Loading…

The effect of breast density on the missed lesion rate in screening digital mammography determined using an adjustable-density breast phantom tailored to Japanese women

Despite the high risk of missing lesions in mammography, the missed lesion rate is yet to be clinically established. Further, no breast phantoms with adjustable breast density currently exist. We developed a novel, adjustable-density breast phantom with a composition identical to that of actual brea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2021-01, Vol.16 (1), p.e0245060-e0245060
Main Authors: Yamamuro, Mika, Asai, Yoshiyuki, Hashimoto, Naomi, Yasuda, Nao, Ozaki, Yoshiaki, Ishii, Kazunari, Lee, Yongbum
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-78dfa58cb986d173e1fbb613fc842813e958f284128e2cba060f70b69bd099c53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-78dfa58cb986d173e1fbb613fc842813e958f284128e2cba060f70b69bd099c53
container_end_page e0245060
container_issue 1
container_start_page e0245060
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Yamamuro, Mika
Asai, Yoshiyuki
Hashimoto, Naomi
Yasuda, Nao
Ozaki, Yoshiaki
Ishii, Kazunari
Lee, Yongbum
description Despite the high risk of missing lesions in mammography, the missed lesion rate is yet to be clinically established. Further, no breast phantoms with adjustable breast density currently exist. We developed a novel, adjustable-density breast phantom with a composition identical to that of actual breasts, and determined the quantitative relationship between breast density and the missed lesion rate in mammography. An original breast phantom consisting of adipose- and fibroglandular-equivalent materials was developed, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study was performed. Breast density, which is the fraction by weight of fibroglandular to total tissue, was adjusted to 25%, 50%, and 75% by arbitrarily mixing the two materials. Microcalcification, mass lesions, and spiculated lesions, each with unique characteristics, were inserted into the phantom. For the above-mentioned fibroglandular densities, 50 positive and 50 negative images for each lesion type were used as case samples for the ROC study. Five certified radiological technologists participated in lesion detection. The mass-lesion detection rate, according to the area under the curve, decreased by 18.0% (p = 0.0001, 95% Confidence intervals [CI] = 0.1258 to 0.1822) and 37.8% (p = 0.0003, 95% CI = 0.2453 to 0.4031) for breast densities of 50% and 75%, respectively, compared to that for a 25% breast density. A similar tendency was observed with microcalcification; however, spiculated lesions did not follow this tendency. We quantified the missed lesion rate in different densities of breast tissue using a novel breast phantom, which is imperative for advancing individualized screening mammography.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0245060
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2476219517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A650815038</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d7d8be830f0742b990a4c086e03aa4c0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A650815038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-78dfa58cb986d173e1fbb613fc842813e958f284128e2cba060f70b69bd099c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99uFCEUxidGY2v1DYySmBi92BWGmYG5MWka_9Q0aaLVW8Iwh1k2DKzAqPtGPqasO226pheGC8jh930HDpyieErwklBG3qz9FJy0y413sMRlVeMG3yuOSUvLRVNiev_W-qh4FOMa45rypnlYHFFaEcIrdlz8vloBAq1BJeQ16gLImFAPLpq0Rd6hlPdHEyP0yEI0ORJkAmQciioAOOMG1JvBJGnRKMfRD0FuVttskSCMxmXdFHeQdEj26ykm2VlYXGeYE25W0iU_oiSN9SFrkkef5EY6iIB--hHc4-KBljbCk3k-Kb6-f3d19nFxcfnh_Oz0YqFYzdOC8V7Lmquu5U1PGAWiu64hVCtelZxQaGuuS16RkkOpOpmLphnumrbrcduqmp4Uz_e-G-ujmIscRVmxpiRtnS1PivM90Xu5FptgRhm2wksj_gZ8GIQMySgLomc974BTrDGryq5tsawU5g1gKner7PV2zjZ1I_QKXArSHpge7jizEoP_IRhrcUmrbPBqNgj--wQxifxYCqzNpfPT_tx1w0rGM_riH_Tu283UIPMFjNM-51U7U3Ha1JiTGtOd1_IOKo8eRqPyj9Qmxw8Erw8EmUnwKw1yilGcf_n8_-zlt0P25S12BdKmVfR2SvmnxkOw2oMq-BgD6JsiEyx2DXVdDbFrKDE3VJY9u_1AN6LrDqJ_AIyeHjE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2476219517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of breast density on the missed lesion rate in screening digital mammography determined using an adjustable-density breast phantom tailored to Japanese women</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Yamamuro, Mika ; Asai, Yoshiyuki ; Hashimoto, Naomi ; Yasuda, Nao ; Ozaki, Yoshiaki ; Ishii, Kazunari ; Lee, Yongbum</creator><contributor>Baltzer, Pascal A. T.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yamamuro, Mika ; Asai, Yoshiyuki ; Hashimoto, Naomi ; Yasuda, Nao ; Ozaki, Yoshiaki ; Ishii, Kazunari ; Lee, Yongbum ; Baltzer, Pascal A. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the high risk of missing lesions in mammography, the missed lesion rate is yet to be clinically established. Further, no breast phantoms with adjustable breast density currently exist. We developed a novel, adjustable-density breast phantom with a composition identical to that of actual breasts, and determined the quantitative relationship between breast density and the missed lesion rate in mammography. An original breast phantom consisting of adipose- and fibroglandular-equivalent materials was developed, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study was performed. Breast density, which is the fraction by weight of fibroglandular to total tissue, was adjusted to 25%, 50%, and 75% by arbitrarily mixing the two materials. Microcalcification, mass lesions, and spiculated lesions, each with unique characteristics, were inserted into the phantom. For the above-mentioned