Assessment of measurement properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the low back activity confidence scale (LoBACS) in patients with chronic low back pain

• Published in: PloS one 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0239332-e0239332
• Main Authors: Dias, Josilainne Marcelino, Silva, Mariana Felipe, Dela Bela, Laís Faganello, Pelegrinelli, Alexandre Roberto Marcondes, Olkoski, Mabel Micheline, Guenka, Leandro Caetano, Yamada, Kimiko, Cardoso, Jefferson Rosa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adaptation; Back pain; Biology and Life Sciences; Biomechanics; Chronic pain; Confidence; Correlation analysis; Correlation coefficient; Correlation coefficients; Epidemiology; Evaluation; Factor analysis; Health aspects; Health surveys; Laboratories; Low back pain; Medicine and Health Sciences; Pain; Patients; People and places; Physical Sciences; Physical therapy; Psychological aspects; Questionnaires; Reliability analysis; Research and Analysis Methods; Self efficacy; Social Sciences; Surveys; Translations; Validation studies; Validity; Variance analysis
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239332

The Low Back Activity Confidence Scale (LoBACS) assesses the self-efficacy to perform activities in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). As self-efficacy appears to directly influence the patient's functional capacity and prognosis, it is important to develop a scale that evaluates this attribute to guide treatment strategy and monitor the clinical course of patients. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the Brazilian version of the LoBACS. The scale was applied to 112 male and female patients (age, 18-65 years) with specific and nonspecific CLBP. For evaluating the interobserver reliability, the scale was applied twice on the first evaluation day by two trained evaluators (A and B). Within 48-72 h of the first evaluation, assessor A reapplied the scale to evaluate intraobserver reliability (test-retest), which was analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The first LoBACS applied in the baseline evaluation was also used to assess the construct validity of the scale by factor analysis. For responsiveness, the scale was applied 5 times at 2-week intervals and the change in scores was analyzed by the repeated measures ANOVA. Although factor analysis indicated three subscales, they did not present acceptable values of convergent and divergent validity. Reliability ranged from good to excellent, with ICC values of .90 (95% CI, .84; .93) and .85 (95% CI, .77; .91) for inter- and intraobserver variability for total score. Moreover, the total score was responsive in all comparisons, with no floor or ceiling effects. Thus, only the total score of the Brazilian version of LoBACS proved to be reliable, valid, and responsive.