The benefits of higher LMR for early threatened abortion: A retrospective cohort study

To investigate the relation of inflammation-related parameters and pregnancy outcome in women with the early threatened abortion. 630 women with early threatened abortion were divided into two groups based on the pregnancy outcome. All of them had the blood routine examination before treating. The d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2020-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e0231642-e0231642
Main Authors: Feng, Qiu-Ting, Chen, Chi, Yu, Qing-Ying, Chen, Si-Yun, Huang, Xian, Zhong, Yan-Lan, Luo, Song-Ping, Gao, Jie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abortion
Biology and Life Sciences
Blood
Chi-square test
Chinese medicine
Cohort analysis
Hospitals
Inflammation
Lymphocytes
Medical prognosis
Medicine and Health Sciences
Miscarriage
Pregnancy
Regression analysis
Regression models
Statistical analysis
Statistical tests
Studies
Variables
Womens health
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-bc70dc76362d7d5edaae8de195496bf4ab62e11cbe8c01f6f0129ab91ce829dd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-bc70dc76362d7d5edaae8de195496bf4ab62e11cbe8c01f6f0129ab91ce829dd3
container_end_page e0231642
container_issue 4
container_start_page e0231642
container_title PloS one
container_volume 15
creator Feng, Qiu-Ting
Chen, Chi
Yu, Qing-Ying
Chen, Si-Yun
Huang, Xian
Zhong, Yan-Lan
Luo, Song-Ping
Gao, Jie
description To investigate the relation of inflammation-related parameters and pregnancy outcome in women with the early threatened abortion. 630 women with early threatened abortion were divided into two groups based on the pregnancy outcome. All of them had the blood routine examination before treating. The differences between two groups were analyzed by the Chi-squared test, Student T test, Mann-Whitney U test, Binary Logistic Regression, Marginal Structural Model and Threshold effect analysis. We found that there is no significant difference in the pregnancy outcome for NLR (OR:0.92, CI95%:0.72, 1.17) and PLR (OR:1.00, CI%:0.99, 1.01). However, a difference had a statistical significance in the pregnancy outcome when LMR less than 2.19 (OR:0.39, CI95%:0.19,0.82). This study suggested that higher LMR was related to the lower risk of miscarriage in the women with early threatened abortion in a way.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0231642
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2392432594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e9c26de090c04b058eb9f05c3b8755f3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2392432594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-bc70dc76362d7d5edaae8de195496bf4ab62e11cbe8c01f6f0129ab91ce829dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktr3DAUhU1padK0_6C0gm66makelmx1UQihj8CEQkmyFXpcjT14rKkkB-bfV8k4ISlZSeh-9-ge6VTVe4KXhDXkyyZMcdTDchdGWGLKiKjpi-qYSEYXgmL28tH-qHqT0gZjzlohXldHrOBYtvi4ur7sABkYwfc5oeBR1687iGh18Qf5EBHoOOxR7iLoXCiHtAkx92H8ik5RhBxD2oHN_Q0gG7pSQilPbv-2euX1kODdvJ5UVz--X579Wqx-_zw_O10tLKciL4xtsLONYIK6xnFwWkPrgEheS2F8rY2gQIg10FpMvPCYUKmNJBZaKp1jJ9XHg-5uCEnNT5IUZZLWjHJZF-L8QLigN2oX-62OexV0r-4OQlwrXQzZARRIS4UDLLHFtcG8BSM95paZtuHcs6L1bb5tMltwFsYc9fBE9Gll7Du1DjeqIQ2mnBaBz7NADH8nSFlt-2RhGPQIYbqbm-GaM9oW9NN_6PPu6gNly0ekCP5hGILVbUzuu9RtTNQck9L24bGRh6b7XLB_VkC8VA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2392432594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The benefits of higher LMR for early threatened abortion: A retrospective cohort study</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Feng, Qiu-Ting ; Chen, Chi ; Yu, Qing-Ying ; Chen, Si-Yun ; Huang, Xian ; Zhong, Yan-Lan ; Luo, Song-Ping ; Gao, Jie</creator><creatorcontrib>Feng, Qiu-Ting ; Chen, Chi ; Yu, Qing-Ying ; Chen, Si-Yun ; Huang, Xian ; Zhong, Yan-Lan ; Luo, Song-Ping ; Gao, Jie</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the relation of inflammation-related parameters and pregnancy outcome in women with the early threatened abortion. 630 women with early threatened abortion were divided into two groups based on the pregnancy outcome. All of them had the blood routine examination before treating. The differences between two groups were analyzed by the Chi-squared test, Student T test, Mann-Whitney U test, Binary Logistic Regression, Marginal Structural Model and Threshold effect analysis. We found that there is no significant difference in the pregnancy outcome for NLR (OR:0.92, CI95%:0.72, 1.17) and PLR (OR:1.00, CI%:0.99, 1.01). However, a difference had a statistical significance in the pregnancy outcome when LMR less than 2.19 (OR:0.39, CI95%:0.19,0.82). This study suggested that higher LMR was related to the lower risk of miscarriage in the women with early threatened abortion in a way.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231642</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32310980</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Blood ; Chi-square test ; Chinese medicine ; Cohort analysis ; Hospitals ; Inflammation ; Lymphocytes ; Medical prognosis ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Miscarriage ; Pregnancy ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical tests ; Studies ; Variables ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e0231642-e0231642</ispartof><rights>2020 Feng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Feng et al 2020 Feng et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-bc70dc76362d7d5edaae8de195496bf4ab62e11cbe8c01f6f0129ab91ce829dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-bc70dc76362d7d5edaae8de195496bf4ab62e11cbe8c01f6f0129ab91ce829dd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5183-0985 ; 0000-0001-6934-6163</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2392432594/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2392432594?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25730,27900,27901,36988,36989,44565,53765,53767,75095</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310980$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feng, Qiu-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Qing-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Si-Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Yan-Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Song-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Jie</creatorcontrib><title>The benefits of higher LMR for early threatened abortion: A retrospective cohort study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To investigate the relation of inflammation-related parameters and pregnancy outcome in women with the early threatened abortion. 