435S_fj44fvZ5_n5xafl2en53HBF8txgwrGSnClFsWRgjWHCOUUQscRKqYiqLQhhKFXY0kYAl8qCtEIQwxtMT6qXe91dG5Meq06aEC6EoIqTQiz3hI2w0bvOb6H7oyN4fXMRu5WGLnvTOi0aR4WEupHO1YTbS6CKNQIhIEoQBUXr_Zitv9w6a1zIHbQT0elL8Gu9iteac8GQqovAm1Ggi1e9S1lvfTKubSG42N_8W1LMKBoqe_UPen91I7WCUoAPTSx5zSCqT5liBDEhZaEW91BlWbf1plik8eV-EvB2ElCY7H7nVRlv0stvX_-fvfg5ZV8fsGsHbV6n2PaDZdIUrPeg6WJKnWvumoyRHhx-2w09OFyPDi9hLw4HdBd0a2n6FyUB9MY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2267773962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative causal selection patterns in token causation</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Morris, Adam ; Phillips, Jonathan ; Gerstenberg, Tobias ; Cushman, Fiery</creator><contributor>Capraro, Valerio</contributor><creatorcontrib>Morris, Adam ; Phillips, Jonathan ; Gerstenberg, Tobias ; Cushman, Fiery ; Capraro, Valerio</creatorcontrib><description>When many events contributed to an outcome, people consistently judge some more causal than others, based in part on the prior probabilities of those events. For instance, when a tree bursts into flames, people judge the lightning strike more of a cause than the presence of oxygen in the air-in part because oxygen is so common, and lightning strikes are so rare. These effects, which play a major role in several prominent theories of token causation, have largely been studied through qualitative manipulations of the prior probabilities. Yet, there is good reason to think that people's causal judgments are on a continuum-and relatively little is known about how these judgments vary quantitatively as the prior probabilities change. In this paper, we measure people's causal judgment across parametric manipulations of the prior probabilities of antecedent events. Our experiments replicate previous qualitative findings, and also reveal several novel patterns that are not well-described by existing theories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219704</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31369584</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Arson ; Attitude ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Causality ; Causation ; Causation (Philosophy) ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Deflation (Economics) ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Experimental psychology ; Humans ; Intention ; Judgment (Psychology) ; Judgment - physiology ; Judgments ; Lightning ; Lightning strikes ; Models, Psychological ; Novels ; Oxygen ; Philosophy ; Physical Sciences ; Probability ; Psychology ; Qualitative reasoning ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social Sciences ; Theory</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-08, Vol.14 (8), p.e0219704-e0219704</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2019 Morris et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Morris et al 2019 Morris et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c12619865993185adcc57ee9202d2d889294da77c3391d3f7a689da8d772c6f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c12619865993185adcc57ee9202d2d889294da77c3391d3f7a689da8d772c6f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8810-8694</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2267773962/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2267773962?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25733,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53769,53771,74872</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31369584$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Capraro, Valerio</contributor><creatorcontrib>Morris, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstenberg, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cushman, Fiery</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative causal selection patterns in token causation</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>When many events contributed to an outcome, people consistently judge some more causal than others, based in part on the prior probabilities of those events. For instance, when a tree bursts into flames, people judge the lightning strike more of a cause than the presence of oxygen in the air-in part because oxygen is so common, and lightning strikes are so rare. These effects, which play a major role in several prominent theories of token causation, have largely been studied through qualitative manipulations of the prior probabilities. Yet, there is good reason to think that people's causal judgments are on a continuum-and relatively little is known about how these judgments vary quantitatively as the prior probabilities change. In this paper, we measure people's causal judgment across parametric manipulations of the prior probabilities of antecedent events. Our experiments replicate previous qualitative findings, and also reveal several novel patterns that are not well-described by existing theories.