Loading…

Clinical verification of 18F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer

Purpose Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is the current standard-of-care for lesion detection in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, rigorous verification of detected lesions is not always performed in routine clinical practice. To...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2020-10, Vol.15 (10), p.e0239414-e0239414
Main Authors: Meijer, Dennie, Jansen, Bernard H. E., Wondergem, Maurits, Bodar, Yves J. L., Srbljin, Sandra, Vellekoop, Annelies E., Keizer, Bram, van der Zant, Friso M., Hoekstra, Otto S., Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A., Dahele, Max, Vis, André N., Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4184-214ed47ab606d9fc568d4b13a3d0b914efe33978220ceae07bd00f557ece033f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4184-214ed47ab606d9fc568d4b13a3d0b914efe33978220ceae07bd00f557ece033f3
container_end_page e0239414
container_issue 10
container_start_page e0239414
container_title PloS one
container_volume 15
creator Meijer, Dennie
Jansen, Bernard H. E.
Wondergem, Maurits
Bodar, Yves J. L.
Srbljin, Sandra
Vellekoop, Annelies E.
Keizer, Bram
van der Zant, Friso M.
Hoekstra, Otto S.
Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.
Dahele, Max
Vis, André N.
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
description Purpose Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is the current standard-of-care for lesion detection in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, rigorous verification of detected lesions is not always performed in routine clinical practice. To aid future 18F-radiolabeled PSMA PET/CT interpretation, we aimed to identify clinical/imaging characteristics that increase the likelihood that a PSMA-avid lesion is malignant. Materials and methods 262 patients with BCR, who underwent 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT, were retrospectively analyzed. The malignant nature of 18F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions was verified through any of the following metrics: (1) positive histopathological examination; (2) additional positive imaging; (3) a ≥50% decrease in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) following irradiation of the lesion(s). Results In 226/262 PET scans (86.3%) at least one lesion suspicious for recurrent PCa was detected (‘positive scan’). In 84/226 positive scans (37.2%), at least one independent verification metric was available. PSMA PET-detected lesions were most often confirmed to be malignant (PCa) in the presence of a CT-substrate (96.5% vs. 55.6% without CT-substrate), with SUVpeak ≥3.5 (91.4% vs. 60.0% with SUVpeak
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0239414
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2448834816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_fed5bbe965cb4e7987b70f63a41adebb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2448834816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4184-214ed47ab606d9fc568d4b13a3d0b914efe33978220ceae07bd00f557ece033f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktvEzEUhUcIRB_wD5CwxIbNBHvsGXs2SCg0pVIkuihry4_rxpEzntqTovx7nGZAFLHylc_n43uvTlW9I3hBKCeftnGfBhUWYxxggRvaM8JeVOekp03dNZi-_Ks-qy5y3mLcUtF1r6szSnFDeoHPq4dl8IM3KqBHSN6VavJxQNEhIlb11-Xq9rBGt1d3tYUJzAQWBciFyMgPaCwwDFNGP_20QdpHs4Hd0SwcUAKzT6moaEwxT2oCZNRgIL2pXjkVMrydz8vqx-rqbvmtXn-_vll-WdeGEcHqhjCwjCvd4c72zrSdsEwTqqjFui-iA0p7LpoGG1CAubYYu7blYABT6uhl9f7kO4aY5bytLBvGhKBMkK4QNyfCRrWVY_I7lQ4yKi-fLmK6lypN3gSQDmyrNfRdazQD3guuOXYdVYwoC1oXr8_zb3u9A2vK4EmFZ6bPlcFv5H18lLylXHBaDD7OBik-7CFPcuezgRDUAHH_1HdPOG9IW9AP_6D_n46dKFP2nxO4P80QLI8J-v1KHhMk5wTRX4RRvGI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448834816</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical verification of 18F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Meijer, Dennie ; Jansen, Bernard H. E. ; Wondergem, Maurits ; Bodar, Yves J. L. ; Srbljin, Sandra ; Vellekoop, Annelies E. ; Keizer, Bram ; van der Zant, Friso M. ; Hoekstra, Otto S. ; Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A. ; Dahele, Max ; Vis, André N. ; Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.</creator><contributor>Chuu, Chih-Pin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Dennie ; Jansen, Bernard H. E. ; Wondergem, Maurits ; Bodar, Yves J. L. ; Srbljin, Sandra ; Vellekoop, Annelies E. ; Keizer, Bram ; van der Zant, Friso M. ; Hoekstra, Otto S. ; Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A. ; Dahele, Max ; Vis, André N. ; Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. ; Chuu, Chih-Pin</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is the current standard-of-care for lesion detection in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, rigorous verification of detected lesions is not always performed in routine clinical practice. To aid future 18F-radiolabeled PSMA PET/CT interpretation, we aimed to identify clinical/imaging characteristics that increase the likelihood that a PSMA-avid lesion is malignant. Materials and methods 262 patients with BCR, who underwent 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT, were retrospectively analyzed. The malignant nature of 18F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions was verified through any of the following metrics: (1) positive histopathological examination; (2) additional positive imaging; (3) a ≥50% decrease in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) following irradiation of the lesion(s). Results In 226/262 PET scans (86.3%) at least one lesion suspicious for recurrent PCa was detected (‘positive scan’). In 84/226 positive scans (37.2%), at least one independent verification metric was available. PSMA PET-detected lesions were most often confirmed to be malignant (PCa) in the presence of a CT-substrate (96.5% vs. 55.6% without CT-substrate), with SUVpeak ≥3.5 (91.4% vs. 60.0% with SUVpeak&lt;3.5), in