fibroglandular densities, 50 positive and 50 negative images for each lesion type were used as case samples for the ROC study. Five certified radiological technologists participated in lesion detection. The mass-lesion detection rate, according to the area under the curve, decreased by 18.0% (p = 0.0001, 95% Confidence intervals [CI] = 0.1258 to 0.1822) and 37.8% (p = 0.0003, 95% CI = 0.2453 to 0.4031) for breast densities of 50% and 75%, respectively, compared to that for a 25% breast density. A similar tendency was observed with microcalcification; however, spiculated lesions did not follow this tendency. We quantified the missed lesion rate in different densities of breast tissue using a novel breast phantom, which is imperative for advancing individualized screening mammography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245060</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33411847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Breast ; Breast - diagnostic imaging ; Breast cancer ; Breast Density ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Confidence intervals ; Density ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Female ; Health risks ; Health sciences ; Humans ; Japan ; Lesions ; Mammography ; Mammography - methods ; Medical screening ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Mortality ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Polymethyl methacrylate ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Resins ; Technologists ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-01, Vol.16 (1), p.e0245060-e0245060</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Yamamuro et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Yamamuro et al 2021 Yamamuro et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-78dfa58cb986d173e1fbb613fc842813e958f284128e2cba060f70b69bd099c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-78dfa58cb986d173e1fbb613fc842813e958f284128e2cba060f70b69bd099c53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7314-4481</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2476219517/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2476219517?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33411847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Baltzer, Pascal A. T.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yamamuro, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asai, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Nao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozaki, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishii, Kazunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yongbum</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of breast density on the missed lesion rate in screening digital mammography determined using an adjustable-density breast phantom tailored to Japanese women</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Despite the high risk of missing lesions in mammography, the missed lesion rate is yet to be clinically established. Further, no breast phantoms with adjustable breast density currently exist. We developed a novel, adjustable-density breast phantom with a composition identical to that of actual breasts, and determined the quantitative relationship between breast density and the missed lesion rate in mammography. An original breast phantom consisting of adipose- and fibroglandular-equivalent materials was developed, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study was performed. Breast density, which is the fraction by weight of fibroglandular to total tissue, was adjusted to 25%, 50%, and 75% by arbitrarily mixing the two materials. Microcalcification, mass lesions, and spiculated lesions, each with unique characteristics, were inserted into the phantom. For the above-mentioned fibroglandular densities, 50 positive and 50 negative images for each lesion type were used as case samples for the ROC study. Five certified radiological technologists participated in lesion detection. The mass-lesion detection rate, according to the area under the curve, decreased by 18.0% (p = 0.0001, 95% Confidence intervals [CI] = 0.1258 to 0.1822) and 37.8% (p = 0.0003, 95% CI = 0.2453 to 0.4031) for breast densities of 50% and 75%, respectively, compared to that for a 25% breast density. A similar tendency was observed with microcalcification; however, spiculated lesions did not follow this tendency. We quantified the missed lesion rate in different densities of breast tissue using a novel breast phantom, which is imperative for advancing individualized screening mammography.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Density</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Polymethyl methacrylate</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Resins</subject><subject>Technologists</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99uFCEUxidGY2v1DYySmBi92BWGmYG5MWka_9Q0aaLVW8Iwh1k2DKzAqPtGPqasO226pheGC8jh930HDpyieErwklBG3qz9FJy0y413sMRlVeMG3yuOSUvLRVNiev_W-qh4FOMa45rypnlYHFFaEcIrdlz8vloBAq1BJeQ16gLImFAPLpq0Rd6hlPdHEyP0yEI0ORJkAmQciioAOOMG1JvBJGnRKMfRD0FuVttskSCMxmXdFHeQdEj26ykm2VlYXGeYE25W0iU_oiSN9SFrkkef5EY6iIB--hHc4-KBljbCk3k-Kb6-f3d19nFxcfnh_Oz0YqFYzdOC8V7Lmquu5U1PGAWiu64hVCtelZxQaGuuS16RkkOpOpmLphnumrbrcduqmp4Uz_e-G-ujmIscRVmxpiRtnS1PivM90Xu5FptgRhm2wksj_gZ8GIQMySgLomc974BTrDGryq5tsawU5g1gKner7PV2zjZ1I_QKXArSHpge7jizEoP_IRhrcUmrbPBqNgj--wQxifxYCqzNpfPT_tx1w0rGM_riH_Tu283UIPMFjNM-51U7U3Ha1JiTGtOd1_IOKo8eRqPyj9Qmxw8Erw8EmUnwKw1yilGcf_n8_-zlt0P25S12BdKmVfR2SvmnxkOw2oMq-BgD6JsiEyx2DXVdDbFrKDE3VJY9u_1AN6LrDqJ_AIyeHjE</recordid><startdate>20210107</startdate><enddate>20210107</enddate><creator>Yamamuro, Mika</creator><creator>Asai, Yoshiyuki</creator><creator>Hashimoto, Naomi</creator><creator>Yasuda, Nao</creator><creator>Ozaki, Yoshiaki</creator><creator>Ishii, Kazunari</creator><creator>Lee, Yongbum</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7314-4481</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210107</creationdate><title>The