The feasibility of using citizens to segment anatomy from medical images: Accuracy and motivation

• Published in: PloS one 2019-10, Vol.14 (10), p.e0222523
• Main Authors: Meakin, Judith R, Ames, Ryan M, Jeynes, J Charles G, Welsman, Jo, Gundry, Michael, Knapp, Karen, Everson, Richard
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Anatomy; Biology and Life Sciences; Citizen Science - methods; Computer and Information Sciences; Datasets; Diagnostic imaging; Engineering and Technology; Engineering schools; Experts; Feasibility; Feasibility Studies; Female; Focus groups; Health Services Research - methods; Humans; Image processing; Image segmentation; Magnetic resonance; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Male; Medical imaging; Medical imaging equipment; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Middle Aged; Motivation; Physical Sciences; Public involvement; Questionnaires; Radiation therapy; Research and Analysis Methods; Researchers; Science education; Science Policy; Scientometrics; Software; Spine; Spine - diagnostic imaging; Studies; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222523

The development of automatic methods for segmenting anatomy from medical images is an important goal for many medical and healthcare research areas. Datasets that can be used to train and test computer algorithms, however, are often small due to the difficulties in obtaining experts to segment enough examples. Citizen science provides a potential solution to this problem but the feasibility of using the public to identify and segment anatomy in a medical image has not been investigated. Our study therefore aimed to explore the feasibility, in terms of performance and motivation, of using citizens for such purposes. Public involvement was woven into the study design and evaluation. Twenty-nine citizens were recruited and, after brief training, asked to segment the spine from a dataset of 150 magnetic resonance images. Participants segmented as many images as they could within three one-hour sessions. Their accuracy was evaluated by comparing them, as individuals and as a combined consensus, to the segmentations of three experts. Questionnaires and a focus group were used to determine the citizens' motivation for taking part and their experience of the study. Citizen segmentation accuracy, in terms of agreement with the expert consensus segmentation, varied considerably between individual citizens. The citizen consensus, however, was close to the expert consensus, indicating that when pooled, citizens may be able to replace or supplement experts for generating large image datasets. Personal interest and a desire to help were the two most common reasons for taking part in the study.