Loading…
"Withstanding ambivalence is of particular importance"-Controversies among experts on dealing with desire to die in palliative care
In order to investigate controversies surrounding the desire to die phenomenon in palliative care by analyzing expert opinions on the topic, we carried out a secondary qualitative data analysis of free text comments collected during a Delphi survey that was designed to develop a conversation aid for...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0257382 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-eadd11ee8757930d444d16a104532454ff05b9e634758eb9a0b4c6d1202c8bbc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-eadd11ee8757930d444d16a104532454ff05b9e634758eb9a0b4c6d1202c8bbc3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e0257382 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Kremeike, Kerstin Dojan, Thomas Rosendahl, Carolin Jünger, Saskia Romotzky, Vanessa Boström, Kathleen Frerich, Gerrit Voltz, Raymond |
description | In order to investigate controversies surrounding the desire to die phenomenon in palliative care by analyzing expert opinions on the topic, we carried out a secondary qualitative data analysis of free text comments collected during a Delphi survey that was designed to develop a conversation aid for dealing with desire to die in everyday clinical practice. Between 01/2018 and 03/2018, a two-round Delphi survey was carried out with national (German) and international palliative care experts. Free text comments were reinvestigated to identify controversies surrounding the desire to die phenomenon. An additional in-depth analysis focused on statements expressing attitudes towards proactively addressing (potential) desires to die. Within the Delphi survey, 103 of 149 multi-professional participants (almost all of them with practical and only six with exclusively theoretical expertise in palliative care) generated 444 free text comments. Thereof, we identified three main categories related to dealing with desire to die: "outer framework", "extended care system" and "health-professional-patient-relationship". Ambivalences, taboos and uncertainties surrounding desire to die in palliative care became apparent. Experts are divided concerning the practice of proactively addressing desire to die. Even if these conversations-especially the proactive approach-are also viewed critically, we conclude that open-ended and respectful communication about desire to die between health professionals and patients can be understood as an eligible intervention in palliative care. Proactively addressing the topic is a possible way to open up such conversations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0257382 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2576319289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A676619592</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6ebf3f757724495981c869db88c83829</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A676619592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-eadd11ee8757930d444d16a104532454ff05b9e634758eb9a0b4c6d1202c8bbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk0tv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxBERUKwmCF-xHE2SNWIx0iVKvFcWo5zM-PKE6d2MpQ1f5w7nbSaoC5QFomd7xzb5_omyXOSzQkryLtLP4RWu3nnW5hnNC-YpA-SY1IyOhM0Yw8Pvo-SJzFeZlnOpBCPkyPG87yUVB4nf05_2n4de93Wtl2lelPZrXbQGkhtTH2Tdjr01gxOh9RuOh-QNHA6W_i2D34LIVqIKPMohusOQo-qNq1Bu53fLzTHQbQB0t6ntUXbFj2ds7q3W0iNDvA0edRoF-HZ-D5Jvn_88G3xeXZ-8Wm5ODufGVHSfga6rgkBkEVelCyrOec1EZpkPGeU57xpsrwqQTBe5BKqUmcVN6ImNKNGVpVhJ8nLvW_nfFRjflFhdIKRksoSieWeqL2-VF2wGx1-K6-tupnwYaVu4nCgBFQNa3ArBeW8xDSJkaKsKymNxErsvN6Pqw3VBmoDGJh2E9Ppn9au1cpvleSCFiRDgzejQfBXA8RebWw04JxuwQ_7fYucCEEQffUPev_pRmqFFVa2bTyua3am6kygF8FjUKTm91D41LCxBi9bY3F-Ing7ESDTw3W_0kOMavn1y_-zFz-m7OsDdo03Ci-qd0NvfRunIN-DJvgYAzR3IZNM7XrlNg216xU19grKXhwW6E502xzsL9n-D-8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576319289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"Withstanding ambivalence is of particular importance"-Controversies among experts on dealing with desire to die in palliative care</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Kremeike, Kerstin ; Dojan, Thomas ; Rosendahl, Carolin ; Jünger, Saskia ; Romotzky, Vanessa ; Boström, Kathleen ; Frerich, Gerrit ; Voltz, Raymond</creator><contributor>Frey, Rosemary</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kremeike, Kerstin ; Dojan, Thomas ; Rosendahl, Carolin ; Jünger, Saskia ; Romotzky, Vanessa ; Boström, Kathleen ; Frerich, Gerrit ; Voltz, Raymond ; Frey, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><description>In order to investigate controversies surrounding the desire to die phenomenon in palliative care by analyzing expert opinions on the topic, we carried out a secondary qualitative data analysis of free text comments collected during a Delphi survey that was designed to develop a conversation aid for dealing with desire to die in everyday clinical practice. Between 01/2018 and 03/2018, a two-round Delphi survey was carried out with national (German) and international palliative care experts. Free text comments were reinvestigated to identify controversies surrounding the desire to die phenomenon. An additional in-depth analysis focused on statements expressing attitudes towards proactively addressing (potential) desires to die. Within the Delphi survey, 103 of 149 multi-professional participants (almost all of them with practical and only six with exclusively theoretical expertise in palliative care) generated 444 free text comments. Thereof, we identified three main categories related to dealing with desire to die: "outer framework", "extended care system" and "health-professional-patient-relationship". Ambivalences, taboos and uncertainties surrounding desire to die in palliative care became apparent. Experts are divided concerning the practice of proactively addressing desire to die. Even if these conversations-especially the proactive approach-are also