Perception of potential harm and benefits of HIV vaccine trial participation: A qualitative study from urban Tanzania

• Published in: PloS one 2019-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e0224831
• Main Authors: Tarimo, Edith A M, Ambikile, Joel, Munseri, Patricia, Bakari, Muhammad
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome; Adult; AIDS; AIDS vaccines; AIDS Vaccines - adverse effects; Analysis; Biology and life sciences; Clinical trials; Community involvement; Community participation; Female; Health aspects; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Health services; HIV; HIV infections; HIV Infections - epidemiology; HIV Infections - prevention & control; Human immunodeficiency virus; Humans; Immunization; Incentives; Infection; Knowledge acquisition; Male; Medical research; Medicine and health sciences; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; People and Places; Perception; Qualitative Research; Retirement benefits; Scientists; Social aspects; Social Sciences; Tanzania - epidemiology; Vaccines
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224831

The development of an effective preventive HIV vaccine is the best-known option to halt incident HIV infections. Participants in HIV vaccine trials may possess expectations shaped by existing socio-cultural contexts that are important to understand to allow for improved trial design. Here, we describe post-phase I/II HIV vaccine trial perceptions within participating communities in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. This descriptive qualitative study was conducted in May 2016. We conducted eight focus group discussions, each consisting of 5 to 12 participants. Four groups comprised of the past phase I/II HIV vaccine trial participants and four groups involved those who did not participate. We used a thematic analysis approach. Ongoing concerns existed among non-vaccine trial participants who believed that those who participated in HIV vaccine trials were infected with HIV. Limited post-HIV vaccine trial result dissemination, the pre-existing negative beliefs about vaccines, and experiences from other previous medical experiments fueled these concerns. The participants anticipated that broader dissemination of facts regarding HIV vaccine trials using media, former volunteers, and flyers would reduce the reported concerns. In contrast, some participants embraced the benefits gained through participating in HIV vaccine trials. HIV vaccine trial participants appreciated trial interventions, such as health status check-ups, knowledge acquisition, and facilitation of access to medical services. They envisioned mutual benefits in the form of community protection and capacity building among the local scientists. The future conduct of HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania requires wider community dissemination of information and post-trial feedback to alleviate concerns among the participating communities. Interventions such as medical services may represent essential incentives to the HIV vaccine trial volunteers. In future HIV vaccine trials, it is crucial to boost individual and perceived mutual benefits.