Loading…

Cluster analysis of resistance combinations in Escherichia coli from different human and animal populations in Germany 2014-2017

Recent findings on Antibiotic Resistance (AR) have brought renewed attention to the comparison of data on AR from human and animal sectors. This is however a major challenge since the data is not harmonized. This study performs a comparative analysis of data on resistance combinations in Escherichia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2021-01, Vol.16 (1), p.e0244413-e0244413
Main Authors: Suwono, Beneditta, Eckmanns, Tim, Kaspar, Heike, Merle, Roswitha, Zacher, Benedikt, Kollas, Chris, Weiser, Armin A, Noll, Ines, Feig, Marcel, Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-96313fbd0541e82979e603dc87ba3b5b7140e6935b30f872fc2049245c61147f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-96313fbd0541e82979e603dc87ba3b5b7140e6935b30f872fc2049245c61147f3
container_end_page e0244413
container_issue 1
container_start_page e0244413
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Suwono, Beneditta
Eckmanns, Tim
Kaspar, Heike
Merle, Roswitha
Zacher, Benedikt
Kollas, Chris
Weiser, Armin A
Noll, Ines
Feig, Marcel
Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois
description Recent findings on Antibiotic Resistance (AR) have brought renewed attention to the comparison of data on AR from human and animal sectors. This is however a major challenge since the data is not harmonized. This study performs a comparative analysis of data on resistance combinations in Escherichia coli (E. coli) from different routine surveillance and monitoring systems for human and different animal populations in Germany. Data on E. coli isolates were collected between 2014 and 2017 from human clinical isolates, non-clinical animal isolates from food-producing animals and food, and clinical animal isolates from food-producing and companion animals from national routine surveillance and monitoring for AR in Germany. Sixteen possible resistance combinations to four antibiotics-ampicillin, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin-for these populations were used for hierarchical clustering (Euclidian and average distance). All analyses were performed with the software R 3.5.1 (Rstudio 1.1.442). Data of 333,496 E. coli isolates and forty-one different human and animal populations were included in the cluster analysis. Three main clusters were detected. Within these three clusters, all human populations (intensive care unit (ICU), general ward and outpatient care) showed similar relative frequencies of the resistance combinations and clustered together. They demonstrated similarities with clinical isolates from different animal populations and most isolates from pigs from both non-clinical and clinical isolates. Isolates from healthy poultry demonstrated similarities in relative frequencies of resistance combinations and clustered together. However, they clustered separately from the human isolates. All isolates from different animal populations with low relative frequencies of resistance combinations clustered together. They also clustered separately from the human populations. Cluster analysis has been able to demonstrate the linkage among human isolates and isolates from various animal populations based on the resistance combinations. Further analyses based on these findings might support a better one-health approach for AR in Germany.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0244413
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2479448900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A649173896</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ac6a8bbfc9114a4198cadb796bd91eec</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A649173896</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-96313fbd0541e82979e603dc87ba3b5b7140e6935b30f872fc2049245c61147f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12P1CAUhhujcdfRf2C0iYnRixmhMFBuTDaTdZ1kk038uiWUHqZMaJmF1rh3_nSZne46NXthGgqB5305HDhZ9hKjBSYcf9j6IXTKLXa-gwUqKKWYPMpOsSDFnBWIPD4an2TPYtwitCQlY0-zE0Iox2XBTrPfKzfEHkKuktdNtDH3Jg-QBr3qNOTat5XtVG99F3Pb5edRNxCsbqxKa87mJvg2r60xEKDr82ZoVZfM6tRsq1y-87vB_dVfQEjATV4gTOfpx59nT4xyEV6M_Sz7_un82-rz_PLqYr06u5xrJop-LhjBxFQ1WlIMZSG4AIZIrUteKVItK44pAibIsiLIlLwwukBUFHSpGcaUGzLLXh98d85HOSYvyoJyQWkpEErE-kDUXm3lLqTww430ysrbCR82UoXeagdSaabKqjJaJHNFsSi1qisuWFULDKCT18dxt6FqodYpNUG5iel0pbON3PifkpeYp1iSwbvRIPjrAWIvWxs1OKc68MMhbo5KSvfom3_Qh083UhuVDmA749O-em8qzxgVmJMy5XiWLR6g0ldDa3V6acam-Yng_USQmB5-9Rs1xCjXX7_8P3v1Y8q-PWIbUK5vonfD7UOagvQA6uBjDGDuk4yR3BfKXTbkvlDkWChJ9ur4gu5Fd5VB_gCeKw3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479448900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cluster analysis of resistance combinations in Escherichia coli from different human and animal populations in Germany 2014-2017</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Suwono, Beneditta ; Eckmanns, Tim ; Kaspar, Heike ; Merle, Roswitha ; Zacher, Benedikt ; Kollas, Chris ; Weiser, Armin A ; Noll, Ines ; Feig, Marcel ; Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois</creator><contributor>Karunasagar, Iddya</contributor><creatorcontrib>Suwono, Beneditta ; Eckmanns, Tim ; Kaspar, Heike ; Merle, Roswitha ; Zacher, Benedikt ; Kollas, Chris ; Weiser, Armin A ; Noll, Ines ; Feig, Marcel ; Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois ; Karunasagar, Iddya</creatorcontrib><description>Recent findings on Antibiotic Resistance (AR) have brought renewed attention