Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time

When questioning the veracity of an utterance, we perceive certain non-linguistic behaviours to indicate that a speaker is being deceptive. Recent work has highlighted that listeners' associations between speech disfluency and dishonesty are detectable at the earliest stages of reference compre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0229486-e0229486
Main Authors: King, Josiah P J, Loy, Jia E, Rohde, Hannah, Corley, Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal experimentation
Behavior
Biology and Life Sciences
Cues
Deception
Dishonesty
Engineering and Technology
Experiments
Information processing
Language
Linguistics
Medicine and Health Sciences
Physical Sciences
Research and Analysis Methods
Semantics
Social Sciences
Time
Visual stimuli
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:When questioning the veracity of an utterance, we perceive certain non-linguistic behaviours to indicate that a speaker is being deceptive. Recent work has highlighted that listeners' associations between speech disfluency and dishonesty are detectable at the earliest stages of reference comprehension, suggesting that the manner of spoken delivery influences pragmatic judgements concurrently with the processing of lexical information. Here, we investigate the integration of a speaker's gestures into judgements of deception, and ask if and when associations between nonverbal cues and deception emerge. Participants saw and heard a video of a potentially dishonest speaker describe treasure hidden behind an object, while also viewing images of both the named object and a distractor object. Their task was to click on the object behind which they believed the treasure to actually be hidden. Eye and mouse movements were recorded. Experiment 1 investigated listeners' associations between visual cues and deception, using a variety of static and dynamic cues. Experiment 2 focused on adaptor gestures. We show that a speaker's nonverbal behaviour can have a rapid and direct influence on listeners' pragmatic judgements, supporting the idea that communication is fundamentally multimodal.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0229486