Impact of sex on use of low tidal volume ventilation in invasively ventilated ICU patients—A mediation analysis using two observational cohorts

• Published in: PloS one 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0253933-e0253933
• Main Authors: Swart, Pien, Deliberato, Rodrigo Octavio, Johnson, Alistair E. W, Pollard, Tom J, Bulgarelli, Lucas, Pelosi, Paolo, de Abreu, Marcelo Gama, Schultz, Marcus J, Neto, Ary Serpa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Artificial respiration; Biology and Life Sciences; Body height; Body weight; Care and treatment; Collaboration; Critical care; Datasets; Demographic aspects; Einstein, Albert (1879-1955); Engineering; Females; Health risks; Hospital patients; Hospitals; Intensive care; Laboratories; Males; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Ostomy; Patients; Physiology; Research and Analysis Methods; Sepsis; Sex; Ventilation; Ventilators
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253933

Studies in patients receiving invasive ventilation show important differences in use of low tidal volume (V.sub.T) ventilation (LTVV) between females and males. The aims of this study were to describe temporal changes in V.sub.T and to determine what factors drive the sex difference in use of LTVV. This is a posthoc analysis of 2 large longitudinal projects in 59 ICUs in the United States, the 'Medical information Mart for Intensive Care III' (MIMIC III) and the 'eICU Collaborative Research DataBase'. The proportion of patients under LTVV (median V.sub.T < 8 ml/kg PBW), was the primary outcome. Mediation analysis, a method to dissect total effect into direct and indirect effects, was used to understand which factors drive the sex difference. We included 3614 (44%) females and 4593 (56%) males. Median V.sub.T declined over the years, but with a persistent difference between females (from median 10.2 (9.1 to 11.4) to 8.2 (7.5 to 9.1) ml/kg PBW) vs. males (from median 9.2 [IQR 8.2 to 10.1] to 7.3 [IQR 6.6 to 8.0] ml/kg PBW) (P < .001). In females versus males, use of LTVV increased from 5 to 50% versus from 12 to 78% (difference, -27% [-29% to -25%]; P < .001). The sex difference was mainly driven by patients' body height and actual body weight (adjusted average causal mediation effect, -30% [-33% to -27%]; P < .001, and 4 [3% to 4%]; P < .001). While LTVV is increasingly used in females and males, females continue to receive LTVV less often than males. The sex difference is mainly driven by patients' body height and actual body weight, and not necessarily by sex. Use of LTVV in females could improve by paying more attention to a correct calculation of V.sub.T, i.e., using the correct body height.