to the comparison of data on AR from human and animal sectors. This is however a major challenge since the data is not harmonized. This study performs a comparative analysis of data on resistance combinations in Escherichia coli (E. coli) from different routine surveillance and monitoring systems for human and different animal populations in Germany. Data on E. coli isolates were collected between 2014 and 2017 from human clinical isolates, non-clinical animal isolates from food-producing animals and food, and clinical animal isolates from food-producing and companion animals from national routine surveillance and monitoring for AR in Germany. Sixteen possible resistance combinations to four antibiotics-ampicillin, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin-for these populations were used for hierarchical clustering (Euclidian and average distance). All analyses were performed with the software R 3.5.1 (Rstudio 1.1.442). Data of 333,496 E. coli isolates and forty-one different human and animal populations were included in the cluster analysis. Three main clusters were detected. Within these three clusters, all human populations (intensive care unit (ICU), general ward and outpatient care) showed similar relative frequencies of the resistance combinations and clustered together. They demonstrated similarities with clinical isolates from different animal populations and most isolates from pigs from both non-clinical and clinical isolates. Isolates from healthy poultry demonstrated similarities in relative frequencies of resistance combinations and clustered together. However, they clustered separately from the human isolates. All isolates from different animal populations with low relative frequencies of resistance combinations clustered together. They also clustered separately from the human populations. Cluster analysis has been able to demonstrate the linkage among human isolates and isolates from various animal populations based on the resistance combinations. Further analyses based on these findings might support a better one-health approach for AR in Germany.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244413</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33471826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial resistance ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biosafety ; Cefotaxime - pharmacology ; Ciprofloxacin - pharmacology ; Cluster Analysis ; Computer programs ; Consumer protection ; Development and progression ; Drug resistance ; Drug resistance in microorganisms ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects ; Drug therapy ; E coli ; Editing ; Epidemiology ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification ; Escherichia coli infections ; Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - pathology ; Food ; Germany ; Health care ; Health risks ; Human populations ; Humans ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Laboratories ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methodology ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Microbiological research ; Monitoring ; People and places ; Populations ; Poultry - microbiology ; Public health ; Reviews ; Risk assessment ; Safety ; Software ; Surveillance ; Swine - microbiology ; Telemedicine ; Testing ; Veterinary medicine ; Visualization ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-01, Vol.16 (1), p.e0244413-e0244413</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Suwono et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Suwono et al 2021 Suwono et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-96313fbd0541e82979e603dc87ba3b5b7140e6935b30f872fc2049245c61147f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-96313fbd0541e82979e603dc87ba3b5b7140e6935b30f872fc2049245c61147f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8688-2926 ; 0000-0001-5021-6510</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2479448900/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2479448900?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,25736,27907,27908,36995,36996,44573,53774,53776,74877</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471826$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Karunasagar, Iddya</contributor><creatorcontrib>Suwono, Beneditta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckmanns, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaspar, Heike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merle, Roswitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacher, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kollas, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiser, Armin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noll, Ines</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feig, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois</creatorcontrib><title>Cluster analysis of resistance combinations in Escherichia coli from different human and animal populations in Germany 2014-2017</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Recent findings on Antibiotic Resistance (AR) have brought renewed attention to the comparison of data on AR from human and animal sectors. This is however a major challenge since the data is not harmonized. This study performs a comparative analysis of data on resistance combinations in Escherichia coli (E. coli) from different routine surveillance and monitoring systems for human and different animal populations in Germany. Data