Do oral contraceptives affect young women’s memory? Dopamine-dependent working memory is influenced by COMT genotype, but not time of pill ingestion

• Published in: PloS one 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e0252807
• Main Authors: Gravelsins, Laura, Duncan, Katherine, Einstein, Gillian
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biology and Life Sciences; Birth control; Cognition; Cognition & reasoning; Complications and side effects; Contraception; Contraceptives; Dopamine; Editing; Endometriosis; Evaluation; Genotypes; Hormones; Ingestion; Medical imaging; Medicine and Health Sciences; Memory; Menstrual cycle; Methodology; Oral contraceptives; Physical Sciences; Polycystic ovary syndrome; Psychological aspects; Psychology; Public health; Reviews; Short term memory; Visualization; Womens health; Young women
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252807

Despite the widespread use of oral contraceptives (OCs), and the well-documented influence of estrogens, notably 17[beta]-estradiol (E2), on cognition, research relating OCs to working memory is limited and mixed. Two factors may contribute to these mixed findings: 1) pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives, which drive fluctuations in synthetic hormone levels; and 2) genetic polymorphisms related to dopamine degradation and working memory, which interact with E2. This research investigated whether the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives, in concert with the single nucleotide polymorphism (Val.sup.158 Met; rs4680) of the catechol-o-methyltransferase gene (COMT), influence working memory performance. University-age women taking and not taking OCs were tested for working memory and genotyped for COMT. If they were not taking OCs (n = 62), sessions occurred in the early follicular (low E2) and late follicular (high E2) phase. If they were taking OCs (n = 52), sessions occurred 1-2 hours after (high ethinyl estradiol, EE) and ~24 hours after (low EE) pill ingestion. Working memory was tested using the N-back, AX-CPT, Digit Span, and Digit Ordering Tasks. Data were analyzed using multilevel models with estrogen condition, COMT, and group as predictors, controlling for mood and practice effects. For women taking OCs, time of pill ingestion did not influence performance. However, the subgroup with COMT val/val (low dopamine) were less accurate on 2-back lure trials than those with COMT met/met (high dopamine). For women not taking OCs, cycle phase moderated COMT's influence on lure accuracy. When compared, women taking OCs had higher AX-CPT proactive control indices than those not taking OCs. These findings suggest that oral contraceptives are not detrimental for young women's working memory and that they may increase proactive control. The more pronounced effects of COMT in women taking OCs suggests that, in women taking OCs, suppressed endogenous E2-not fluctuating EE levels-may be more relevant for working memory. Future studies are needed to differentiate effects of endogenous versus synthetic estrogens on working memory.