Loading…
'Intelligent' lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown
The COVID-19 pandemic is more than a public health crisis. Lockdown measures have substantial societal effects, including a significant impact on parents with (young) children. Given the existence of persistent gender inequality prior to the pandemic, particularly among parents, it is crucial to stu...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0242249-e0242249 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-10bd01b8ac9711957d59ac9a7ea4a20bbed7e7b232030bbc29840a68ca8bd2e03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-10bd01b8ac9711957d59ac9a7ea4a20bbed7e7b232030bbc29840a68ca8bd2e03 |
container_end_page | e0242249 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e0242249 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Yerkes, Mara A André, Stéfanie C H Besamusca, Janna W Kruyen, Peter M Remery, Chantal L H S van der Zwan, Roos Beckers, Debby G J Geurts, Sabine A E |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic is more than a public health crisis. Lockdown measures have substantial societal effects, including a significant impact on parents with (young) children. Given the existence of persistent gender inequality prior to the pandemic, particularly among parents, it is crucial to study the societal impact of COVID-19 from a gender perspective. The objective of this paper is to use representative survey data gathered among Dutch parents in April 2020 to explore differences between mothers and fathers in three areas: paid work, the division of childcare and household tasks, and three dimensions of quality of life (leisure, work-life balance, relationship dynamics). Additionally, we explore whether changes take place in these dimensions by comparing the situation prior to the lockdown with the situation during the lockdown.
We use descriptive methods (crosstabulations) supported by multivariate modelling (linear regression modelling for continuous outcomes; linear probability modelling (LPM) for binary outcomes (0/1 outcomes); and multinomial logits for multinomial outcomes) in a cross-sectional survey design.
Results show that the way in which parents were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic reflects a complex gendered reality. Mothers work in essential occupations more often than fathers, report more adjustments of the times at which they work, and experience both more and less work pressure in comparison to before the lockdown. Moreover, mothers continue to do more childcare and household work than fathers, but some fathers report taking on greater shares of childcare and housework during the lockdown in comparison to before. Mothers also report a larger decline in leisure time than fathers. We find no gender differences in the propensity to work from home, in perceived work-life balance, or in relationship dynamics.
In conclusion, we find that gender inequality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and the quality of life are evident during the first lockdown period. Specifically, we find evidence of an increase in gender inequality in relation to paid work and quality of life when comparing the situation prior to and during the lockdown, as well as a decrease in gender inequality in the division of childcare and household work. We conclude that the unique situation created by restrictive lockdown measures magnifies some gender inequalities while lessening others.
The insights we provide offer key comparative evidence b |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0242249 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2465725086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A643313660</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0227380fdad04003891640fcb0d9534f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A643313660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-10bd01b8ac9711957d59ac9a7ea4a20bbed7e7b232030bbc29840a68ca8bd2e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptk1tv0zAUxyMEYmPwDRBY2sOGtBZfcn0BTRWXShNICJ4tx3Zad47d2UmnfmK-Bic0LSuaIiX2ye_8fS4-SfKa4ClhBXm_8n1wwk7X3ukppimlafUkOSUVo5OcYvb0wfokeRHjCuOMlXn-PDlhjGaMsvI0-X0xd5221iy06y6Q9fJW-Xt3hcw_M9JNo2UXP6IfOva2i6gJvkUCxT5s9BZ5hwBTOqBL497pu15Y021BAa2FUejeh9sr1C01UmZjogHcN0gujVVSBI2EU2jp-6iX3u7pwbbXAdiaBrjWuwVIBggpDuqD5DcN72CBj0j1wQAxmGd-Y9SEVIeEXibPGmGjfjV-z5Jfnz_9nH2d3Hz_Mp9d30xknlXdhOBaYVKXQlYFIVVWqKyCtSi0SAXFda1VoYuaMigq7CStyhSLvJSirBXVmJ0lb3e6a-sjH3sUOU3zrKAZLnMg5jtCebHi62BaEbbcC8P_GnxYcBE6I63mmNKClbhRQuEUY1ZWJE9xI2usqoylDWh9GE_r61YrCZUJwh6JHv9xZskXfsOLArMqJyBwOQoEf9fr2PHWRAmNF05DS4a4c5ySkmSAnv-HPp7dSC0EJGBc4-FcOYjy6zxljDAQBGr6CAWP0q2RcKEbA_Yjh3TnIIOPMejmkCPBfBiHfTB8GAc-jgO4vXlYn4PT_v6zP5TxC1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2465725086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>'Intelligent' lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Yerkes, Mara A ; André, Stéfanie C H ; Besamusca, Janna W ; Kruyen, Peter M ; Remery, Chantal L H S ; van der Zwan, Roos ; Beckers, Debby G J ; Geurts, Sabine A E</creator><contributor>Goli, Srinivas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yerkes, Mara A ; André, Stéfanie C H ; Besamusca, Janna W ; Kruyen, Peter M ; Remery, Chantal L H S ; van der Zwan, Roos ; Beckers, Debby G J ; Geurts, Sabine A E ; Goli, Srinivas</creatorcontrib><description>The COVID-19 pandemic is more than a public health crisis. Lockdown measures have substantial societal effects, including a significant impact on parents with (young) children. Given the existence of persistent gender inequality prior to the pandemic, particularly among parents, it is crucial to study the societal impact of COVID-19 from a gender perspective. The objective of this paper is to use representative survey data gathered among Dutch parents in April 2020 to explore differences between mothers and fathers in three areas: paid work, the division of childcare and household tasks, and three dimensions of quality of life (leisure, work-life balance, relationship dynamics). Additionally, we explore whether changes take place in these dimensions by comparing the situation prior to the lockdown with the situation during the lockdown.