on E. coli isolates were collected between 2014 and 2017 from human clinical isolates, non-clinical animal isolates from food-producing animals and food, and clinical animal isolates from food-producing and companion animals from national routine surveillance and monitoring for AR in Germany. Sixteen possible resistance combinations to four antibiotics-ampicillin, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin-for these populations were used for hierarchical clustering (Euclidian and average distance). All analyses were performed with the software R 3.5.1 (Rstudio 1.1.442). Data of 333,496 E. coli isolates and forty-one different human and animal populations were included in the cluster analysis. Three main clusters were detected. Within these three clusters, all human populations (intensive care unit (ICU), general ward and outpatient care) showed similar relative frequencies of the resistance combinations and clustered together. They demonstrated similarities with clinical isolates from different animal populations and most isolates from pigs from both non-clinical and clinical isolates. Isolates from healthy poultry demonstrated similarities in relative frequencies of resistance combinations and clustered together. However, they clustered separately from the human isolates. All isolates from different animal populations with low relative frequencies of resistance combinations clustered together. They also clustered separately from the human populations. Cluster analysis has been able to demonstrate the linkage among human isolates and isolates from various animal populations based on the resistance combinations. Further analyses based on these findings might support a better one-health approach for AR in Germany.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biosafety</subject><subject>Cefotaxime - pharmacology</subject><subject>Ciprofloxacin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Consumer protection</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug resistance in microorganisms</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli infections</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - pathology</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Human populations</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Microbiological research</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Poultry - microbiology</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Swine - microbiology</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12P1CAUhhujcdfRf2C0iYnRixmhMFBuTDaTdZ1kk038uiWUHqZMaJmF1rh3_nSZne46NXthGgqB5305HDhZ9hKjBSYcf9j6IXTKLXa-gwUqKKWYPMpOsSDFnBWIPD4an2TPYtwitCQlY0-zE0Iox2XBTrPfKzfEHkKuktdNtDH3Jg-QBr3qNOTat5XtVG99F3Pb5edRNxCsbqxKa87mJvg2r60xEKDr82ZoVZfM6tRsq1y-87vB_dVfQEjATV4gTOfpx59nT4xyEV6M_Sz7_un82-rz_PLqYr06u5xrJop-LhjBxFQ1WlIMZSG4AIZIrUteKVItK44pAibIsiLIlLwwukBUFHSpGcaUGzLLXh98d85HOSYvyoJyQWkpEErE-kDUXm3lLqTww430ysrbCR82UoXeagdSaabKqjJaJHNFsSi1qisuWFULDKCT18dxt6FqodYpNUG5iel0pbON3PifkpeYp1iSwbvRIPjrAWIvWxs1OKc68MMhbo5KSvfom3_Qh083UhuVDmA749O-em8qzxgVmJMy5XiWLR6g0ldDa3V6acam-Yng_USQmB5-9Rs1xCjXX7_8P3v1Y8q-PWIbUK5vonfD7UOagvQA6uBjDGDuk4yR3BfKXTbkvlDkWChJ9ur4gu5Fd5VB_gCeKw3A</recordid><startdate>20210120</startdate><enddate>20210120</enddate><creator>Suwono, Beneditta</creator><creator>Eckmanns, Tim</creator><creator>Kaspar, Heike</creator><creator>Merle, Roswitha</creator><creator>Zacher, Benedikt</creator><creator>Kollas, Chris</creator><creator>Weiser, Armin A</creator><creator>Noll, Ines</creator><creator>Feig, Marcel</creator><creator>Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8688-2926</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5021-6510</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210120</creationdate><title>Cluster analysis of resistance combinations in Escherichia coli from different human and animal populations in Germany 2014-2017</title><author>Suwono, Beneditta ; Eckmanns, Tim ; Kaspar, Heike ; Merle, Roswitha ; Zacher, Benedikt ; Kollas, Chris ; Weiser, Armin A ; Noll, Ines ; Feig, Marcel ; Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-96313fbd0541e82979e603dc87ba3b5b7140e6935b30f872fc2049245c61147f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biosafety</topic><topic>Cefotaxime - pharmacology</topic><topic>Ciprofloxacin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Consumer protection</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug resistance in microorganisms</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli infections</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - pathology</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Human populations</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Microbiological research</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Poultry - microbiology</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Swine - microbiology</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suwono, Beneditta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckmanns, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaspar, Heike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merle, Roswitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacher, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kollas, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiser, Armin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noll, Ines</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feig, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suwono, Beneditta</au><au>Eckmanns, Tim</au><au>Kaspar, Heike</au><au>Merle, Roswitha</au><au>Zacher, Benedikt</au><au>Kollas, Chris</au><au>Weiser, Armin