Loading…

Sensitivity of wild-type and rifampicin-resistant O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli to elevated hydrostatic pressure and lactic acid in ground meat and meat homogenate

Various serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli have been epidemiologically associated with foodborne disease episodes in the United States and around the globe, with E. coli O157: H7 as the dominant serogroup of public health concern. Serogroups other than O157 are currently associated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0246735
Main Authors: Allison, Abimbola, Fouladkhah, Aliyar Cyrus
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f8b2fd7747e797795ed3edf1c0ec1f1849b08f98920a574356eeb27c871a67fa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f8b2fd7747e797795ed3edf1c0ec1f1849b08f98920a574356eeb27c871a67fa3
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page e0246735
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Allison, Abimbola
Fouladkhah, Aliyar Cyrus
description Various serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli have been epidemiologically associated with foodborne disease episodes in the United States and around the globe, with E. coli O157: H7 as the dominant serogroup of public health concern. Serogroups other than O157 are currently associated with about 60% of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli related foodborne illness episodes. Current study evaluated sensitivity of the O157 and epidemiologically important non-O157 serogroups of the pathogen to elevated hydrostatic pressure and 1% lactic acid. Pressure intensity of 250 to 650 MPa were applied for 0 to 7 min for inactivation of strain mixtures of wild-type and rifampicin-resistant E. coli O157, as well as O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145 serogroups and ATCC® 43895™ strain in ground meat and 10% meat homogenate. E. coli O157 were reduced (p < 0.05) from 6.86 ± 0.2 to 4.56 ± 0.1 log CFU/g when exposed to pressure of 650 MPa for 7 min. Corresponding reductions (p < 0.05) for non-O157 E. coli were from 6.98 ± 0.3 to 4.72 ± 0.1. The D-values at 650 MPa were 3.71 and 3.47 min for O157 and non-O157 serogroups, respectively. Presence of 1% lactic acid to a great extent augmented (p < 0.05) decontamination efficacy of the treatment in meat homogenate resulting in up to 5.6 and 6.0 log CFU/mL reductions for O157 and non-O157 serogroups, respectively. Among the tested serogroups, the wild-type and rifampicin-resistant phenotypes exhibited (p ≥ 0.05) comparable pressure sensitivity. Thus, these two phenotypes could be used interchangeably in validation studies. Our results also illustrate that, application of elevated hydrostatic pressure could be utilized for assuring safety of ground and non-intact meat products against various serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli. Addition of 1% lactic acid additionally provided industrially appreciable augmentation in efficacy of the pressure-based treatments.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0246735
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2491016022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A652227869</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5c1e0d83c805469caff297e17081f6b9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A652227869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f8b2fd7747e797795ed3edf1c0ec1f1849b08f98920a574356eeb27c871a67fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk81u1DAQxyMEoqXwBggsISE4ZLGdxE4uSFVVoFKlShS4Wl5nnLhK7NR2SvfleDa8H626qAfkQ5yZ3_zHM_Zk2WuCF6Tg5NOVm72Vw2JyFhaYlowX1ZPskDQFzRnFxdMH-4PsRQhXGFdFzdjz7KAoGMZliQ-zP5dgg4nmxsQVchr9NkObx9UESNoWeaPlOBllbO4hmBCljeiCVHzjtc7mm5_L3nQSRXebuMm7dk4BHToNqgdvVG8kUm4wCUAwwI2M0KJ-1XqX9KJRaEraYfbblINUa5tUpkXGos67OVlHkHHj3mx6N7oObBJ6mT3Tcgjwavc9yn5-Of1x8i0_v_h6dnJ8nivW0Jjrekl1y3nJgTecNxW0BbSaKAyKaFKXzRLXuqkbimXFy6JiAEvKVc2JZFzL4ih7u9WdBhfErvVB0LIhmDBMaSLOtkTr5JWYvBmlXwknjdgYnO-E9KmyAUSlCOC2LlSNq5I1SmpNGw6E45potmyS1uddtnk5QqvARi-HPdF9jzW96NyN4HVDOC2SwIedgHfXM4QoRhMUDIO04ObtuZuSkXKNvvsHfby6HdXJVICx2qW8ai0qjllFKeU1W5978QiVVgujUemdapPsewEf9wISE-E2dnIOQZxdfv9_9uLXPvv-AduDHGIf3DBH42zYB8stqNJrDB70fZMJFusxu-uGWI-Z2I1ZCnvz8ILug-7mqvgLFBQlHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491016022</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensitivity of wild-type and rifampicin-resistant O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli to elevated hydrostatic pressure and lactic acid in ground meat and meat homogenate</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Allison, Abimbola ; Fouladkhah, Aliyar Cyrus</creator><contributor>Venkitanarayanan, Kumar</contributor><creatorcontrib>Allison, Abimbola ; Fouladkhah, Aliyar Cyrus ; Venkitanarayanan, Kumar</creatorcontrib><description>Various serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli have been epidemiologically associated with foodborne disease episodes in the United States and around the globe, with E. coli O157: H7 as the dominant serogroup of public health concern. Serogroups other than O157 are currently associated with about 60% of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli