Validation of the Polar OH1 and M600 optical heart rate sensors during front crawl swim training

• Published in: PloS one 2020-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e0231522-e0231522
• Main Authors: Olstad, Bjørn Harald, Zinner, Christoph
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agreements; Biology and Life Sciences; Data collection; Engineering and Technology; Heart rate; Medicine and Health Sciences; Participation; Research and Analysis Methods; Sensors; Social Sciences; Swimming; Training; Validity; Wrist
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231522

The Polar OH1 is an optical heart rate (HR) sensor which can be used on different parts of the body. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the validity of the OH1 as well as a wrist worn heart rate device (Polar M600) during swimming. Twenty-six well-trained competitive swimmers performed a regular training session including different swimming intensities. During the training the swimmers wore a H10 HR sensor with Polar Pro strap (H10) underneath the swim suit, a Polar OH1 optical HR sensor (OH1) underneath the swimming cap at the temple, and a sports watch with optical HR sensor, Polar M600 smart watch (M600) on the wrist. No difference in HRmax, HRmean and HRmin between H10 and OH1 were evident. The HRmax and HRmean obtained by the M600 was significantly lower than the obtained by H10 and OH1 (p < 0.05). The ICC showed mostly excellent agreements between H10 and OH1 and poor to good agreements between H10 and M600. Bland-Altmann plot for M600 vs. H10 indicates upper and lower limits of agreement of -53.0 to 33.9 beats per minute. For OH1 vs. H10 the upper and lower limits of agreement were -26.9 to 24.7 beats per minute. The Polar OH1 optical HR sensor is a valid tool to monitor HR of different intensities during swimming whereas the Polar M600 smart watch as a wrist worn device is less accurate.