Level of depression, anxiety and stress in patients with intrauterine adhesions in Hunan Province, China: A cross-sectional study

• Published in: PloS one 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0229832-e0229832
• Main Authors: Wang, Ting, Zhou, Yanhui, Fu, Jingxia, Chen, Mingzhu, Luo, Yang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adhesions; Anxiety; Avoidance; Biology and Life Sciences; Care and treatment; Cross-sectional studies; Emotions; Fertility; Gynecology; Health; Infertility; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mental depression; Mental health; Nursing schools; Obstetrics; Patients; Quantitative psychology; Questionnaires; Risk analysis; Risk factors; Social Sciences; Sociodemographics; Statistical tests; Stress; Stress (Psychology); Variance analysis; Women; Women's health
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229832

The incidence of intrauterine adhesions has been increasing in recent years, seriously affecting women's health. This study aimed to investigate the psychological status and identify risk factors associated with high psychological distress in patients with intrauterine adhesions. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Hunan Province, China. A total of 258 patients who presented with intrauterine adhesions between February and May 2018 were included. Data were collected by a questionnaire packet that included the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, the Medical Coping Mode Questionnaire, and demographic and clinical information. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlations and multiple linear stepwise regression were employed in this study. Among 258 participants, the detection rates of mild depression and moderate to extremely severe depression were 10.1% and 10.5%, respectively; the detection rates of mild anxiety and moderate to extremely severe anxiety were 11.2% and 20.2%, respectively; the detection rates of mild stress and moderate to extremely severe stress were 9.3% and 10.2%, respectively. Avoidance and resignation coping were positively correlated with the overall scores of general distress which represents the total scores of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (r = 0.171, 0.475, P < 0.01). Multiple linear stepwise regression results showed that husband-wife relationships and avoidance and resignation coping strategies were the main factors predicting general distress levels. Patients with intrauterine adhesions have psychological distress in a certain extent. Target interventions should be taken to improve the mental health level of patients.