Loading…
Deficits in pain medication in older adults with chronic pain receiving home care: A cross-sectional study in Germany
To analyze the pattern and appropriateness of pain medications in older adults receiving home care. We performed a prospective cross-sectional study in patients ≥65 years old having chronic pain and receiving home care in Berlin, Germany. Data on prescribed pain medications were collected using self...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2020-02, Vol.15 (2), p.e0229229 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-61f91d7b96977a67a8b4ab27a2b1d362f78a675815bbabcbf7f416bc3f95012d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-61f91d7b96977a67a8b4ab27a2b1d362f78a675815bbabcbf7f416bc3f95012d3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e0229229 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Schneider, Juliana Algharably, Engi Budnick, Andrea Wenzel, Arlett Dräger, Dagmar Kreutz, Reinhold |
description | To analyze the pattern and appropriateness of pain medications in older adults receiving home care.
We performed a prospective cross-sectional study in patients ≥65 years old having chronic pain and receiving home care in Berlin, Germany. Data on prescribed pain medications were collected using self-reported information, nursing documents, and medication plans during interviews at home. Pain intensity was determined with the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Pain Assessment In Advanced dementia (PAINAD) scale. The Pain Medication Appropriateness Scale score (SPMAS) was applied to evaluate inappropriateness (i.e. a score ≤67) of pain medication.
Overall 322 patients with a mean age of 82.1 ± 7.4 years (71.4% females) were evaluated. The average pain intensity scores during the last 24 hours were 5.3 ± 2.1 and 2.3 ± 2.3 on NRS and PAINAD scale (range 0-10, respectively). Sixty (18.6%) patients did not receive any pain medication. Among the treated patients, dipyrone was the most frequently prescribed analgesic (71.4%), while 50.8% and 19.1% received systemic treatment with opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, respectively. The observed median SPMAS was 47.6 (range 0-100) with 58 (18.0%) of patients achieving appropriate values. Half of the patients were treated with scheduled, while 29.9% were only treated with on-demand medications. Cognitive status had no effect on appropriateness of pain treatment.
We observed substantial deficits in dosing patterns and appropriateness of pain medication in older adults with pain receiving home care. This applied to both patients with and without severe cognitive impairment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0229229 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2360073027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A614629599</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b724bf28ecfe4ac092350e77d9fc9b26</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A614629599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-61f91d7b96977a67a8b4ab27a2b1d362f78a675815bbabcbf7f416bc3f95012d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkluL1DAcxYso7kW_gWhBEHyYMZc2aXwQhlXXgYUFb68hSZNphrYZk3Td-famO91lCgrS0JST3_80HE6WvYBgCTGF77Zu8L1olzvX6yVAiKX1KDuFDKMFQQA_Pvo-yc5C2AJQ4oqQp9kJRqAqkn6aDR-1scrGkNs-34n06nRtlYjW9aPk2lr7XNRDm5DfNja5arzrrTrAXittb2y_yRvX6VwJr9_nq1x5F8IiaDXaiDYPcaj3o92l9p3o98-yJ0a0QT-f9vPsx-dP3y--LK6uL9cXq6uFIgzFBYGGwZpKRhilglBRyUJIRAWSsMYEGVoltaxgKaWQShpqCkikwoaVAKIan2evDr671gU-JRY4wgQAigGiiVgfiNqJLd952wm_505Yfic4v-HCR6tazSVFhTSo0sroQijAEC6BprRmRjGJSPL6MP1tkClFpfvoRTsznZ_0tuEbd8MpwEUFRoPXk4F3vwYd4j-uPFEbkW5le-OSmepsUHxFYEEQKxlL1PIvVHpq3VmVOmNs0mcDb2cDiYn6Nm7EEAJff_v6_-z1zzn75ohttGhjE1w7jNUIc7A4gHft8do8JAcBHyt_nwYfK8-nyqexl8epPwzddxz_AYK4_SY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2360073027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deficits in pain medication in older adults with chronic pain receiving home care: A cross-sectional study in Germany</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Schneider, Juliana ; Algharably, Engi ; Budnick, Andrea ; Wenzel, Arlett ; Dräger, Dagmar ; Kreutz, Reinhold</creator><contributor>Li, Yan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Juliana ; Algharably, Engi ; Budnick, Andrea ; Wenzel, Arlett ; Dräger, Dagmar ; Kreutz, Reinhold ; Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze the pattern and appropriateness of pain medications in older adults receiving home care.
We performed a prospective cross-sectional study in patients ≥65 years old having chronic pain and receiving home care in Berlin, Germany. Data on prescribed pain medications were collected using self-reported information, nursing documents, and medication plans during interviews at home. Pain intensity was determined with the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Pain Assessment In Advanced dementia (PAINAD) scale. The Pain Medication Appropriateness Scale score (SPMAS) was applied to evaluate inappropriateness (i.e. a score ≤67) of pain medication.