effect of breast density on the missed lesion rate in screening digital mammography determined using an adjustable-density breast phantom tailored to Japanese women</title><author>Yamamuro, Mika ; Asai, Yoshiyuki ; Hashimoto, Naomi ; Yasuda, Nao ; Ozaki, Yoshiaki ; Ishii, Kazunari ; Lee, Yongbum</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-78dfa58cb986d173e1fbb613fc842813e958f284128e2cba060f70b69bd099c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Density</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Polymethyl methacrylate</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Resins</topic><topic>Technologists</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yamamuro, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asai, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Nao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozaki, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishii, Kazunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yongbum</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yamamuro, Mika</au><au>Asai, Yoshiyuki</au><au>Hashimoto, Naomi</au><au>Yasuda, Nao</au><au>Ozaki, Yoshiaki</au><au>Ishii, Kazunari</au><au>Lee, Yongbum</au><au>Baltzer, Pascal A. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of breast density on the missed lesion rate in screening digital mammography determined using an adjustable-density breast phantom tailored to Japanese women</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-01-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0245060</spage><epage>e0245060</epage><pages>e0245060-e0245060</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Despite the high risk of missing lesions in mammography, the missed lesion rate is yet to be clinically established. Further, no breast phantoms with adjustable breast density currently exist. We developed a novel, adjustable-density breast phantom with a composition identical to that of actual breasts, and determined the quantitative relationship between breast density and the missed lesion rate in mammography. An original breast phantom consisting of adipose- and fibroglandular-equivalent materials was developed, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study was performed. Breast density, which is the fraction by weight of fibroglandular to total tissue, was adjusted to 25%, 50%, and 75% by arbitrarily mixing the two materials. Microcalcification, mass lesions, and spiculated lesions, each with unique characteristics, were inserted into the phantom. For the above-mentioned fibroglandular densities, 50 positive and 50 negative images for each lesion type were used as case samples for the ROC study. Five certified radiological technologists participated in lesion detection. The mass-lesion detection rate, according to the area under the curve, decreased by 18.0% (p = 0.0001, 95% Confidence intervals [CI] = 0.1258 to 0.1822) and 37.8% (p = 0.0003, 95% CI = 0.2453 to 0.4031) for breast densities of 50% and 75%, respectively, compared to that for a 25% breast density. A similar tendency was observed with microcalcification; however, spiculated lesions did not follow this tendency. We quantified the missed lesion rate in different densities of breast tissue using a novel breast phantom, which is imperative for advancing individualized screening mammography.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33411847</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0245060</doi><tpages>e0245060</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7314-4481</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-01, Vol.16 (1), p.e0245060-e0245060
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2476219517
source PMC (PubMed Central); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Biology and Life Sciences
Breast
Breast - diagnostic imaging
Breast cancer
Breast Density
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Confidence intervals
Density
Early Detection of Cancer
Female
Health risks
Health sciences
Humans
Japan
Lesions
Mammography
Mammography - methods
Medical screening
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Mortality
Phantoms, Imaging
Polymethyl methacrylate
Research and Analysis Methods
Resins
Technologists
Womens health
title The effect of breast density on the missed lesion rate in screening digital mammography determined using an adjustable-density breast phantom tailored to Japanese women
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A29%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20breast%20density%20on%20the%20missed%20lesion%20rate%20in%20screening%20digital%20mammography%20determined%20using%20an%20adjustable-density%20breast%20phantom%20tailored%20to%20Japanese%20women&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Yamamuro,%20Mika&rft.date=2021-01-07&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0245060&rft.epage=e0245060&rft.pages=e0245060-e0245060&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0245060&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA650815038%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-78dfa58cb986d173e1fbb613fc842813e958f284128e2cba060f70b69bd099c53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2476219517&rft_id=info:pmid/33411847&rft_galeid=A650815038&rfr_iscdi=true