We use descriptive methods (crosstabulations) supported by multivariate modelling (linear regression modelling for continuous outcomes; linear probability modelling (LPM) for binary outcomes (0/1 outcomes); and multinomial logits for multinomial outcomes) in a cross-sectional survey design.
Results show that the way in which parents were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic reflects a complex gendered reality. Mothers work in essential occupations more often than fathers, report more adjustments of the times at which they work, and experience both more and less work pressure in comparison to before the lockdown. Moreover, mothers continue to do more childcare and household work than fathers, but some fathers report taking on greater shares of childcare and housework during the lockdown in comparison to before. Mothers also report a larger decline in leisure time than fathers. We find no gender differences in the propensity to work from home, in perceived work-life balance, or in relationship dynamics.
In conclusion, we find that gender inequality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and the quality of life are evident during the first lockdown period. Specifically, we find evidence of an increase in gender inequality in relation to paid work and quality of life when comparing the situation prior to and during the lockdown, as well as a decrease in gender inequality in the division of childcare and household work. We conclude that the unique situation created by restrictive lockdown measures magnifies some gender inequalities while lessening others.
The insights we provide offer key comparative evidence based on a representative, probability-based sample for understanding the broader impact of lockdown measures as we move forward in the COVID-19 pandemic. One of the limitations in this study is the cross-sectional design. Further study, in the form of a longitudinal design, will be crucial in investigating the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gender inequality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242249</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33253238</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Child ; Child care ; Child Care - statistics & numerical data ; Children ; Control ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Design ; Education ; Emergency medical care ; Epidemics ; Families & family life ; Family Characteristics ; Female ; Female-male relations ; Funeral industry ; Gender ; Gender aspects ; Gender equity ; Households ; Housekeeping ; Humans ; Inequality ; Leisure Activities ; Male ; Marriage ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Modelling ; Netherlands ; Occupations ; Pandemics ; Parents ; Parents & parenting ; People and Places ; Polls & surveys ; Public health ; Quality of Life ; Quarantine - psychology ; Quarantine - statistics & numerical data ; Sex differences ; Shelter in place ; Social aspects ; Social Sciences ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Statistical analysis ; Stay-at-home orders (Public safety) ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Wage gap ; Women ; Work - economics ; Work - statistics & numerical data]]></subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0242249-e0242249</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Yerkes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Yerkes et al 2020 Yerkes et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-10bd01b8ac9711957d59ac9a7ea4a20bbed7e7b232030bbc29840a68ca8bd2e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-10bd01b8ac9711957d59ac9a7ea4a20bbed7e7b232030bbc29840a68ca8bd2e03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5480-4878 ; 0000-0002-5343-0667</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2465725086?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2465725086?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,53791,53793,74412,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33253238$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Goli, Srinivas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yerkes, Mara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>André, Stéfanie C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besamusca, Janna W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruyen, Peter M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remery, Chantal L H S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Zwan, Roos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckers, Debby G J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geurts, Sabine A E</creatorcontrib><title>'Intelligent' lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The COVID-19 pandemic is more than a public health crisis. Lockdown measures have substantial societal effects, including a significant impact on parents with (young) children. Given the existence of persistent gender inequality prior to the pandemic, particularly among parents, it is crucial to study the societal impact of COVID-19 from a gender perspective. The objective of this paper is to use representative survey data gathered among Dutch parents in April 2020 to explore differences between mothers and fathers in three areas: paid work, the division of childcare and household tasks, and three dimensions of quality of life (leisure, work-life balance, relationship dynamics). Additionally, we explore whether changes take place in these dimensions by comparing the situation prior to the lockdown with the situation during the lockdown.
