Circulating neprilysin hypothesis: A new opportunity for sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction?

• Published in: PloS one 2021-05, Vol.16 (5), p.e0249674-e0249674
• Main Authors: Lupón, Josep, Santiago-Vacas, Evelyn, Cediel, Germán, Codina, Pau, Domingo, Mar, Revuelta-López, Elena, Zamora, Elisabet, Spitaleri, Giosafat, Santesmases, Javier, Núñez, Julio, Bayes-Genis, Antoni
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Angiotensin; Aorta; Bayesian analysis; Biology and Life Sciences; Biomarkers; Cardiology; Cardiovascular diseases; Cerebral infarction; Complications; Complications and side effects; Congestive heart failure; Data analysis; Death; Dissection; Drug therapy; Editing; Ejection fraction; Family physicians; Health risks; Heart attacks; Heart failure; Hemodynamics; Hospitalization; Ischemia; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Methodology; Mortality; Myocardial infarction; Neprilysin; Patient outcomes; Patients; Peptides; Regeneration; Risk analysis; Risk factors; Risk management; Symptom management; Valsartan; Ventricle
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249674

Circulating Neprilysin (sNEP) has emerged as a potential prognostic biomarker in heart failure (HF). In PARAGON-HF benefit of sacubitril/valsartan was only observed in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤57%. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of sNEP in outpatients with HF and LVEF >57%, in comparison with patients with LVEF ≤57%. Consecutive HF outpatients were included from May-2006 to February-2016. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization and the main secondary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. For the later competing risk methods were used. sNEP was measured in 1428 patients (age 67.7±12.7, 70.3% men, LVEF 35.8% ±14), 144 of which had a LVEF >57%. sNEP levels did not significantly differ between LVEF groups (p = 0.31). During a mean follow-up of 6±3.9 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 979 patients and the secondary composite endpoint in 714 (in 111 and 84 of the 144 patients with LVEF >57%, respectively). sNEP was significantly associated with both composite endpoints. Age- and sex- adjusted Cox regression analyses showed higher hazard ratios for sNEP in patients with LVEF >57%, both for the primary (HR 1.37 [1.16-1.61] vs. 1.04 [0.97-1.11]) and the secondary (HR 1.38 [1.21-1.55] vs. 1.11 [1.04-1.18]) composite endpoints. sNEP prognostic value in patients with HF and LVEF >57% outperforms that observed in patients with lower LVEF. Precision medicine using sNEP may identify HF patients with preserved LVEF that may benefit from treatment with sacubitril/valsartan.