Balancing typological and dimensional approaches: Assessment of adult attachment styles with Factor Mixture Analysis

Many studies show the importance of adult attachment styles and their impact on social and emotional adaptation in adulthood. However, there is no agreement about whether attachment should be regarded as typological or dimensional, and some authors have proposed reconciling both options, so that adu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0254342-e0254342
Main Authors: Morales-Vives, Fabia, Ferré-Rey, Gisela, Ferrando, Pere J, Camps, Misericòrdia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adults
Anxiety
Attachment
Attachment behavior
Biology and Life Sciences
Caregivers
College students
Conflict resolution
Emotions
Identification and classification
Intimacy
People and Places
Principal components analysis
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
Research and Analysis Methods
Self esteem
Self sufficiency
Social Sciences
Stability analysis
Structural models
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Many studies show the importance of adult attachment styles and their impact on social and emotional adaptation in adulthood. However, there is no agreement about whether attachment should be regarded as typological or dimensional, and some authors have proposed reconciling both options, so that adult attachment styles can be assessed more accurately and realistically. In this study we have adopted this comprehensive view and used Factor Mixture Analysis, the most appropriate model for assessing this mixture view. More specifically, we attempted to determine the nature and types (if any) of attachment styles that can be assessed with the Adult Attachment Questionnaire (CAA), using this mixture view. A total of 515 adults from Spain took part, with ages between 18 and 56 years old. In addition to the CAA questionnaire, they completed the Parental Bonding Instrument and the emotional stability subscale of the Overall Personality Assessment Scale. On the basis of the CAA scores, the results show that only two profiles–insecure attachment and normal-range–can be univocally differentiated. Furthermore, the results of a full multiple-group structural model show that each of these profiles has a different pattern of validity relations with the external variables maternal care, maternal overprotection and emotional stability. These differential validity results reinforce the general hypothesis that two differentiated clusters of individuals can be distinguished on the basis of the responses to the CAA items.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0254342