related foodborne illness episodes. Current study evaluated sensitivity of the O157 and epidemiologically important non-O157 serogroups of the pathogen to elevated hydrostatic pressure and 1% lactic acid. Pressure intensity of 250 to 650 MPa were applied for 0 to 7 min for inactivation of strain mixtures of wild-type and rifampicin-resistant E. coli O157, as well as O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145 serogroups and ATCC® 43895™ strain in ground meat and 10% meat homogenate. E. coli O157 were reduced (p &lt; 0.05) from 6.86 ± 0.2 to 4.56 ± 0.1 log CFU/g when exposed to pressure of 650 MPa for 7 min. Corresponding reductions (p &lt; 0.05) for non-O157 E. coli were from 6.98 ± 0.3 to 4.72 ± 0.1. The D-values at 650 MPa were 3.71 and 3.47 min for O157 and non-O157 serogroups, respectively. Presence of 1% lactic acid to a great extent augmented (p &lt; 0.05) decontamination efficacy of the treatment in meat homogenate resulting in up to 5.6 and 6.0 log CFU/mL reductions for O157 and non-O157 serogroups, respectively. Among the tested serogroups, the wild-type and rifampicin-resistant phenotypes exhibited (p ≥ 0.05) comparable pressure sensitivity. Thus, these two phenotypes could be used interchangeably in validation studies. Our results also illustrate that, application of elevated hydrostatic pressure could be utilized for assuring safety of ground and non-intact meat products against various serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli. Addition of 1% lactic acid additionally provided industrially appreciable augmentation in efficacy of the pressure-based treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246735</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33600440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acids ; Agriculture ; Antiinfectives and antibacterials ; Beef ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Chemical properties ; Control ; Decontamination ; Decontamination (from gases, chemicals, etc.) ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects ; E coli ; Epidemics ; Escherichia coli ; Experiments ; Food chains ; Food inspection ; Foodborne diseases ; Health aspects ; Health risk assessment ; Health surveillance ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Hydrostatic Pressure ; Inflammatory bowel disease ; Inspection ; Laboratories ; Lactic acid ; Lactic Acid - analysis ; Limit of Detection ; Manufacturing ; Meat ; Meat industry ; Meat processing industry ; Meat Products - analysis ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Microbiology ; Microbiota ; Microbiota - drug effects ; Pathogens ; Phenotype ; Physical Sciences ; Physiological aspects ; Prevention ; Production processes ; Public health ; Rifampin ; Rifampin - pharmacology ; Risk factors ; Shiga toxin ; Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - metabolism ; Temperature ; Toxins ; Validation studies ; Yeasts</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0246735</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Allison, Fouladkhah. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Allison, Fouladkhah 2021 Allison, Fouladkhah</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f8b2fd7747e797795ed3edf1c0ec1f1849b08f98920a574356eeb27c871a67fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f8b2fd7747e797795ed3edf1c0ec1f1849b08f98920a574356eeb27c871a67fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9204-2870</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2491016022/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2491016022?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53770,53772,74873</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33600440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Venkitanarayanan, Kumar</contributor><creatorcontrib>Allison, Abimbola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fouladkhah, Aliyar Cyrus</creatorcontrib><title>Sensitivity of wild-type and rifampicin-resistant O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli to elevated hydrostatic pressure and lactic acid in ground meat and meat homogenate</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Various serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli have been epidemiologically associated with foodborne disease episodes in the United States and around the globe, with E. coli O157: H7 as the dominant serogroup of public health concern. Serogroups other than O157 are currently associated with about 60% of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli related foodborne illness episodes. Current study evaluated sensitivity of the O157 and epidemiologically important non-O157 serogroups of the pathogen to elevated hydrostatic pressure and 1% lactic acid. Pressure intensity of 250 to 650 MPa were applied for 0 to 7 min for inactivation of strain mixtures of wild-type and rifampicin-resistant E. coli O157, as well as O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145 serogroups and ATCC® 43895™ strain in ground meat and 10% meat homogenate. E. coli O157 were reduced (p &lt; 0.05) from 6.86 ± 0.2 to 4.56 ± 0.1 log CFU/g when exposed to pressure of 650 MPa for 7 