"Am I representative (of my age)? No, I'm not"-Attitudes to technologies and technology development differ but unite individuals across rather than within generations

• Published in: PloS one 2021-04, Vol.16 (4), p.e0250425-e0250425
• Main Authors: Fristedt, Sofi, Svärdh, Samantha, Löfqvist, Charlotte, Schmidt, Steven M, Iwarsson, Susanne
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age; Aging; Annan hälsovetenskap; Artificial intelligence; Attitudes; Biology and Life Sciences; Demographic aspects; Digital literacy; Digital technology; Editing; Engineering and Technology; Focus groups; Funding; Generations; Health aspects; Health risks; Health Sciences; Hälsovetenskap; Medical and Health Sciences; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Older people; Other Health Sciences; People and Places; Psychological aspects; Research and Analysis Methods; Reviews; Social Sciences; Technology; Technology Acceptance Model; Technology adoption
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250425

While a broad spectrum of technologies is integrated in everyday life and routines, most research on ageing, health and technology has focused on attitudes toward and adoption of digital technologies including e-health, or home based monitoring systems. The aim of this study was to explore differences and similarities in attitudes and experiences with different types of technologies and development within and between three generations. We applied a qualitative, descriptive design and recruited a purposeful sample of participants from three generations (30-39, 50-59, 70-79 year old). The 25 participants took part in 3 x 2 focus groups. Forming four categories, the findings show that technologies enable as well as complicate everyday life. Participants expressed trust as well as uncertainty about risks when using technology and stated that use of digital services is required while support is limited. They identified that technology development is inevitable but not always in the service of users. In conclusion, experiences of and attitudes towards technologies and technology development are not limited to generation; perspectives sometimes unite individuals across rather than within generations. Thus future technologies and technology development, as well as services and policies aiming to support the use of said technologies should consider individual user perspectives including needs, desires, beliefs or goals neglected in the existing technology models, and involve users beyond generations defined by chronological age. Such strategies are likely to be more successful in supporting development of technologies usable for all.