Loading…

Heterogenous wealth effects of minimum unit price on purchase of alcohol: Evidence using scanner data

One of the key arguments given to oppose the "sin taxes" is that they are regressive in nature and place disproportionately higher cost on the poor thereby reducing their net wealth. The response to a reduction in net wealth attributed to tax can potentially have significant effects throug...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2019-12, Vol.14 (12), p.e0225538-e0225538
Main Authors: Sharma, Anurag, Vandenberg, Brian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-6992ab8db22e31ce0703837084a2f3dde3eb9d585c7e07d724227d7dbccd64a43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-6992ab8db22e31ce0703837084a2f3dde3eb9d585c7e07d724227d7dbccd64a43
container_end_page e0225538
container_issue 12
container_start_page e0225538
container_title PloS one
container_volume 14
creator Sharma, Anurag
Vandenberg, Brian
description One of the key arguments given to oppose the "sin taxes" is that they are regressive in nature and place disproportionately higher cost on the poor thereby reducing their net wealth. The response to a reduction in net wealth attributed to tax can potentially have significant effects through an increase in alcohol purchase by heavy drinkers reinforcing or even offsetting the direct price or substitution effect of these taxes in reducing alcohol consumption. Comparatively little is known empirically about the net wealth effect associated with changes in alcohol tax policy, and this study aims to help fill this gap in the literature. In this study we aim to estimate how the wealth effects of introducing a minimum unit price (MUP) of A$2.00 per standard drink vary over the distribution (quantiles) of alcohol consumers. The data used in this study is a longitudinal panel of 1,395 households' daily alcohol purchases (scanner data) recorded over a full year. Our analysis involves (i) quantile regression to estimate income elasticity over the distribution of consumption, and (ii) using these elasticities to estimate the potential wealth effects of a hypothetical change in alcohol prices from introducing an MUP policy. We control for consumer demographic characteristics, alcohol product prices and prices of close substitutes, and quarterly seasonal effects. We find that the estimated wealth effect from increasing the price of alcohol under a MUP policy is not significant at any point over the distribution of alcohol consumers. The policy increases per capita tax impact by less than A$5.00 per week for light/moderate consumers (50th-80th quantile) and decreases their daily per capita alcohol consumption by less than 0.02 standard drinks. Wealth effects attributable to an MUP policy are likely to be negligible. Substitution effects of the policy dominate the wealth effects in generating key health related outcomes such as reductions in alcohol consumption.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0225538
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2322136899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8c3bd7fb63394f3284ccd65888222468</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2322727397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-6992ab8db22e31ce0703837084a2f3dde3eb9d585c7e07d724227d7dbccd64a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsceGyizNObIdDJVQVWqkSFzhbjj3Z9cqxFzsp4u3xdtOqRZzG8nzzz4z9V9Xbmq5rJupPuzinoP16HwOuKUDbMvmsOq07BisOlD1_dD6pXuW8o7QgnL-sTlgtaUtFd1rhFU6Y4gZDnDP5jdpPW4LDgGbKJA5kdMGN80jm4CayT84giYHs52S2OuOB0N7EbfSfyeWtsxgKMGcXNiQbHQImYvWkX1cvBu0zvlniWfXz6-WPi6vVzfdv1xdfblamBT6teNeB7qXtAZDVBqmgTDJBZaNhYNYiw76zrWyNKDkroAEowfbGWN7ohp1V74-6ex-zWl4oK2AANeOy6wpxfSRs1DtVFhp1-qOiduruIqaN0mlyxqOShvVWDD1nrGsGBrI5tGmllADQcFm0zpducz-iNRimpP0T0aeZ4LZqE29VmaSRvC0CHxeBFH_NmCc1umzQex2wfMfd3AIE60RBP_yD_n-75kiZFHNOODwMU1N1cM19lTq4Ri2uKWXvHi_yUHRvE_YXRvHBCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322136899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heterogenous wealth effects of minimum unit price on purchase of alcohol: Evidence using scanner data</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Sharma, Anurag ; Vandenberg, Brian</creator><contributor>McCollister, Kathryn E.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Anurag ; Vandenberg, Brian ; McCollister, Kathryn E.</creatorcontrib><description>One of the key arguments given to oppose the "sin taxes" is that they are regressive in nature and place disproportionately higher cost on the poor thereby reducing their net wealth. The response to a reduction in net wealth attributed to tax can potentially have significant effects through an increase in alcohol purchase by heavy drinkers reinforcing or even offsetting the direct price or substitution effect of these taxes in reducing alcohol consumption. Comparatively little is known empirically about the net wealth effect associated with changes in alcohol tax policy, and this study aims to help fill this gap in the literature. In this study we aim to estimate how the wealth effects of introducing a minimum unit price (MUP) of A$2.00 per standard drink vary over the distribution (quantiles) of alcohol consumers. The data used in this study is a longitudinal panel of 1,395 households' daily alcohol purchases (scanner data) recorded over a full year. Our analysis involves (i) quantile regression to estimate income elasticity over the distribution of consumption, and (ii) using these elasticities to estimate the potential wealth effects of a hypothetical change in alcohol prices from introducing an MUP policy. We control for consumer demographic characteristics, alcohol product prices and prices of close substitutes, and quarterly seasonal effects. We find that the estimated wealth effect from increasing the price of alcohol under a MUP policy is not significant at any point over the distribution of alcohol consumers. The policy