Latent leprosy infection identified by dual RLEP and anti-PGL-I positivity: Implications for new control strategies

• Published in: PloS one 2021-05, Vol.16 (5), p.e0251631-e0251631
• Main Authors: da Silva, Moises Batista, Li, Wei, Bouth, Raquel Carvalho, Gobbo, Angélica Rita, Messias, Ana Caroline Cunha, Moraes, Tania Mara Pires, Jorge, Erika Vanessa Oliveira, Barreto, Josafá Gonçalves, Filho, Fred Bernardes, Conde, Guilherme Augusto Barros, Frade, Marco Andrey Cipriani, Salgado, Claudio Guedes, Spencer, John Stewart
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Asymptomatic; Biology and Life Sciences; Cities; Control; Dermatology; Diagnosis; Disabilities; Disease; Earth Sciences; Editing; Epidemiology; Genetic aspects; Health care; Health risks; Immunoenzyme technique; Immunology; Information systems; Internal medicine; Laboratories; Laboratory tests; Leprosy; Medical personnel; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Methodology; Microbiology; Mycobacterium leprae; Nervous system; People and places; Peripheral nerves; Polymerase chain reaction; Public health; Research and Analysis Methods; Reviews; Sensitivity analysis; Social Sciences
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251631

The number of new cases of leprosy reported worldwide has remained essentially unchanged for the last decade despite continued global use of free multidrug therapy (MDT) provided to any diagnosed leprosy patient. In order to more effectively interrupt the chain of transmission, new strategies will be required to detect those with latent disease who contribute to furthering transmission. To improve the ability to diagnose leprosy earlier in asymptomatic infected individuals, we examined the combined use of two well-known biomarkers of M. leprae infection, namely the presence of M. leprae DNA by PCR from earlobe slit skin smears (SSS) and positive antibody titers to the M. leprae-specific antigen, Phenolic Glycolipid I (anti-PGL-I) from leprosy patients and household contacts living in seven hyperendemic cities in the northern state of Pará, Brazilian Amazon. Combining both tests increased sensitivity, specificity and accuracy over either test alone. A total of 466 individuals were evaluated, including 87 newly diagnosed leprosy patients, 52 post-treated patients, 296 household contacts and 31 healthy endemic controls. The highest frequency of double positives (PGL-I+/RLEP+) were detected in the new case group (40/87, 46%) with lower numbers for treated (12/52, 23.1%), household contacts (46/296, 15.5%) and healthy endemic controls (0/31, 0%). The frequencies in these groups were reversed for double negatives (PGL-I-/RLEP-) for new cases (6/87, 6.9%), treated leprosy cases (15/52, 28.8%) and the highest in household contacts (108/296, 36.5%) and healthy endemic controls (24/31, 77.4%). The data strongly suggest that household contacts that are double positive have latent disease, are likely contributing to shedding and transmission of disease to their close contacts and are at the highest risk of progressing to clinical disease. Proposed strategies to reduce leprosy transmission in highly endemic areas may include chemoprophylactic treatment of this group of individuals to stop the spread of bacilli to eventually lower new case detection rates in these areas.