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Arson</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Causation</subject><subject>Causation (Philosophy)</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Deflation (Economics)</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Judgment (Psychology)</subject><subject>Judgment - physiology</subject><subject>Judgments</subject><subject>Lightning</subject><subject>Lightning strikes</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Novels</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Qualitative reasoning</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkltrFDEUxwdRbK1-A9EFQfRh11wmtxehFC8LheL1NZwmmd2ss8l2kin67c10p2VH-iB5SEh-539yzvlX1XOMFpgK_G4T-y5Au9jF4BaIYCVQ_aA6xoqSOSeIPjw4H1VPUtogxKjk_HF1RDHlisn6uFJfegjZZ8j-2s0M9AnaWXKtM9nHMNtBzq4LaebDLMdfLuyR4e1p9aiBNrln435S_fj44fvZ5_n5xafl2en53HBF8txgwrGSnClFsWRgjWHCOUUQscRKqYiqLQhhKFXY0kYAl8qCtEIQwxtMT6qXe91dG5Meq06aEC6EoIqTQiz3hI2w0bvOb6H7oyN4fXMRu5WGLnvTOi0aR4WEupHO1YTbS6CKNQIhIEoQBUXr_Zitv9w6a1zIHbQT0elL8Gu9iteac8GQqovAm1Ggi1e9S1lvfTKubSG42N_8W1LMKBoqe_UPen91I7WCUoAPTSx5zSCqT5liBDEhZaEW91BlWbf1plik8eV-EvB2ElCY7H7nVRlv0stvX_-fvfg5ZV8fsGsHbV6n2PaDZdIUrPeg6WJKnWvumoyRHhx-2w09OFyPDi9hLw4HdBd0a2n6FyUB9MY</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Morris, Adam</creator><creator>Phillips, Jonathan</creator><creator>Gerstenberg, Tobias</creator><creator>Cushman, Fiery</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8810-8694</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Quantitative causal selection patterns in token causation</title><author>Morris, Adam ; Phillips, Jonathan ; Gerstenberg, Tobias ; Cushman, Fiery</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c12619865993185adcc57ee9202d2d889294da77c3391d3f7a689da8d772c6f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Arson</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Causation</topic><topic>Causation (Philosophy)</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Deflation (Economics)</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Judgment (Psychology)</topic><topic>Judgment - physiology</topic><topic>Judgments</topic><topic>Lightning</topic><topic>Lightning strikes</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Novels</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Qualitative reasoning</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstenberg, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cushman, Fiery</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, Adam</au><au>Phillips, Jonathan</au><au>Gerstenberg, Tobias</au><au>Cushman, Fiery</au><au>Capraro, Valerio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative causal selection patterns in token causation</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0219704</spage><epage>e0219704</epage><pages>e0219704-e0219704</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>When many events contributed to an outcome, people consistently judge some more causal than others, based in part on the prior probabilities of those events. For instance, when a tree bursts into flames, people judge the lightning strike more of a cause than the presence of oxygen in the air-in part because oxygen is so common, and lightning strikes are so rare. These effects, which play a major role in several prominent theories of token causation, have largely been studied through qualitative manipulations of the prior probabilities. Yet, there is good reason to think that people's causal judgments are on a continuum-and relatively little is known about how these judgments vary quantitatively as the prior probabilities change. In this paper, we measure people's causal judgment across parametric manipulations of the prior probabilities of antecedent events. Our experiments replicate previous qualitative findings, and also reveal several novel patterns that are not well-described by existing theories.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31369584</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0219704</doi><tpages>e0219704</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8810-8694</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2019-08, Vol.14 (8), p.e0219704-e0219704
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2267773962
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Analysis
Arson
Attitude
Biology and Life Sciences
Causality
Causation
Causation (Philosophy)
Computer and Information Sciences
Deflation (Economics)
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Experimental psychology
Humans
Intention
Judgment (Psychology)
Judgment - physiology
Judgments
Lightning
Lightning strikes
Models, Psychological
Novels
Oxygen
Philosophy
Physical Sciences
Probability
Psychology
Qualitative reasoning
Research and Analysis Methods
Social Sciences
Theory
title Quantitative causal selection patterns in token causation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A12%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20causal%20selection%20patterns%20in%20token%20causation&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Morris,%20Adam&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0219704&rft.epage=e0219704&rft.pages=e0219704-e0219704&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0219704&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA595205788%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c12619865993185adcc57ee9202d2d889294da77c3391d3f7a689da8d772c6f13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2267773962&rft_id=info:pmid/31369584&rft_galeid=A595205788&rfr_iscdi=true