Loading…

Implicit race attitudes modulate visual information extraction for trustworthiness judgments

Black people are still considered to be one of the most stigmatized groups and have to face multiple prejudices that undermine their well-being. Assumptions and beliefs about other racial groups are quite pervasive and have been shown to impact basic social tasks such as face processing. For example...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0239305-e0239305
Main Authors: Charbonneau, Isabelle, Robinson, Karolann, Blais, Caroline, Fiset, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-826fb78806546e744a16fb7f0d5ae06927d19d50886f712a71b51f12a1701ed53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-826fb78806546e744a16fb7f0d5ae06927d19d50886f712a71b51f12a1701ed53
container_end_page e0239305
container_issue 9
container_start_page e0239305
container_title PloS one
container_volume 15
creator Charbonneau, Isabelle
Robinson, Karolann
Blais, Caroline
Fiset, Daniel
description Black people are still considered to be one of the most stigmatized groups and have to face multiple prejudices that undermine their well-being. Assumptions and beliefs about other racial groups are quite pervasive and have been shown to impact basic social tasks such as face processing. For example, individuals with high racial prejudice conceptualize other-race faces as less trustworthy and more criminal. However, it is unknown if implicit racial bias could modulate even low-level perceptual mechanisms such as spatial frequency (SF) extraction when judging the level of trustworthiness of other-race faces. The present study showed that although similar facial features are used to judge the trustworthiness of White and Black faces, own-race faces are processed in lower SF (i.e. coarse information such as the contour of the face and blurred shapes as opposed to high SF representing fine-grained information such as eyelashes or fine wrinkles). This pattern was modulated by implicit race biases: higher implicit biases are associated with a significantly higher reliance on low SF with White than with Black faces.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0239305
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2445951832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A636415902</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_89dea1cc3da345c58bdb591361bbb337</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A636415902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-826fb78806546e744a16fb7f0d5ae06927d19d50886f712a71b51f12a1701ed53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkkuLFDEUhQtRnHH0H4gWCOKm26RSedRGGAYfDQNudCeEW0mqO02q0uYx6r831V0zzIirXG6-nNyTnKp6idEaE47f730OE7j1wU9mjRrSEUQfVee4I82KNYg8vlefVc9i3CNEiWDsaXVGmo4j3tDz6sdmPDirbKoDKFNDSjZlbWI9ep0dJFPf2JjB1XYafBghWT_V5ncq9LEszTqFHNMvH9LOTibGep_1djRTis-rJwO4aF4s60X1_dPHb1dfVtdfP2-uLq9XilKeVqJhQ8-FQIy2zPC2BTw3BqQpGMS6hmvcaYqEYAPHDXDcUzyUAnOEjabkonp90j04H-XyMFE2bUs7igVpCrE5EdrDXh6CHSH8kR6sPDZ82EoIySpnpOi0AawU0UBaqqjodU87TBju-54QXrQ-LLflfjRaFacB3APRhzuT3cmtv5Gc4hYJUgTeLQLB_8wmJjnaqIxzMBmfj3MzxgTjqKBv_kH_7-7tidpCMbAz4NIuepfnH4rykhHWYtqhGWxPoAo-xmCGu6kxknOqbuXlnCq5pKoce3Xf8d2h2xiRv-W0zBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2445951832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implicit race attitudes modulate visual information extraction for trustworthiness judgments</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Charbonneau, Isabelle ; Robinson, Karolann ; Blais, Caroline ; Fiset, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Charbonneau, Isabelle ; Robinson, Karolann ; Blais, Caroline ; Fiset, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Black people are still considered to be one of the most stigmatized groups and have to face multiple prejudices that undermine their well-being. Assumptions and beliefs about other racial groups are quite pervasive and have been shown to impact basic social tasks such as face processing. For example, individuals with high racial prejudice conceptualize other-race faces as less trustworthy and more criminal. However, it is unknown if implicit racial bias could modulate even low-level perceptual mechanisms such as spatial frequency (SF) extraction when judging the level of trustworthiness of other-race faces. The present study showed that although similar facial features are used to judge the trustworthiness of White and Black faces, own-race faces are processed in lower SF (i.e. coarse information such as the contour of the face and blurred shapes as opposed to high SF representing fine-grained information such as eyelashes or fine wrinkles). This pattern was modulated by implicit race biases: higher implicit biases are associated with a significantly higher reliance on low SF with White than with Black faces.