viewed critically, we conclude that open-ended and respectful communication about desire to die between health professionals and patients can be understood as an eligible intervention in palliative care. Proactively addressing the topic is a possible way to open up such conversations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257382</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34559828</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude to Death ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Communication ; Criminal investigations ; Data analysis ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Death ; Death & dying ; Delphi Technique ; Evaluation ; Female ; Germany ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Information management ; International Cooperation ; Male ; Medical care ; Medical personnel ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Palliation ; Palliative care ; Palliative Care - methods ; Palliative Care - trends ; Palliative treatment ; Patients ; Polls & surveys ; Professional-Patient Relations ; Professionals ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative Research ; Quality management ; Social Sciences ; Suicides & suicide attempts ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0257382</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Kremeike et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Kremeike et al 2021 Kremeike et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-eadd11ee8757930d444d16a104532454ff05b9e634758eb9a0b4c6d1202c8bbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-eadd11ee8757930d444d16a104532454ff05b9e634758eb9a0b4c6d1202c8bbc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4316-2379</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2576319289/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2576319289?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25751,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,53789,53791,74896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Frey, Rosemary</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kremeike, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dojan, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosendahl, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jünger, Saskia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romotzky, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boström, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frerich, Gerrit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voltz, Raymond</creatorcontrib><title>"Withstanding ambivalence is of particular importance"-Controversies among experts on dealing with desire to die in palliative care</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In order to investigate controversies surrounding the desire to die phenomenon in palliative care by analyzing expert opinions on the topic, we carried out a secondary qualitative data analysis of free text comments collected during a Delphi survey that was designed to develop a conversation aid for dealing with desire to die in everyday clinical practice. Between 01/2018 and 03/2018, a two-round Delphi survey was carried out with national (German) and international palliative care experts. Free text comments were reinvestigated to identify controversies surrounding the desire to die phenomenon. An additional in-depth analysis focused on statements expressing attitudes towards proactively addressing (potential) desires to die. Within the Delphi survey, 103 of 149 multi-professional participants (almost all of them with practical and only six with exclusively theoretical expertise in palliative care) generated 444 free text comments. Thereof, we identified three main categories related to dealing with desire to die: "outer framework", "extended care system" and "health-professional-patient-relationship". Ambivalences, taboos and uncertainties surrounding desire to die in palliative care became apparent. Experts are divided concerning the practice of proactively addressing desire to die. Even if these conversations-especially the proactive approach-are also viewed critically, we conclude that open-ended and respectful communication about desire to die between health professionals and patients can be understood as an eligible intervention in palliative care. Proactively addressing the topic is a possible way to open up such conversations.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude to Death</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Criminal investigations</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Death & dying</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Palliation</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Palliative Care - methods</subject><subject>Palliative Care - trends</subject><subject>Palliative treatment</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Suicides & suicide attempts</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk0tv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxBERUKwmCF-xHE2SNWIx0iVKvFcWo5zM-PKE6d2MpQ1f5w7nbSaoC5QFomd7xzb5_omyXOSzQkryLtLP4RWu3nnW5hnNC-YpA-SY1IyOhM0Yw8Pvo-SJzFeZlnOpBCPkyPG87yUVB4nf05_2n4de93Wtl2lelPZrXbQGkhtTH2Tdjr01gxOh9RuOh-QNHA6W_i2D34LIVqIKPMohusOQo-qNq1Bu53fLzTHQbQB0t6ntUXbFj2ds7q3W0iNDvA0edRoF-HZ-D5Jvn_88G3xeXZ-8Wm5ODufGVHSfga6rgkBkEVelCyrOec1EZpkPGeU57xpsrwqQTBe5BKqUmcVN6ImNKNGVpVhJ8nLvW_nfFRjflFhdIKRksoSieWeqL2-VF2wGx1-K6-tupnwYaVu4nCgBFQNa3ArBeW8xDSJkaKsKymNxErsvN6Pqw3VBmoDGJh2E9Ppn9au1cpvleSCFiRDgzejQfBXA8RebWw04JxuwQ_7fYucCEEQffUPev_pRmqFFVa2bTyua3am6kygF8FjUKTm91D41LCxBi9bY3F-Ing7ESDTw3W_0kOMavn1y_-zFz-m7OsDdo03Ci-qd0NvfRunIN-DJvgYAzR3IZNM7XrlNg216xU19grKXhwW6E502xzsL9n-D-8</recordid><startdate>20210924</startdate><enddate>20210924</enddate><creator>Kremeike, Kerstin</creator><creator>Dojan, Thomas</creator><creator>Rosendahl, Carolin</creator><creator>Jünger, Saskia</creator><creator>Romotzky, Vanessa</creator><creator>Boström, Kathleen</creator><creator>Frerich, Gerrit</creator><creator>Voltz, Raymond</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4316-2379</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210924</creationdate><title>"Withstanding