We use descriptive methods (crosstabulations) supported by multivariate modelling (linear regression modelling for continuous outcomes; linear probability modelling (LPM) for binary outcomes (0/1 outcomes); and multinomial logits for multinomial outcomes) in a cross-sectional survey design.
Results show that the way in which parents were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic reflects a complex gendered reality. Mothers work in essential occupations more often than fathers, report more adjustments of the times at which they work, and experience both more and less work pressure in comparison to before the lockdown. Moreover, mothers continue to do more childcare and household work than fathers, but some fathers report taking on greater shares of childcare and housework during the lockdown in comparison to before. Mothers also report a larger decline in leisure time than fathers. We find no gender differences in the propensity to work from home, in perceived work-life balance, or in relationship dynamics.
In conclusion, we find that gender inequality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and the quality of life are evident during the first lockdown period. Specifically, we find evidence of an increase in gender inequality in relation to paid work and quality of life when comparing the situation prior to and during the lockdown, as well as a decrease in gender inequality in the division of childcare and household work. We conclude that the unique situation created by restrictive lockdown measures magnifies some gender inequalities while lessening others.
The insights we provide offer key comparative evidence based on a representative, probability-based sample for understanding the broader impact of lockdown measures as we move forward in the COVID-19 pandemic. One of the limitations in this study is the cross-sectional design. Further study, in the form of a longitudinal design, will be crucial in investigating the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gender inequality.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Child Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family Characteristics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female-male relations</subject><subject>Funeral industry</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housekeeping</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Leisure Activities</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quarantine - psychology</subject><subject>Quarantine - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Shelter in place</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stay-at-home orders (Public safety)</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Wage gap</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Work - economics</subject><subject>Work - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptk1tv0zAUxyMEYmPwDRBY2sOGtBZfcn0BTRWXShNICJ4tx3Zad47d2UmnfmK-Bic0LSuaIiX2ye_8fS4-SfKa4ClhBXm_8n1wwk7X3ukppimlafUkOSUVo5OcYvb0wfokeRHjCuOMlXn-PDlhjGaMsvI0-X0xd5221iy06y6Q9fJW-Xt3hcw_M9JNo2UXP6IfOva2i6gJvkUCxT5s9BZ5hwBTOqBL497pu15Y021BAa2FUejeh9sr1C01UmZjogHcN0gujVVSBI2EU2jp-6iX3u7pwbbXAdiaBrjWuwVIBggpDuqD5DcN72CBj0j1wQAxmGd-Y9SEVIeEXibPGmGjfjV-z5Jfnz_9nH2d3Hz_Mp9d30xknlXdhOBaYVKXQlYFIVVWqKyCtSi0SAXFda1VoYuaMigq7CStyhSLvJSirBXVmJ0lb3e6a-sjH3sUOU3zrKAZLnMg5jtCebHi62BaEbbcC8P_GnxYcBE6I63mmNKClbhRQuEUY1ZWJE9xI2usqoylDWh9GE_r61YrCZUJwh6JHv9xZskXfsOLArMqJyBwOQoEf9fr2PHWRAmNF05DS4a4c5ySkmSAnv-HPp7dSC0EJGBc4-FcOYjy6zxljDAQBGr6CAWP0q2RcKEbA_Yjh3TnIIOPMejmkCPBfBiHfTB8GAc-jgO4vXlYn4PT_v6zP5TxC1Q</recordid><startdate>20201130</startdate><enddate>20201130</enddate><creator>Yerkes, Mara A</creator><creator>André, Stéfanie C H</creator><creator>Besamusca, Janna W</creator><creator>Kruyen, Peter M</creator><creator>Remery, Chantal L H S</creator><creator>van der Zwan, Roos</creator><creator>Beckers, Debby G J</creator><creator>Geurts, Sabine A E</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5480-4878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5343-0667</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201130</creationdate><title>'Intelligent' lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown</title><author>Yerkes, Mara A ; André, Stéfanie C H ; Besamusca, Janna W ; Kruyen, Peter M ; Remery, Chantal L H S ; van der Zwan, Roos ; Beckers, Debby G J ; Geurts, Sabine A E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-10bd01b8ac9711957d59ac9a7ea4a20bbed7e7b232030bbc29840a68ca8bd2e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Child Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family Characteristics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female-male relations</topic><topic>Funeral industry</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housekeeping</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Leisure Activities</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quarantine - psychology</topic><topic>Quarantine - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Shelter in place</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stay-at-home orders (Public safety)</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Wage gap</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Work - economics</topic><topic>Work - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yerkes, Mara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>André, Stéfanie C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besamusca, Janna W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruyen, Peter M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remery, Chantal L H S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Zwan, Roos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckers, Debby G J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geurts, Sabine