Three-dimensional curvature mismatch of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius is increased in borderline dysplastic hips

• Published in: PloS one 2020-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e0231001-e0231001
• Main Authors: Irie, Tohru, Orías, Alejandro A Espinoza, Irie, Tomoyo Y, Nho, Shane J, Takahashi, Daisuke, Iwasaki, Norimasa, Inoue, Nozomu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acetabulum; Biology and Life Sciences; Biomedical materials; Bone dysplasia; Bone surgery; Cartilage; CAT scans; Computed tomography; Dysplasia; Femur; Future predictions; Hip; Hips; Image reconstruction; Joints (anatomy); Medical imaging; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Natural history; Orthopedics; Osteoarthritis; Pathogenesis; Pelvis; Physical Sciences; Radius; Radius of curvature; Research and Analysis Methods; Surgical implants; Three dimensional models
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231001

Whether borderline hip dysplasia is pathologic remains unclear. In order to evaluate the three-dimensional joint congruity, this study sought to answer the question: are borderline dysplastic hip curvature mismatch and eccentricity between the acetabulum and the femoral head different from dysplastic or control hips three-dimensionally? The 113 hips, categorized as: dysplastic (LCEA ≤ 20°), 47 hips; borderline (20° ≤ LCEA < 25°), 32 hips; and control (25° ≤ LCEA < 35°), 34 hips; were evaluated. Three-dimensional (3D) femoral and coxal bone models were reconstructed from CT images. Using a custom-written Visual C++ routine, the femoral head and acetabular radii of curvature, and the femoral head and the acetabular curvature center were calculated. Then the ratio of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius (3D curvature mismatch ratio), and the distance between the acetabular curvature center and the femoral head center (3D center discrepancy distance) were calculated. These indices were compared statistically among the three groups using Tukey's post hoc test. The mean 3D curvature mismatch ratio in the borderline (1.13 ± 0.05) was smaller than in the dysplasia (1.23 ± 0.08, p < 0.001), and larger than in the control (1.07 ± 0.02, p < 0.001). The mean 3D center discrepancy distance in the borderline (3.2 ± 1.4 mm) was smaller than in the dysplasia (4.8 ± 2.3, p < 0.001) and larger than in the control (1.6 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). These results demonstrated that three-dimensional congruity of the borderline dysplastic hip is impaired, but its incongruity is not as severe as in dysplastic hips. The 3D curvature mismatch ratio and the 3D center discrepancy distance can be valuable signs of joint congruity in patients with borderline dysplasia. However, future studies are necessary to clarify any associations between curvature mismatch and pathogenesis of osteoarthritis in borderline dysplasia.