Loading…

A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants

Dual degrees combining and MD with another professional degree (MPH, MBA, or PhD) are becoming more common in an attempt to increase an applicant's competitivity for a residency. This study was designed to assess differences in MD-only and dual degree MD applicants with respect to applicant cha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2020-12, Vol.15 (12), p.e0244147-e0244147
Main Authors: Christensen, Bryce R, Becnel, Chad M, Chan, Leland P, Minetos, Paul D, Clarke, John F, Kahn, Marc J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Dual degrees combining and MD with another professional degree (MPH, MBA, or PhD) are becoming more common in an attempt to increase an applicant's competitivity for a residency. This study was designed to assess differences in MD-only and dual degree MD applicants with respect to applicant characteristics and match outcomes. Utilizing the voluntarily-reported publicly available 2017-2019 Texas STAR database, we assessed applicants from 115 medical schools. Texas STAR indicates that over this time period, there were 18,224 responses for a response rate of 43.8%. Comparisons were made between groups using student's t-test and chi-squared analysis. Compared to MD only students, MD/MPH applicants had a higher propensity towards primary care specialties. MD/PhD applicants did not differ versus MD only applicants in their selection of primary care specialties, or of competitive specialties. MD/MBA applicants chose more competitive specialties and less primary care specialties. Despite all these differences, match rates were not different comparing MD only and dual-degree students. Despite the growing popularity of combined MD programs, such programs do not appear to increase applicant match competitivity.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0244147