patients with a PSA-level ≥2.0 ng/mL (83.7% vs. 65.7% in patients with PSA &lt;2.0ng/mL) and in patients with &gt;2 PET-positive lesions (94.1% vs. 64.2% in patients with 1–2 PET-positive lesions; p&lt;0.001–0.03). Conclusions In this study, the clinical verification of 18F-DCFPyL PET-positive lesions in patients with BCR was performed. Diagnostic certainty of PET-detected lesions increases in the presence of characteristic abnormalities on CT, when SUVpeak is ≥3.5, when PSA-levels exceed 2.0 ng/mL or in patients with more than two PET-positive lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239414</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33021980</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Antigens ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biopsy ; Cancer therapies ; Computed tomography ; Diagnostic systems ; Drug dosages ; Fluorine isotopes ; Irradiation ; Lesions ; Lymphatic system ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Metastasis ; Nuclear medicine ; Patients ; Positron emission ; Prostate cancer ; Prostate-specific antigen ; Radiation ; Radiation therapy ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Substrates ; Tomography ; Urology ; Verification</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-10, Vol.15 (10), p.e0239414-e0239414</ispartof><rights>2020 Meijer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Meijer et al 2020 Meijer et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4184-214ed47ab606d9fc568d4b13a3d0b914efe33978220ceae07bd00f557ece033f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4184-214ed47ab606d9fc568d4b13a3d0b914efe33978220ceae07bd00f557ece033f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8298-575X ; 0000-0002-2594-1486</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2448834816/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2448834816?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Chuu, Chih-Pin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Dennie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Bernard H. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wondergem, Maurits</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodar, Yves J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srbljin, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vellekoop, Annelies E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keizer, Bram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Zant, Friso M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoekstra, Otto S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahele, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vis, André N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical verification of 18F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Purpose Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is the current standard-of-care for lesion detection in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, rigorous verification of detected lesions is not always performed in routine clinical practice. To aid future 18F-radiolabeled PSMA PET/CT interpretation, we aimed to identify clinical/imaging characteristics that increase the likelihood that a PSMA-avid lesion is malignant. Materials and methods 262 patients with BCR, who underwent 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT, were retrospectively analyzed. The malignant nature of 18F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions was verified through any of the following metrics: (1) positive histopathological examination; (2) additional positive imaging; (3) a ≥50% decrease in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) following irradiation of the lesion(s). Results In 226/262 PET scans (86.3%) at least one lesion suspicious for recurrent PCa was detected (‘positive scan’). In 84/226 positive scans (37.2%), at least one independent verification metric was available. PSMA PET-detected lesions were most often confirmed to be malignant (PCa) in the presence of a CT-substrate (96.5% vs. 55.6% without CT-substrate), with SUVpeak ≥3.5 (91.4% vs. 60.0% with SUVpeak&lt;3.5), in patients with a PSA-level ≥2.0 ng/mL (83.7% vs. 65.7% in patients with PSA &lt;2.0ng/mL) and in patients with &gt;2 PET-positive lesions (94.1% vs. 64.2% in patients with 1–2 PET-positive lesions; p&lt;0.001–0.03). Conclusions In this study, the clinical verification of 18F-DCFPyL PET-positive lesions in patients with BCR was performed. Diagnostic certainty of PET-detected lesions increases in the presence of characteristic abnormalities on CT, when SUVpeak is ≥3.5, when PSA-levels exceed 2.0 ng/mL or in patients with more than two PET-positive lesions.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Fluorine isotopes</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostate-specific antigen</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Verification</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktvEzEUhUcIRB_wD5CwxIbNBHvsGXs2SCg0pVIkuihry4_rxpEzntqTovx7nGZAFLHylc_n43uvTlW9I3hBKCeftnGfBhUWYxxggRvaM8JeVOekp03dNZi-_Ks-qy5y3mLcUtF1r6szSnFDeoHPq4dl8IM3KqBHSN6VavJxQNEhIlb11-Xq9rBGt1d3tYUJzAQWBciFyMgPaCwwDFNGP_20QdpHs4Hd0SwcUAKzT6moaEwxT2oCZNRgIL2pXjkVMrydz8vqx-rqbvmtXn-_vll-WdeGEcHqhjCwjCvd4c72zrSdsEwTqqjFui-iA0p7LpoGG1CAubYYu7blYABT6uhl9f7kO4aY5bytLBvGhKBMkK4QNyfCRrWVY_I7lQ4yKi-fLmK6lypN3gSQDmyrNfRdazQD3guuOXYdVYwoC1oXr8_zb3u9A2vK4EmFZ6bPlcFv5H18lLylXHBaDD7OBik-7CFPcuezgRDUAHH_1HdPOG9IW9AP_6D_n46dKFP2nxO4P80QLI8J-v1KHhMk5wTRX4RRvGI</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Meijer, Dennie</creator><creator>Jansen, Bernard H. E.</creator><creator>Wondergem, Maurits</creator><creator>Bodar, Yves J. L.</creator><creator>Srbljin, Sandra</creator><creator>Vellekoop, Annelies E.</creator><creator>Keizer, Bram</creator><creator>van der Zant, Friso M.</creator><creator>Hoekstra, Otto S.</creator><creator>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.</creator><creator>Dahele, Max</creator><creator>Vis, André N.