A E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yerkes, Mara A</au><au>André, Stéfanie C H</au><au>Besamusca, Janna W</au><au>Kruyen, Peter M</au><au>Remery, Chantal L H S</au><au>van der Zwan, Roos</au><au>Beckers, Debby G J</au><au>Geurts, Sabine A E</au><au>Goli, Srinivas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>'Intelligent' lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-11-30</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0242249</spage><epage>e0242249</epage><pages>e0242249-e0242249</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The COVID-19 pandemic is more than a public health crisis. Lockdown measures have substantial societal effects, including a significant impact on parents with (young) children. Given the existence of persistent gender inequality prior to the pandemic, particularly among parents, it is crucial to study the societal impact of COVID-19 from a gender perspective. The objective of this paper is to use representative survey data gathered among Dutch parents in April 2020 to explore differences between mothers and fathers in three areas: paid work, the division of childcare and household tasks, and three dimensions of quality of life (leisure, work-life balance, relationship dynamics). Additionally, we explore whether changes take place in these dimensions by comparing the situation prior to the lockdown with the situation during the lockdown.
We use descriptive methods (crosstabulations) supported by multivariate modelling (linear regression modelling for continuous outcomes; linear probability modelling (LPM) for binary outcomes (0/1 outcomes); and multinomial logits for multinomial outcomes) in a cross-sectional survey design.
Results show that the way in which parents were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic reflects a complex gendered reality. Mothers work in essential occupations more often than fathers, report more adjustments of the times at which they work, and experience both more and less work pressure in comparison to before the lockdown. Moreover, mothers continue to do more childcare and household work than fathers, but some fathers report taking on greater shares of childcare and housework during the lockdown in comparison to before. Mothers also report a larger decline in leisure time than fathers. We find no gender differences in the propensity to work from home, in perceived work-life balance, or in relationship dynamics.
In conclusion, we find that gender inequality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and the quality of life are evident during the first lockdown period. Specifically, we find evidence of an increase in gender inequality in relation to paid work and quality of life when comparing the situation prior to and during the lockdown, as well as a decrease in gender inequality in the division of childcare and household work. We conclude that the unique situation created by restrictive lockdown measures magnifies some gender inequalities while lessening others.
The insights we provide offer key comparative evidence based on a representative, probability-based sample for understanding the broader impact of lockdown measures as we move forward in the COVID-19 pandemic. One of the limitations in this study is the cross-sectional design. Further study, in the form of a longitudinal design, will be crucial in investigating the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gender inequality.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33253238</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0242249</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5480-4878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5343-0667</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0242249-e0242249 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2465725086 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Adult Child Child care Child Care - statistics & numerical data Children Control Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology Design Education Emergency medical care Epidemics Families & family life Family Characteristics Female Female-male relations Funeral industry Gender Gender aspects Gender equity Households Housekeeping Humans Inequality Leisure Activities Male Marriage Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Modelling Netherlands Occupations Pandemics Parents Parents & parenting People and Places Polls & surveys Public health Quality of Life Quarantine - psychology Quarantine - statistics & numerical data Sex differences Shelter in place Social aspects Social Sciences Socioeconomic Factors Statistical analysis Stay-at-home orders (Public safety) Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Wage gap Women Work - economics Work - statistics & numerical data |
title | 'Intelligent' lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A29%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle='Intelligent'%20lockdown,%20intelligent%20effects?%20Results%20from%20a%20survey%20on%20gender%20(in)equality%20in%20paid%20work,%20the%20division%20of%20childcare%20and%20household%20work,%20and%20quality%20of%20life%20among%20parents%20in%20the%20Netherlands%20during%20the%20Covid-19%20lockdown&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Yerkes,%20Mara%20A&rft.date=2020-11-30&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0242249&rft.epage=e0242249&rft.pages=e0242249-e0242249&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0242249&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA643313660%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659t-10bd01b8ac9711957d59ac9a7ea4a20bbed7e7b232030bbc29840a68ca8bd2e03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2465725086&rft_id=info:pmid/33253238&rft_galeid=A643313660&rfr_iscdi=true |