min. Corresponding reductions (p &lt; 0.05) for non-O157 E. coli were from 6.98 ± 0.3 to 4.72 ± 0.1. The D-values at 650 MPa were 3.71 and 3.47 min for O157 and non-O157 serogroups, respectively. Presence of 1% lactic acid to a great extent augmented (p &lt; 0.05) decontamination efficacy of the treatment in meat homogenate resulting in up to 5.6 and 6.0 log CFU/mL reductions for O157 and non-O157 serogroups, respectively. Among the tested serogroups, the wild-type and rifampicin-resistant phenotypes exhibited (p ≥ 0.05) comparable pressure sensitivity. Thus, these two phenotypes could be used interchangeably in validation studies. Our results also illustrate that, application of elevated hydrostatic pressure could be utilized for assuring safety of ground and non-intact meat products against various serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli. Addition of 1% lactic acid additionally provided industrially appreciable augmentation in efficacy of the pressure-based treatments.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chemical properties</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Decontamination</subject><subject>Decontamination (from gases, chemicals, etc.)</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Food inspection</subject><subject>Foodborne diseases</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Health surveillance</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Hydrostatic Pressure</subject><subject>Inflammatory bowel disease</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lactic acid</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - analysis</subject><subject>Limit of Detection</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat industry</subject><subject>Meat processing industry</subject><subject>Meat Products - analysis</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota - drug effects</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Production processes</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Rifampin</subject><subject>Rifampin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Shiga toxin</subject><subject>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - metabolism</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Yeasts</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk81u1DAQxyMEoqXwBggsISE4ZLGdxE4uSFVVoFKlShS4Wl5nnLhK7NR2SvfleDa8H626qAfkQ5yZ3_zHM_Zk2WuCF6Tg5NOVm72Vw2JyFhaYlowX1ZPskDQFzRnFxdMH-4PsRQhXGFdFzdjz7KAoGMZliQ-zP5dgg4nmxsQVchr9NkObx9UESNoWeaPlOBllbO4hmBCljeiCVHzjtc7mm5_L3nQSRXebuMm7dk4BHToNqgdvVG8kUm4wCUAwwI2M0KJ-1XqX9KJRaEraYfbblINUa5tUpkXGos67OVlHkHHj3mx6N7oObBJ6mT3Tcgjwavc9yn5-Of1x8i0_v_h6dnJ8nivW0Jjrekl1y3nJgTecNxW0BbSaKAyKaFKXzRLXuqkbimXFy6JiAEvKVc2JZFzL4ih7u9WdBhfErvVB0LIhmDBMaSLOtkTr5JWYvBmlXwknjdgYnO-E9KmyAUSlCOC2LlSNq5I1SmpNGw6E45potmyS1uddtnk5QqvARi-HPdF9jzW96NyN4HVDOC2SwIedgHfXM4QoRhMUDIO04ObtuZuSkXKNvvsHfby6HdXJVICx2qW8ai0qjllFKeU1W5978QiVVgujUemdapPsewEf9wISE-E2dnIOQZxdfv9_9uLXPvv-AduDHGIf3DBH42zYB8stqNJrDB70fZMJFusxu-uGWI-Z2I1ZCnvz8ILug-7mqvgLFBQlHQ</recordid><startdate>20210218</startdate><enddate>20210218</enddate><creator>Allison, Abimbola</creator><creator>Fouladkhah, Aliyar Cyrus</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9204-2870</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210218</creationdate><title>Sensitivity of wild-type and rifampicin-resistant O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli to elevated hydrostatic pressure and lactic acid in ground meat and meat homogenate</title><author>Allison, Abimbola ; Fouladkhah, Aliyar Cyrus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f8b2fd7747e797795ed3edf1c0ec1f1849b08f98920a574356eeb27c871a67fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chemical properties</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Decontamination</topic><topic>Decontamination (from gases, chemicals, etc.)</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Food inspection</topic><topic>Foodborne diseases</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Health surveillance</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Hydrostatic Pressure</topic><topic>Inflammatory bowel disease</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lactic acid</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - analysis</topic><topic>Limit of Detection</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat industry</topic><topic>Meat processing industry</topic><topic>Meat Products - analysis</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota - drug effects</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Production processes</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Rifampin</topic><topic>Rifampin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Shiga toxin</topic><topic>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - metabolism</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Yeasts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allison, Abimbola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fouladkhah, Aliyar Cyrus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Science (Gale in