630 women with early threatened abortion were divided into two groups based on the pregnancy outcome. All of them had the blood routine examination before treating. The differences between two groups were analyzed by the Chi-squared test, Student T test, Mann-Whitney U test, Binary Logistic Regression, Marginal Structural Model and Threshold effect analysis. We found that there is no significant difference in the pregnancy outcome for NLR (OR:0.92, CI95%:0.72, 1.17) and PLR (OR:1.00, CI%:0.99, 1.01). However, a difference had a statistical significance in the pregnancy outcome when LMR less than 2.19 (OR:0.39, CI95%:0.19,0.82). This study suggested that higher LMR was related to the lower risk of miscarriage in the women with early threatened abortion in a way.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Chinese medicine</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Lymphocytes</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Miscarriage</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktr3DAUhU1padK0_6C0gm66makelmx1UQihj8CEQkmyFXpcjT14rKkkB-bfV8k4ISlZSeh-9-ge6VTVe4KXhDXkyyZMcdTDchdGWGLKiKjpi-qYSEYXgmL28tH-qHqT0gZjzlohXldHrOBYtvi4ur7sABkYwfc5oeBR1687iGh18Qf5EBHoOOxR7iLoXCiHtAkx92H8ik5RhBxD2oHN_Q0gG7pSQilPbv-2euX1kODdvJ5UVz--X579Wqx-_zw_O10tLKciL4xtsLONYIK6xnFwWkPrgEheS2F8rY2gQIg10FpMvPCYUKmNJBZaKp1jJ9XHg-5uCEnNT5IUZZLWjHJZF-L8QLigN2oX-62OexV0r-4OQlwrXQzZARRIS4UDLLHFtcG8BSM95paZtuHcs6L1bb5tMltwFsYc9fBE9Gll7Du1DjeqIQ2mnBaBz7NADH8nSFlt-2RhGPQIYbqbm-GaM9oW9NN_6PPu6gNly0ekCP5hGILVbUzuu9RtTNQck9L24bGRh6b7XLB_VkC8VA</recordid><startdate>20200420</startdate><enddate>20200420</enddate><creator>Feng, Qiu-Ting</creator><creator>Chen, Chi</creator><creator>Yu, Qing-Ying</creator><creator>Chen, Si-Yun</creator><creator>Huang, Xian</creator><creator>Zhong, Yan-Lan</creator><creator>Luo, Song-Ping</creator><creator>Gao, Jie</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5183-0985</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6934-6163</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200420</creationdate><title>The benefits of higher LMR for early threatened abortion: A retrospective cohort study</title><author>Feng, Qiu-Ting ; Chen, Chi ; Yu, Qing-Ying ; Chen, Si-Yun ; Huang, Xian ; Zhong, Yan-Lan ; Luo, Song-Ping ; Gao, Jie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-bc70dc76362d7d5edaae8de195496bf4ab62e11cbe8c01f6f0129ab91ce829dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Chinese medicine</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Lymphocytes</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Miscarriage</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feng, Qiu-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Qing-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Si-Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Yan-Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Song-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Jie</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feng, Qiu-Ting</au><au>Chen, Chi</au><au>Yu, Qing-Ying</au><au>Chen, Si-Yun</au><au>Huang, Xian</au><au>Zhong, Yan-Lan</au><au>Luo, Song-Ping</au><au>Gao, Jie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The benefits of higher LMR for early threatened abortion: A retrospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-04-20</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0231642</spage><epage>e0231642</epage><pages>e0231642-e0231642</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To investigate the relation of inflammation-related parameters and pregnancy outcome in women with the early threatened abortion. 630 women with early threatened abortion were divided into two groups based on the pregnancy outcome. All of them had the blood routine examination before treating. The differences between two groups were analyzed by the Chi-squared test, Student T test, Mann-Whitney U test, Binary Logistic Regression, Marginal Structural Model and Threshold effect analysis. We found that there is no significant difference in the pregnancy outcome for NLR (OR:0.92, CI95%:0.72, 1.17) and PLR (OR:1.00, CI%:0.99, 1.01). However, a difference had a statistical significance in the pregnancy outcome when LMR less than 2.19 (OR:0.39, CI95%:0.19,0.82). This study suggested that higher LMR was related to the lower risk of miscarriage in the women with early threatened abortion in a way.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32310980</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0231642</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5183-0985</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6934-6163</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2020-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e0231642-e0231642
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2392432594
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Abortion
Biology and Life Sciences
Blood
Chi-square test
Chinese medicine
Cohort analysis
Hospitals
Inflammation
Lymphocytes
Medical prognosis
Medicine and Health Sciences
Miscarriage
Pregnancy
Regression analysis
Regression models
Statistical analysis
Statistical tests
Studies
Variables
Womens health
title The benefits of higher LMR for early threatened abortion: A retrospective cohort study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T09%3A23%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20benefits%20of%20higher%20LMR%20for%20early%20threatened%20abortion:%20A%20retrospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Feng,%20Qiu-Ting&rft.date=2020-04-20&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0231642&rft.epage=e0231642&rft.pages=e0231642-e0231642&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0231642&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2392432594%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-bc70dc76362d7d5edaae8de195496bf4ab62e11cbe8c01f6f0129ab91ce829dd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2392432594&rft_id=info:pmid/32310980&rfr_iscdi=true