An institutional analysis of graduate outcomes reveals a contemporary workforce footprint for biomedical master's degrees

• Published in: PloS one 2020-12, Vol.15 (12), p.e0243153-e0243153
• Main Authors: Hart, Jack, McKinney, Caleb C
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Academic degrees; Biochemistry; Biological Science Disciplines - education; Biological Science Disciplines - statistics & numerical data; Biomedical engineering; Biomedical materials; Biophysics; Careers; Colleges & universities; Curricula; Education, Graduate - statistics & numerical data; Enrollments; Ethnicity; Female; Forecasts and trends; Graduate students; Graduate studies; Growth; Health care facilities; Health Personnel - education; Health Personnel - statistics & numerical data; Health physics; Health sciences; Higher education; Humans; Industrial development; Labor force; Life sciences; Male; Market share; Masters degrees; Medical research; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Molecular biology; Neurosciences; Pacific Islander people; People and Places; Physiology; Professional development; Return on investment; Science Policy; Skills; Social Sciences; Statistics; Students; Training; Trends; United States; Universities; User statistics; Workforce; Workforce - statistics & numerical data
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243153

There is continued growth in the number of master's degrees awarded in the life sciences to address the evolving needs of the biomedical workforce. Academic medical centers leverage the expertise of their faculty and industry partners to develop one to two year intensive and multidisciplinary master's programs that equip students with advanced scientific skills and practical training experiences. However, there is little data published on the outcomes of these graduates to evaluate the effectiveness of these programs and to inform the return on investment of students. Here, the authors show the first five-year career outlook for master of science graduates from programs housed at an academic medical center. Georgetown University Biomedical Graduate Education researchers analyzed the placement outcomes of 1,204 graduates from 2014-2018, and the two-year outcomes of 412 graduates from 2016 and 2017. From the 15 M.S. programs analyzed, they found that 69% of graduates entered the workforce, while 28% entered an advanced degree program such as a Ph.D., allopathic or osteopathic medicine (M.D. or D.O.), or health professions degree. International students who pursue advanced degrees largely pursued Ph.D. degrees, while domestic students represent the majority of students entering into medical programs. Researchers found that a majority of the alumni that entered the workforce pursue research-based work, with 59% of graduates conducting research-based job functions across industries. Forty-nine percent of employed graduates analyzed from 2016 and 2017 changed employment positions, while 15% entered advanced degree programs. Alumni that changed positions changed companies in the same job function, changed to a position of increasing responsibility in the same or different organization, or changed to a different job function in the same or different company. Overall, standalone master's programs equip graduates with research skills, analytical prowess, and content expertise, strengthening the talent pipeline of the biomedical workforce.