</creator><creator>Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-575X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2594-1486</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Clinical verification of 18F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer</title><author>Meijer, Dennie ; Jansen, Bernard H. E. ; Wondergem, Maurits ; Bodar, Yves J. L. ; Srbljin, Sandra ; Vellekoop, Annelies E. ; Keizer, Bram ; van der Zant, Friso M. ; Hoekstra, Otto S. ; Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A. ; Dahele, Max ; Vis, André N. ; Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4184-214ed47ab606d9fc568d4b13a3d0b914efe33978220ceae07bd00f557ece033f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Fluorine isotopes</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostate-specific antigen</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Verification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Dennie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Bernard H. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wondergem, Maurits</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodar, Yves J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srbljin, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vellekoop, Annelies E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keizer, Bram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Zant, Friso M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoekstra, Otto S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahele, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vis, André N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meijer, Dennie</au><au>Jansen, Bernard H. E.</au><au>Wondergem, Maurits</au><au>Bodar, Yves J. L.</au><au>Srbljin, Sandra</au><au>Vellekoop, Annelies E.</au><au>Keizer, Bram</au><au>van der Zant, Friso M.</au><au>Hoekstra, Otto S.</au><au>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.</au><au>Dahele, Max</au><au>Vis, André N.</au><au>Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.</au><au>Chuu, Chih-Pin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical verification of 18F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0239414</spage><epage>e0239414</epage><pages>e0239414-e0239414</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Purpose Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is the current standard-of-care for lesion detection in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, rigorous verification of detected lesions is not always performed in routine clinical practice. To aid future 18F-radiolabeled PSMA PET/CT interpretation, we aimed to identify clinical/imaging characteristics that increase the likelihood that a PSMA-avid lesion is malignant. Materials and methods 262 patients with BCR, who underwent 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT, were retrospectively analyzed. The malignant nature of 18F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions was verified through any of the following metrics: (1) positive histopathological examination; (2) additional positive imaging; (3) a ≥50% decrease in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) following irradiation of the lesion(s). Results In 226/262 PET scans (86.3%) at least one lesion suspicious for recurrent PCa was detected (‘positive scan’). In 84/226 positive scans (37.2%), at least one independent verification metric was available. PSMA PET-detected lesions were most often confirmed to be malignant (PCa) in the presence of a CT-substrate (96.5% vs. 55.6% without CT-substrate), with SUVpeak ≥3.5 (91.4% vs. 60.0% with SUVpeak&lt;3.5), in patients with a PSA-level ≥2.0 ng/mL (83.7% vs. 65.7% in patients with PSA &lt;2.0ng/mL) and in patients with &gt;2 PET-positive lesions (94.1% vs. 64.2% in patients with 1–2 PET-positive lesions; p&lt;0.001–0.03). Conclusions In this study, the clinical verification of 18F-DCFPyL PET-positive lesions in patients with BCR was performed. Diagnostic certainty of PET-detected lesions increases in the presence of characteristic abnormalities on CT, when SUVpeak is ≥3.5, when PSA-levels exceed 2.0 ng/mL or in patients with more than two PET-positive lesions.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33021980</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0239414</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-575X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2594-1486</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2020-10, Vol.15 (10), p.e0239414-e0239414
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2448834816
source PubMed Central (Open Access); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Abnormalities
Antigens
Biology and Life Sciences
Biopsy
Cancer therapies
Computed tomography
Diagnostic systems
Drug dosages
Fluorine isotopes
Irradiation
Lesions
Lymphatic system
Medical diagnosis
Medical imaging
Medicine and Health Sciences
Metastasis
Nuclear medicine
Patients
Positron emission
Prostate cancer
Prostate-specific antigen
Radiation
Radiation therapy
Research and Analysis Methods
Substrates
Tomography
Urology
Verification
title Clinical verification of 18F-DCFPyL PET-detected lesions in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A14%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20verification%20of%2018F-DCFPyL%20PET-detected%20lesions%20in%20patients%20with%20biochemically%20recurrent%20prostate%20cancer&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Meijer,%20Dennie&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0239414&rft.epage=e0239414&rft.pages=e0239414-e0239414&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0239414&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2448834816%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4184-214ed47ab606d9fc568d4b13a3d0b914efe33978220ceae07bd00f557ece033f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448834816&rft_id=info:pmid/33021980&rfr_iscdi=true