Overall 322 patients with a mean age of 82.1 ± 7.4 years (71.4% females) were evaluated. The average pain intensity scores during the last 24 hours were 5.3 ± 2.1 and 2.3 ± 2.3 on NRS and PAINAD scale (range 0-10, respectively). Sixty (18.6%) patients did not receive any pain medication. Among the treated patients, dipyrone was the most frequently prescribed analgesic (71.4%), while 50.8% and 19.1% received systemic treatment with opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, respectively. The observed median SPMAS was 47.6 (range 0-100) with 58 (18.0%) of patients achieving appropriate values. Half of the patients were treated with scheduled, while 29.9% were only treated with on-demand medications. Cognitive status had no effect on appropriateness of pain treatment.
We observed substantial deficits in dosing patterns and appropriateness of pain medication in older adults with pain receiving home care. This applied to both patients with and without severe cognitive impairment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229229</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32084203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adults ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ambulatory care ; Analgesics ; Analysis ; Anti-inflammatory agents ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Chronic pain ; Chronic Pain - drug therapy ; Cognition ; Cognitive ability ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dementia ; Dementia disorders ; Demographics ; Dipyrone ; Drugs ; Elderly ; Evaluation ; Female ; Females ; Germany ; Gerontology ; Home care ; Home Care Services - statistics & numerical data ; Home health care ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Male ; Measures ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Narcotics ; Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Older people ; Opiates ; Opioids ; Pain ; Pain management ; Patients ; Pattern analysis ; People and Places ; Pharmacology ; Polypharmacy ; Population ; Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Rehabilitation ; Sociology ; Steroidal anti-inflammatory agents ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-02, Vol.15 (2), p.e0229229</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Schneider et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Schneider et al 2020 Schneider et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-61f91d7b96977a67a8b4ab27a2b1d362f78a675815bbabcbf7f416bc3f95012d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-61f91d7b96977a67a8b4ab27a2b1d362f78a675815bbabcbf7f416bc3f95012d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6015-8251</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2360073027/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2360073027?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27344,27924,27925,33774,37012,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32084203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Li, Yan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Juliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Algharably, Engi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budnick, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Arlett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dräger, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreutz, Reinhold</creatorcontrib><title>Deficits in pain medication in older adults with chronic pain receiving home care: A cross-sectional study in Germany</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To analyze the pattern and appropriateness of pain medications in older adults receiving home care.
We performed a prospective cross-sectional study in patients ≥65 years old having chronic pain and receiving home care in Berlin, Germany. Data on prescribed pain medications were collected using self-reported information, nursing documents, and medication plans during interviews at home. Pain intensity was determined with the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Pain Assessment In Advanced dementia (PAINAD) scale. The Pain Medication Appropriateness Scale score (SPMAS) was applied to evaluate inappropriateness (i.e. a score ≤67) of pain medication.
Overall 322 patients with a mean age of 82.1 ± 7.4 years (71.4% females) were evaluated. The average pain intensity scores during the last 24 hours were 5.3 ± 2.1 and 2.3 ± 2.3 on NRS and PAINAD scale (range 0-10, respectively). Sixty (18.6%) patients did not receive any pain medication. Among the treated patients, dipyrone was the most frequently prescribed analgesic (71.4%), while 50.8% and 19.1% received systemic treatment with opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, respectively. The observed median SPMAS was 47.6 (range 0-100) with 58 (18.0%) of patients achieving appropriate values. Half of the patients were treated with scheduled, while 29.9% were only treated with on-demand medications. Cognitive status had no effect on appropriateness of pain treatment.