Context)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ, Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allison, Abimbola</au><au>Fouladkhah, Aliyar Cyrus</au><au>Venkitanarayanan, Kumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensitivity of wild-type and rifampicin-resistant O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli to elevated hydrostatic pressure and lactic acid in ground meat and meat homogenate</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-02-18</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0246735</spage><pages>e0246735-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Various serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli have been epidemiologically associated with foodborne disease episodes in the United States and around the globe, with E. coli O157: H7 as the dominant serogroup of public health concern. Serogroups other than O157 are currently associated with about 60% of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli related foodborne illness episodes. Current study evaluated sensitivity of the O157 and epidemiologically important non-O157 serogroups of the pathogen to elevated hydrostatic pressure and 1% lactic acid. Pressure intensity of 250 to 650 MPa were applied for 0 to 7 min for inactivation of strain mixtures of wild-type and rifampicin-resistant E. coli O157, as well as O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145 serogroups and ATCC® 43895™ strain in ground meat and 10% meat homogenate. E. coli O157 were reduced (p &lt; 0.05) from 6.86 ± 0.2 to 4.56 ± 0.1 log CFU/g when exposed to pressure of 650 MPa for 7 min. Corresponding reductions (p &lt; 0.05) for non-O157 E. coli were from 6.98 ± 0.3 to 4.72 ± 0.1. The D-values at 650 MPa were 3.71 and 3.47 min for O157 and non-O157 serogroups, respectively. Presence of 1% lactic acid to a great extent augmented (p &lt; 0.05) decontamination efficacy of the treatment in meat homogenate resulting in up to 5.6 and 6.0 log CFU/mL reductions for O157 and non-O157 serogroups, respectively. Among the tested serogroups, the wild-type and rifampicin-resistant phenotypes exhibited (p ≥ 0.05) comparable pressure sensitivity. Thus, these two phenotypes could be used interchangeably in validation studies. Our results also illustrate that, application of elevated hydrostatic pressure could be utilized for assuring safety of ground and non-intact meat products against various serogroups of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli. Addition of 1% lactic acid additionally provided industrially appreciable augmentation in efficacy of the pressure-based treatments.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33600440</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0246735</doi><tpages>e0246735</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9204-2870</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e0246735
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2491016022
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central
subjects Acids
Agriculture
Antiinfectives and antibacterials
Beef
Biology and Life Sciences
Chemical properties
Control
Decontamination
Decontamination (from gases, chemicals, etc.)
Disease control
Disease prevention
Drug Resistance, Bacterial - drug effects
E coli
Epidemics
Escherichia coli
Experiments
Food chains
Food inspection
Foodborne diseases
Health aspects
Health risk assessment
Health surveillance
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Hydrostatic Pressure
Inflammatory bowel disease
Inspection
Laboratories
Lactic acid
Lactic Acid - analysis
Limit of Detection
Manufacturing
Meat
Meat industry
Meat processing industry
Meat Products - analysis
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Microbiology
Microbiota
Microbiota - drug effects
Pathogens
Phenotype
Physical Sciences
Physiological aspects
Prevention
Production processes
Public health
Rifampin
Rifampin - pharmacology
Risk factors
Shiga toxin
Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - drug effects
Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - metabolism
Temperature
Toxins
Validation studies
Yeasts
title Sensitivity of wild-type and rifampicin-resistant O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli to elevated hydrostatic pressure and lactic acid in ground meat and meat homogenate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T20%3A27%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensitivity%20of%20wild-type%20and%20rifampicin-resistant%20O157%20and%20non-O157%20Shiga%20toxin-producing%20Escherichia%20coli%20to%20elevated%20hydrostatic%20pressure%20and%20lactic%20acid%20in%20ground%20meat%20and%20meat%20homogenate&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Allison,%20Abimbola&rft.date=2021-02-18&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0246735&rft.pages=e0246735-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0246735&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA652227869%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f8b2fd7747e797795ed3edf1c0ec1f1849b08f98920a574356eeb27c871a67fa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491016022&rft_id=info:pmid/33600440&rft_galeid=A652227869&rfr_iscdi=true