ambivalence is of particular importance"-Controversies among experts on dealing with desire to die in palliative care</title><author>Kremeike, Kerstin ; Dojan, Thomas ; Rosendahl, Carolin ; Jünger, Saskia ; Romotzky, Vanessa ; Boström, Kathleen ; Frerich, Gerrit ; Voltz, Raymond</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-eadd11ee8757930d444d16a104532454ff05b9e634758eb9a0b4c6d1202c8bbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude to Death</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Criminal investigations</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Death & dying</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Palliation</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Palliative Care - methods</topic><topic>Palliative Care - trends</topic><topic>Palliative treatment</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Suicides & suicide attempts</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kremeike, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dojan, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosendahl, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jünger, Saskia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romotzky, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boström, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frerich, Gerrit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voltz, Raymond</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kremeike, Kerstin</au><au>Dojan, Thomas</au><au>Rosendahl, Carolin</au><au>Jünger, Saskia</au><au>Romotzky, Vanessa</au><au>Boström, Kathleen</au><au>Frerich, Gerrit</au><au>Voltz, Raymond</au><au>Frey, Rosemary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"Withstanding ambivalence is of particular importance"-Controversies among experts on dealing with desire to die in palliative care</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-09-24</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0257382</spage><pages>e0257382-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In order to investigate controversies surrounding the desire to die phenomenon in palliative care by analyzing expert opinions on the topic, we carried out a secondary qualitative data analysis of free text comments collected during a Delphi survey that was designed to develop a conversation aid for dealing with desire to die in everyday clinical practice. Between 01/2018 and 03/2018, a two-round Delphi survey was carried out with national (German) and international palliative care experts. Free text comments were reinvestigated to identify controversies surrounding the desire to die phenomenon. An additional in-depth analysis focused on statements expressing attitudes towards proactively addressing (potential) desires to die. Within the Delphi survey, 103 of 149 multi-professional participants (almost all of them with practical and only six with exclusively theoretical expertise in palliative care) generated 444 free text comments. Thereof, we identified three main categories related to dealing with desire to die: "outer framework", "extended care system" and "health-professional-patient-relationship". Ambivalences, taboos and uncertainties surrounding desire to die in palliative care became apparent. Experts are divided concerning the practice of proactively addressing desire to die. Even if these conversations-especially the proactive approach-are also viewed critically, we conclude that open-ended and respectful communication about desire to die between health professionals and patients can be understood as an eligible intervention in palliative care. Proactively addressing the topic is a possible way to open up such conversations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34559828</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0257382</doi><tpages>e0257382</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4316-2379</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2021-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e0257382 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2576319289 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Adult Attitude to Death Biology and Life Sciences Communication Criminal investigations Data analysis Data Interpretation, Statistical Death Death & dying Delphi Technique Evaluation Female Germany Health Personnel Humans Information management International Cooperation Male Medical care Medical personnel Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Middle Aged Palliation Palliative care Palliative Care - methods Palliative Care - trends Palliative treatment Patients Polls & surveys Professional-Patient Relations Professionals Qualitative analysis Qualitative Research Quality management Social Sciences Suicides & suicide attempts Surveys and Questionnaires Uncertainty |
title | "Withstanding ambivalence is of particular importance"-Controversies among experts on dealing with desire to die in palliative care |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T10%3A32%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Withstanding%20ambivalence%20is%20of%20particular%20importance%22-Controversies%20among%20experts%20on%20dealing%20with%20desire%20to%20die%20in%20palliative%20care&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Kremeike,%20Kerstin&rft.date=2021-09-24&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0257382&rft.pages=e0257382-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0257382&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA676619592%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-eadd11ee8757930d444d16a104532454ff05b9e634758eb9a0b4c6d1202c8bbc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576319289&rft_id=info:pmid/34559828&rft_galeid=A676619592&rfr_iscdi=true |