A 3-year evaluation of preclinicaltrials.eu reveals room for improvement in preregistration of animal studies

In 2018, the first registry dedicated to preregistration of animal study protocols was launched. Despite international support, the overall number of (pre)registered protocols is still low, illustrating the need for pushing the preregistration agenda among researchers and policymakers.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS biology 2021-09, Vol.19 (9), p.e3001397-e3001397
Main Authors: van der Naald, Mira, Chamuleau, Steven A. J, Menon, Julia M. L, de Leeuw, Wim, de Haan, Judith J, Duncker, Dirk J, Wever, Kimberley E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accountability
Bias
Biology and Life Sciences
Clinical trials
Funding
Hypotheses
Intellectual property
Laboratory animals
Medical research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
R&D
Registration
Research & development
Research and Analysis Methods
Researchers
Science Policy
Social Sciences
Transparency
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In 2018, the first registry dedicated to preregistration of animal study protocols was launched. Despite international support, the overall number of (pre)registered protocols is still low, illustrating the need for pushing the preregistration agenda among researchers and policymakers.
ISSN:1545-7885
1544-9173
1545-7885
DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001397