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239305</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32970725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude ; Bias ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Black or African American ; Black people ; Blacks ; Comparative analysis ; Crime ; Face ; Facial Expression ; Female ; Frequency dependence ; Happiness ; Humans ; Information retrieval ; Judgment - ethics ; Judgment - physiology ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Neurosciences ; Pattern recognition ; Prejudice ; Psychological aspects ; Psychological research ; Race ; Racism ; Racism - ethics ; Racism - psychology ; Social aspects ; Social Perception ; Social Sciences ; Stereotyping ; Trust (Psychology) ; Trustworthiness ; Well being ; White People - psychology ; Whites ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0239305-e0239305</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Charbonneau et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Charbonneau et al 2020 Charbonneau et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-826fb78806546e744a16fb7f0d5ae06927d19d50886f712a71b51f12a1701ed53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-826fb78806546e744a16fb7f0d5ae06927d19d50886f712a71b51f12a1701ed53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2111-3269</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2445951832/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2445951832?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25730,27320,27900,27901,33750,36988,36989,44565,53765,53767,75095</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32970725$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Charbonneau, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Karolann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blais, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiset, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Implicit race attitudes modulate visual information extraction for trustworthiness judgments</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Black people are still considered to be one of the most stigmatized groups and have to face multiple prejudices that undermine their well-being. Assumptions and beliefs about other racial groups are quite pervasive and have been shown to impact basic social tasks such as face processing. For example, individuals with high racial prejudice conceptualize other-race faces as less trustworthy and more criminal. However, it is unknown if implicit racial bias could modulate even low-level perceptual mechanisms such as spatial frequency (SF) extraction when judging the level of trustworthiness of other-race faces. The present study showed that although similar facial features are used to judge the trustworthiness of White and Black faces, own-race faces are processed in lower SF (i.e. coarse information such as the contour of the face and blurred shapes as opposed to high SF representing fine-grained information such as eyelashes or fine wrinkles). This pattern was modulated by implicit race biases: higher implicit biases are associated with a significantly higher reliance on low SF with White than with Black faces.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Black or African American</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Blacks</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Facial Expression</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frequency dependence</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information retrieval</subject><subject>Judgment - ethics</subject><subject>Judgment - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Pattern recognition</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Racism - ethics</subject><subject>Racism - psychology</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><subject>Trust (Psychology)</subject><subject>Trustworthiness</subject><subject>Well being</subject><subject>White People - psychology</subject><subject>Whites</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkkuLFDEUhQtRnHH0H4gWCOKm26RSedRGGAYfDQNudCeEW0mqO02q0uYx6r831V0zzIirXG6-nNyTnKp6idEaE47f730OE7j1wU9mjRrSEUQfVee4I82KNYg8vlefVc9i3CNEiWDsaXVGmo4j3tDz6sdmPDirbKoDKFNDSjZlbWI9ep0dJFPf2JjB1XYafBghWT_V5ncq9LEszTqFHNMvH9LOTibGep_1djRTis-rJwO4aF4s60X1_dPHb1dfVtdfP2-uLq9XilKeVqJhQ8-FQIy2zPC2BTw3BqQpGMS6hmvcaYqEYAPHDXDcUzyUAnOEjabkonp90j04H-XyMFE2bUs7igVpCrE5EdrDXh6CHSH8kR6sPDZ82EoIySpnpOi0AawU0UBaqqjodU87TBju-54QXrQ-LLflfjRaFacB3APRhzuT3cmtv5Gc4hYJUgTeLQLB_8wmJjnaqIxzMBmfj3MzxgTjqKBv_kH_7-7tidpCMbAz4NIuepfnH4rykhHWYtqhGWxPoAo-xmCGu6kxknOqbuXlnCq5pKoce3Xf8d2h2xiRv-W0zBE</recordid><startdate>20200924</startdate><enddate>20200924</enddate><creator>Charbonneau, Isabelle</creator><creator>Robinson, Karolann</creator><creator>Blais, Caroline</creator><creator>Fiset, Daniel</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2111-3269</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200924</creationdate><title>Implicit