We observed substantial deficits in dosing patterns and appropriateness of pain medication in older adults with pain receiving home care. This applied to both patients with and without severe cognitive impairment.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ambulatory care</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anti-inflammatory agents</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia disorders</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Dipyrone</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Gerontology</subject><subject>Home care</subject><subject>Home Care Services - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Home health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Opiates</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pattern analysis</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Polypharmacy</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Steroidal anti-inflammatory agents</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkluL1DAcxYso7kW_gWhBEHyYMZc2aXwQhlXXgYUFb68hSZNphrYZk3Td-famO91lCgrS0JST3_80HE6WvYBgCTGF77Zu8L1olzvX6yVAiKX1KDuFDKMFQQA_Pvo-yc5C2AJQ4oqQp9kJRqAqkn6aDR-1scrGkNs-34n06nRtlYjW9aPk2lr7XNRDm5DfNja5arzrrTrAXittb2y_yRvX6VwJr9_nq1x5F8IiaDXaiDYPcaj3o92l9p3o98-yJ0a0QT-f9vPsx-dP3y--LK6uL9cXq6uFIgzFBYGGwZpKRhilglBRyUJIRAWSsMYEGVoltaxgKaWQShpqCkikwoaVAKIan2evDr671gU-JRY4wgQAigGiiVgfiNqJLd952wm_505Yfic4v-HCR6tazSVFhTSo0sroQijAEC6BprRmRjGJSPL6MP1tkClFpfvoRTsznZ_0tuEbd8MpwEUFRoPXk4F3vwYd4j-uPFEbkW5le-OSmepsUHxFYEEQKxlL1PIvVHpq3VmVOmNs0mcDb2cDiYn6Nm7EEAJff_v6_-z1zzn75ohttGhjE1w7jNUIc7A4gHft8do8JAcBHyt_nwYfK8-nyqexl8epPwzddxz_AYK4_SY</recordid><startdate>20200221</startdate><enddate>20200221</enddate><creator>Schneider, Juliana</creator><creator>Algharably, Engi</creator><creator>Budnick, Andrea</creator><creator>Wenzel, Arlett</creator><creator>Dräger, Dagmar</creator><creator>Kreutz, Reinhold</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6015-8251</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200221</creationdate><title>Deficits in pain medication in older adults with chronic pain receiving home care: A cross-sectional study in Germany</title><author>Schneider, Juliana ; Algharably, Engi ; Budnick, Andrea ; Wenzel, Arlett ; Dräger, Dagmar ; Kreutz, Reinhold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-61f91d7b96977a67a8b4ab27a2b1d362f78a675815bbabcbf7f416bc3f95012d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ambulatory care</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anti-inflammatory agents</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia disorders</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Dipyrone</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Gerontology</topic><topic>Home care</topic><topic>Home Care Services - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Home health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Opiates</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pattern analysis</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Polypharmacy</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Steroidal anti-inflammatory agents</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Juliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Algharably, Engi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budnick, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Arlett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dräger, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreutz, Reinhold</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, Juliana</au><au>Algharably, Engi</au><au>Budnick, Andrea</au><au>Wenzel, Arlett</au><au>Dräger, Dagmar</au><au>Kreutz, Reinhold</au><au>Li, Yan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deficits in pain medication in older adults with chronic pain receiving home care: A cross-sectional study in Germany</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-02-21</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0229229</spage><pages>e0229229-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To analyze the pattern and appropriateness of pain medications in older adults receiving home care.
We performed a prospective cross-sectional study in patients ≥65 years old having chronic pain and receiving home care in Berlin, Germany. Data on prescribed pain medications were collected using self-reported information, nursing documents, and medication plans during interviews at home. Pain intensity was determined with the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Pain Assessment In Advanced dementia (PAINAD) scale. The Pain Medication Appropriateness Scale score (SPMAS) was applied to evaluate inappropriateness (i.e. a score ≤67) of pain medication.
Overall 322 patients with a mean age of 82.1 ± 7.4 years (71.4% females) were evaluated. The average pain intensity scores during the last 24 hours were 5.3 ± 2.1 and 2.3 ± 2.3 on NRS and PAINAD scale (range 0-10, respectively). Sixty (18.6%) patients did not receive any pain medication. Among the treated patients, dipyrone was the most frequently prescribed analgesic (71.4%), while 50.8% and 19.1% received systemic treatment with opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, respectively. The observed median SPMAS was 47.6 (range 0-100) with 58 (18.0%) of patients achieving appropriate values. Half of the patients were treated with scheduled, while 29.9% were only treated with on-demand medications. Cognitive status had no effect on appropriateness of pain treatment.
We observed substantial deficits in dosing patterns and appropriateness of pain medication in older adults with pain receiving home care. This applied to both patients with and without severe cognitive impairment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32084203</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0229229</doi><tpages>e0229229</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6015-8251</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2020-02, Vol.15 (2), p.e0229229 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2360073027 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adults Aged, 80 and over Ambulatory care Analgesics Analysis Anti-inflammatory agents Biology and Life Sciences Chronic pain Chronic Pain - drug therapy Cognition Cognitive ability Cross-Sectional Studies Dementia Dementia disorders Demographics Dipyrone Drugs Elderly Evaluation Female Females Germany Gerontology Home care Home Care Services - statistics & numerical data Home health care Humans Inflammation Male Measures Medical research Medicine and Health Sciences Narcotics Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Nurses Nursing Nursing care Older people Opiates Opioids Pain Pain management Patients Pattern analysis People and Places Pharmacology Polypharmacy Population Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Rehabilitation Sociology Steroidal anti-inflammatory agents Toxicology |
title | Deficits in pain medication in older adults with chronic pain receiving home care: A cross-sectional study in Germany |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T19%3A15%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deficits%20in%20pain%20medication%20in%20older%20adults%20with%20chronic%20pain%20receiving%20home%20care:%20A%20cross-sectional%20study%20in%20Germany&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Schneider,%20Juliana&rft.date=2020-02-21&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0229229&rft.pages=e0229229-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0229229&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA614629599%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-61f91d7b96977a67a8b4ab27a2b1d362f78a675815bbabcbf7f416bc3f95012d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2360073027&rft_id=info:pmid/32084203&rft_galeid=A614629599&rfr_iscdi=true |