increases per capita tax impact by less than A$5.00 per week for light/moderate consumers (50th-80th quantile) and decreases their daily per capita alcohol consumption by less than 0.02 standard drinks. Wealth effects attributable to an MUP policy are likely to be negligible. Substitution effects of the policy dominate the wealth effects in generating key health related outcomes such as reductions in alcohol consumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225538</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31805079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Alcohol Drinking - economics ; Alcohol Drinking - psychology ; Alcohol use ; Alcoholic beverages ; Alcoholic Beverages - economics ; Alcoholic Beverages - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Alcohols ; Australia ; Beverages ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Commerce - economics ; Commerce - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Consumer Behavior - economics ; Consumer Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Consumers ; Demographics ; Economic models ; Elasticity ; Female ; Households ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; People and Places ; Pricing policies ; Purchasing ; Quantiles ; Regression analysis ; Social Sciences ; Substitutes ; Taxation ; Taxes ; Taxes - economics ; Taxes - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2019-12, Vol.14 (12), p.e0225538-e0225538</ispartof><rights>2019 Sharma, Vandenberg. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Sharma, Vandenberg 2019 Sharma, Vandenberg</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-6992ab8db22e31ce0703837084a2f3dde3eb9d585c7e07d724227d7dbccd64a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-6992ab8db22e31ce0703837084a2f3dde3eb9d585c7e07d724227d7dbccd64a43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7570-852X ; 0000-0003-3325-6152</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2322136899/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2322136899?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31805079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>McCollister, Kathryn E.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Anurag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandenberg, Brian</creatorcontrib><title>Heterogenous wealth effects of minimum unit price on purchase of alcohol: Evidence using scanner data</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>One of the key arguments given to oppose the "sin taxes" is that they are regressive in nature and place disproportionately higher cost on the poor thereby reducing their net wealth. The response to a reduction in net wealth attributed to tax can potentially have significant effects through an increase in alcohol purchase by heavy drinkers reinforcing or even offsetting the direct price or substitution effect of these taxes in reducing alcohol consumption. Comparatively little is known empirically about the net wealth effect associated with changes in alcohol tax policy, and this study aims to help fill this gap in the literature. In this study we aim to estimate how the wealth effects of introducing a minimum unit price (MUP) of A$2.00 per standard drink vary over the distribution (quantiles) of alcohol consumers. The data used in this study is a longitudinal panel of 1,395 households' daily alcohol purchases (scanner data) recorded over a full year. Our analysis involves (i) quantile regression to estimate income elasticity over the distribution of consumption, and (ii) using these elasticities to estimate the potential wealth effects of a hypothetical change in alcohol prices from introducing an MUP policy. We control for consumer demographic characteristics, alcohol product prices and prices of close substitutes, and quarterly seasonal effects. We find that the estimated wealth effect from increasing the price of alcohol under a MUP policy is not significant at any point over the distribution of alcohol consumers. The policy increases per capita tax impact by less than A$5.00 per week for light/moderate consumers (50th-80th quantile) and decreases their daily per capita alcohol consumption by less than 0.02 standard drinks. Wealth effects attributable to an MUP policy are likely to be negligible. Substitution effects of the policy dominate the wealth effects in generating key health related outcomes such as reductions in alcohol consumption.</description><subject>Alcohol Drinking - economics</subject><subject>Alcohol Drinking - psychology</subject><subject>Alcohol use</subject><subject>Alcoholic beverages</subject><subject>Alcoholic Beverages - economics</subject><subject>Alcoholic Beverages - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Alcohols</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Beverages</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Commerce - economics</subject><subject>Commerce - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior - economics</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Quantiles</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Substitutes</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>Taxes - economics</subject><subject>Taxes - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsceGyizNObIdDJVQVWqkSFzhbjj3Z9cqxFzsp4u3xdtOqRZzG8nzzz4z9V9Xbmq5rJupPuzinoP16HwOuKUDbMvmsOq07BisOlD1_dD6pXuW8o7QgnL-sTlgtaUtFd1rhFU6Y4gZDnDP5jdpPW4LDgGbKJA5kdMGN80jm4CayT84giYHs52S2OuOB0N7EbfSfyeWtsxgKMGcXNiQbHQImYvWkX1cvBu0zvlniWfXz6-WPi6vVzfdv1xdfblamBT6teNeB7qXtAZDVBqmgTDJBZaNhYNYiw76zrWyNKDkroAEowfbGWN7ohp1V74-6ex-zWl4oK2AANeOy6wpxfSRs1DtVFhp1-qOiduruIqaN0mlyxqOShvVWDD1nrGsGBrI5tGmllADQcFm0zpducz-iNRimpP0T0aeZ4LZqE29VmaSRvC0CHxeBFH_NmCc1umzQex2wfMfd3AIE60RBP_yD_n-75kiZFHNOODwMU1N1cM19lTq4Ri2uKWXvHi_yUHRvE_YXRvHBCQ</recordid><startdate>20191205</startdate><enddate>20191205</enddate><creator>Sharma, Anurag</creator><creator>Vandenberg, Brian</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7570-852X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3325-6152</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191205</creationdate><title>Heterogenous