race attitudes modulate visual information extraction for trustworthiness judgments</title><author>Charbonneau, Isabelle ; Robinson, Karolann ; Blais, Caroline ; Fiset, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-826fb78806546e744a16fb7f0d5ae06927d19d50886f712a71b51f12a1701ed53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Black or African American</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Blacks</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Facial Expression</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frequency dependence</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information retrieval</topic><topic>Judgment - ethics</topic><topic>Judgment - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Pattern recognition</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Racism - ethics</topic><topic>Racism - psychology</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><topic>Trust (Psychology)</topic><topic>Trustworthiness</topic><topic>Well being</topic><topic>White People - psychology</topic><topic>Whites</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Charbonneau, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Karolann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blais, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiset, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Charbonneau, Isabelle</au><au>Robinson, Karolann</au><au>Blais, Caroline</au><au>Fiset, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implicit race attitudes modulate visual information extraction for trustworthiness judgments</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-09-24</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0239305</spage><epage>e0239305</epage><pages>e0239305-e0239305</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Black people are still considered to be one of the most stigmatized groups and have to face multiple prejudices that undermine their well-being. Assumptions and beliefs about other racial groups are quite pervasive and have been shown to impact basic social tasks such as face processing. For example, individuals with high racial prejudice conceptualize other-race faces as less trustworthy and more criminal. However, it is unknown if implicit racial bias could modulate even low-level perceptual mechanisms such as spatial frequency (SF) extraction when judging the level of trustworthiness of other-race faces. The present study showed that although similar facial features are used to judge the trustworthiness of White and Black faces, own-race faces are processed in lower SF (i.e. coarse information such as the contour of the face and blurred shapes as opposed to high SF representing fine-grained information such as eyelashes or fine wrinkles). This pattern was modulated by implicit race biases: higher implicit biases are associated with a significantly higher reliance on low SF with White than with Black faces.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32970725</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0239305</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2111-3269</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2020-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e0239305-e0239305
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2445951832
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adult
Attitude
Bias
Biology and Life Sciences
Black or African American
Black people
Blacks
Comparative analysis
Crime
Face
Facial Expression
Female
Frequency dependence
Happiness
Humans
Information retrieval
Judgment - ethics
Judgment - physiology
Male
Medicine and Health Sciences
Neurosciences
Pattern recognition
Prejudice
Psychological aspects
Psychological research
Race
Racism
Racism - ethics
Racism - psychology
Social aspects
Social Perception
Social Sciences
Stereotyping
Trust (Psychology)
Trustworthiness
Well being
White People - psychology
Whites
Young Adult
title Implicit race attitudes modulate visual information extraction for trustworthiness judgments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T09%3A13%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implicit%20race%20attitudes%20modulate%20visual%20information%20extraction%20for%20trustworthiness%20judgments&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Charbonneau,%20Isabelle&rft.date=2020-09-24&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0239305&rft.epage=e0239305&rft.pages=e0239305-e0239305&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0239305&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA636415902%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-826fb78806546e744a16fb7f0d5ae06927d19d50886f712a71b51f12a1701ed53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2445951832&rft_id=info:pmid/32970725&rft_galeid=A636415902&rfr_iscdi=true