A</au><au>Noll, Ines</au><au>Feig, Marcel</au><au>Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois</au><au>Karunasagar, Iddya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cluster analysis of resistance combinations in Escherichia coli from different human and animal populations in Germany 2014-2017</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-01-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0244413</spage><epage>e0244413</epage><pages>e0244413-e0244413</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Recent findings on Antibiotic Resistance (AR) have brought renewed attention to the comparison of data on AR from human and animal sectors. This is however a major challenge since the data is not harmonized. This study performs a comparative analysis of data on resistance combinations in Escherichia coli (E. coli) from different routine surveillance and monitoring systems for human and different animal populations in Germany. Data on E. coli isolates were collected between 2014 and 2017 from human clinical isolates, non-clinical animal isolates from food-producing animals and food, and clinical animal isolates from food-producing and companion animals from national routine surveillance and monitoring for AR in Germany. Sixteen possible resistance combinations to four antibiotics-ampicillin, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin-for these populations were used for hierarchical clustering (Euclidian and average distance). All analyses were performed with the software R 3.5.1 (Rstudio 1.1.442). Data of 333,496 E. coli isolates and forty-one different human and animal populations were included in the cluster analysis. Three main clusters were detected. Within these three clusters, all human populations (intensive care unit (ICU), general ward and outpatient care) showed similar relative frequencies of the resistance combinations and clustered together. They demonstrated similarities with clinical isolates from different animal populations and most isolates from pigs from both non-clinical and clinical isolates. Isolates from healthy poultry demonstrated similarities in relative frequencies of resistance combinations and clustered together. However, they clustered separately from the human isolates. All isolates from different animal populations with low relative frequencies of resistance combinations clustered together. They also clustered separately from the human populations. Cluster analysis has been able to demonstrate the linkage among human isolates and isolates from various animal populations based on the resistance combinations. Further analyses based on these findings might support a better one-health approach for AR in Germany.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33471826</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0244413</doi><tpages>e0244413</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8688-2926</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5021-6510</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-01, Vol.16 (1), p.e0244413-e0244413
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2479448900
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Animal populations
Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
Antibiotic resistance
Antibiotics
Antimicrobial resistance
Biology and Life Sciences
Biosafety
Cefotaxime - pharmacology
Ciprofloxacin - pharmacology
Cluster Analysis
Computer programs
Consumer protection
Development and progression
Drug resistance
Drug resistance in microorganisms
Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects
Drug therapy
E coli
Editing
Epidemiology
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli - drug effects
Escherichia coli - isolation & purification
Escherichia coli infections
Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology
Escherichia coli Infections - pathology
Food
Germany
Health care
Health risks
Human populations
Humans
Infections
Infectious diseases
Laboratories
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methodology
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Microbiological research
Monitoring
People and places
Populations
Poultry - microbiology
Public health
Reviews
Risk assessment
Safety
Software
Surveillance
Swine - microbiology
Telemedicine
Testing
Veterinary medicine
Visualization
Zoonoses
title Cluster analysis of resistance combinations in Escherichia coli from different human and animal populations in Germany 2014-2017
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A06%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cluster%20analysis%20of%20resistance%20combinations%20in%20Escherichia%20coli%20from%20different%20human%20and%20animal%20populations%20in%20Germany%202014-2017&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Suwono,%20Beneditta&rft.date=2021-01-20&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0244413&rft.epage=e0244413&rft.pages=e0244413-e0244413&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0244413&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA649173896%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-96313fbd0541e82979e603dc87ba3b5b7140e6935b30f872fc2049245c61147f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479448900&rft_id=info:pmid/33471826&rft_galeid=A649173896&rfr_iscdi=true