wealth effects of minimum unit price on purchase of alcohol: Evidence using scanner data</title><author>Sharma, Anurag ; Vandenberg, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-6992ab8db22e31ce0703837084a2f3dde3eb9d585c7e07d724227d7dbccd64a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alcohol Drinking - economics</topic><topic>Alcohol Drinking - psychology</topic><topic>Alcohol use</topic><topic>Alcoholic beverages</topic><topic>Alcoholic Beverages - economics</topic><topic>Alcoholic Beverages - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Alcohols</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Beverages</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Commerce - economics</topic><topic>Commerce - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior - economics</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Quantiles</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Substitutes</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>Taxes - economics</topic><topic>Taxes - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Anurag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandenberg, Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Anurag</au><au>Vandenberg, Brian</au><au>McCollister, Kathryn E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heterogenous wealth effects of minimum unit price on purchase of alcohol: Evidence using scanner data</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2019-12-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0225538</spage><epage>e0225538</epage><pages>e0225538-e0225538</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>One of the key arguments given to oppose the "sin taxes" is that they are regressive in nature and place disproportionately higher cost on the poor thereby reducing their net wealth. The response to a reduction in net wealth attributed to tax can potentially have significant effects through an increase in alcohol purchase by heavy drinkers reinforcing or even offsetting the direct price or substitution effect of these taxes in reducing alcohol consumption. Comparatively little is known empirically about the net wealth effect associated with changes in alcohol tax policy, and this study aims to help fill this gap in the literature. In this study we aim to estimate how the wealth effects of introducing a minimum unit price (MUP) of A$2.00 per standard drink vary over the distribution (quantiles) of alcohol consumers. The data used in this study is a longitudinal panel of 1,395 households' daily alcohol purchases (scanner data) recorded over a full year. Our analysis involves (i) quantile regression to estimate income elasticity over the distribution of consumption, and (ii) using these elasticities to estimate the potential wealth effects of a hypothetical change in alcohol prices from introducing an MUP policy. We control for consumer demographic characteristics, alcohol product prices and prices of close substitutes, and quarterly seasonal effects. We find that the estimated wealth effect from increasing the price of alcohol under a MUP policy is not significant at any point over the distribution of alcohol consumers. The policy increases per capita tax impact by less than A$5.00 per week for light/moderate consumers (50th-80th quantile) and decreases their daily per capita alcohol consumption by less than 0.02 standard drinks. Wealth effects attributable to an MUP policy are likely to be negligible. Substitution effects of the policy dominate the wealth effects in generating key health related outcomes such as reductions in alcohol consumption.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>31805079</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0225538</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7570-852X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3325-6152</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2019-12, Vol.14 (12), p.e0225538-e0225538
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2322136899
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Alcohol Drinking - economics
Alcohol Drinking - psychology
Alcohol use
Alcoholic beverages
Alcoholic Beverages - economics
Alcoholic Beverages - statistics & numerical data
Alcohols
Australia
Beverages
Biology and Life Sciences
Commerce - economics
Commerce - statistics & numerical data
Consumer Behavior - economics
Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data
Consumers
Demographics
Economic models
Elasticity
Female
Households
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Medicine and Health Sciences
Middle Aged
People and Places
Pricing policies
Purchasing
Quantiles
Regression analysis
Social Sciences
Substitutes
Taxation
Taxes
Taxes - economics
Taxes - statistics & numerical data
title Heterogenous wealth effects of minimum unit price on purchase of alcohol: Evidence using scanner data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T16%3A54%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heterogenous%20wealth%20effects%20of%20minimum%20unit%20price%20on%20purchase%20of%20alcohol:%20Evidence%20using%20scanner%20data&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Sharma,%20Anurag&rft.date=2019-12-05&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0225538&rft.epage=e0225538&rft.pages=e0225538-e0225538&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0225538&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2322727397%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-6992ab8db22e31ce0703837084a2f3dde3eb9d585c7e07d724227d7dbccd64a43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322136899&rft_id=info:pmid/31805079&rfr_iscdi=true