Comprehensive comparison of Apple Watch and Fitbit monitors in a free-living setting

• Published in: PloS one 2021-05, Vol.16 (5), p.e0251975-e0251975
• Main Authors: Bai, Yang, Tompkins, Connie, Gell, Nancy, Dione, Dakota, Zhang, Tao, Byun, Wonwoo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Apples; Biology and Life Sciences; Blood pressure; Cardiovascular disease; Clinical trials; Clocks and watches; Data collection; Engineering and Technology; Evaluation; Exercise; Fruits; Goal setting; Heart rate; Intervention; Kinesiology; Medicine and Health Sciences; Monitors; Physical fitness; Rehabilitation; Sedentary behavior; Smartphones; Smartwatches; Social Sciences; Wrist watches
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251975

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of three consumer-based activity monitors, Fitbit Charge 2, Fitbit Alta, and the Apple Watch 2, all worn on the wrist, in estimating step counts, moderate-to-vigorous minutes (MVPA), and heart rate in a free-living setting. Forty-eight participants (31 females, 17 males; ages 18-59) were asked to wear the three consumer-based monitors mentioned above on the wrist, concurrently with a Yamax pedometer as the criterion for step count, an ActiGraph GT3X+ (ActiGraph) for MVPA, and a Polar H7 chest strap for heart rate. Participants wore the monitors for a 24-hour free-living condition without changing their usual active routine. MVPA was calculated in bouts of [greater than or equal to]10 minutes. Pearson correlation, mean absolute percent error (MAPE), and equivalence testing were used to evaluate the measurement agreement. The average step counts recorded for each device were as follows: 11,734 (Charge2), 11,922 (Alta), 11,550 (Apple2), and 10,906 (Yamax). The correlations in steps for the above monitors ranged from 0.84 to 0.95 and MAPE ranged from 17.1% to 35.5%. For MVPA minutes, the average were 76.3 (Charge2), 63.3 (Alta), 49.5 (Apple2), and 47.8 (ActiGraph) minutes accumulated in bouts of 10 or greater minutes. The correlation from MVPA estimation for above monitors were 0.77, 0.91, and 0.66. MAPE from MVPA estimation ranged from 44.7% to 55.4% compared to ActiGraph. For heart rate, correlation for Charge2 and Apple2 was higher for sedentary behavior and lower for MVPA. The MAPE ranged from 4% to 16%. All three consumer monitors estimated step counts fairly accurately, and both the Charge2 and Apple2 reported reasonable heart rate estimation. However, all monitors substantially underestimated MVPA in free-living settings.