Loading…

The limited screening accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 in detecting depression among perinatal women in Italy

The PHQ-2 was recently recommended by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement as a form of initial perinatal screening, followed by the EPDS only for women with positive PHQ-2 score. However, the accuracy of the PHQ-2 in perinatal clinical practice has been barely researched, to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2021-11, Vol.16 (11), p.e0260596-e0260596
Main Authors: Gigantesco, Antonella, Palumbo, Gabriella, Cena, Loredana, Camoni, Laura, Trainini, Alice, Stefana, Alberto, Mirabella, Fiorino
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f2948f630993497830e11b7f164c4ac5882fb027afca8489a7c7877141e0e5e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f2948f630993497830e11b7f164c4ac5882fb027afca8489a7c7877141e0e5e3
container_end_page e0260596
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0260596
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Gigantesco, Antonella
Palumbo, Gabriella
Cena, Loredana
Camoni, Laura
Trainini, Alice
Stefana, Alberto
Mirabella, Fiorino
description The PHQ-2 was recently recommended by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement as a form of initial perinatal screening, followed by the EPDS only for women with positive PHQ-2 score. However, the accuracy of the PHQ-2 in perinatal clinical practice has been barely researched, to date. In the present study, we aim to assess the accuracy of the PHQ-2 against the EPDS in a large sample of perinatal women. A total of 1155 consecutive women attending eleven primary or secondary health care centres throughout Italy completed the EPDS and the PHQ-2 during pregnancy (27-40-weeks) or postpartum (1-13-weeks). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, post-test probabilities and area under the curve (AUC) of the PHQ-2, using a cut-off of ≥ 3, were calculated. During pregnancy, PHQ-2 revealed low sensitivity (39.5%) and PPV (39.4%) but high specificity and NPV (97.5%). In postpartum, it revealed very low sensitivity (32.7%) and moderately high NPV (80.9%), but high specificity (99.3%) and PPV (94.4%). Given the low sensitivity despite the high specificity, the PHQ-2 demonstrated poor accuracy (AUC from 0.66 to 0.68). Initial screening by means of PHQ-2 failed to identify an acceptable number of perinatal women at-risk of depression in Italian clinical practice. The PHQ-2 performance suggested that it has insufficient sensitivity and discriminatory power, and may be inadequate as a screening tool for maternal depression.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0260596
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2604483358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A684187145</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8767c7c9df564e1e86bd90f0c4da4c3b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A684187145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f2948f630993497830e11b7f164c4ac5882fb027afca8489a7c7877141e0e5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKvOM4N0jQBqzRpfFTcWq5z0rpK7GI7QMWfx1mzqUG7QLlwcvyc1zmvz8my5xjNMS3xu63rvVXtfOcszBHhqKj4g-wUV5TMOEH04dH7SfYkhC1CBRWcP85OKBOMFkKcZn-WG8hb05kIdR60B7DGrnOlde-V3ueuyWMiPqtowMb8ElQbN_mXHkI0zlplPMxIbmxeQwQdh9wadh5CSNu56lwK7MAbq6Jq81-uAzvQi_S1f5o9alQb4Nm4nmXLjx-WF5ezq-tPi4vzq5nmFYmzhlRMNJyiqqKsKgVFgPGqbDBnmimdyiDNCpFSNVoJJipV6lKUJWYYEBRAz7KXB9ld64IcbQsyOcaYoMmGRCwORO3UVu686ZTfS6eMvAk4v5bKR6NbkKLkSV5XdVNwBhgEX9UVapBmtWKarpLW-_G0ftVBrZNrXrUT0emONRu5dj-l4KQiFCeBN6OAdz8Gn2Vngoa2VRZcf_hvQRnhJKGv_kHvr26k1ioVYGzj0rl6EJXnXDAsklVFoub3UOmpoTM69VhjUnyS8HaSkJgIv-Na9SHIxbev_89ef5-yr4_YzU3DBdf2Q7-FKcgOoPYuBA_NnckYyWFEbt2Qw4jIcURS2ovjC7pLup0J-hf7gwx1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604483358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The limited screening accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 in detecting depression among perinatal women in Italy</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gigantesco, Antonella ; Palumbo, Gabriella ; Cena, Loredana ; Camoni, Laura ; Trainini, Alice ; Stefana, Alberto ; Mirabella, Fiorino</creator><creatorcontrib>Gigantesco, Antonella ; Palumbo, Gabriella ; Cena, Loredana ; Camoni, Laura ; Trainini, Alice ; Stefana, Alberto ; Mirabella, Fiorino</creatorcontrib><description>The PHQ-2 was recently recommended by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement as a form of initial perinatal screening, followed by the EPDS only for women with positive PHQ-2 score. However, the accuracy of the PHQ-2 in perinatal clinical practice has been barely researched, to date. In the present study, we aim to assess the accuracy of the PHQ-2 against the EPDS in a large sample of perinatal women. A total of 1155 consecutive women attending eleven primary or secondary health care centres throughout Italy completed the EPDS and the PHQ-2 during pregnancy (27-40-weeks) or postpartum (1-13-weeks). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, post-test probabilities and area under the curve (AUC) of the PHQ-2, using a cut-off of ≥ 3, were calculated. During pregnancy, PHQ-2 revealed low sensitivity (39.5%) and PPV (39.4%) but high specificity and NPV (97.5%). In postpartum, it revealed very low sensitivity (32.7%) and moderately high NPV (80.9%), but high specificity (99.3%) and PPV (94.4%). Given the low sensitivity despite the high specificity, the PHQ-2 demonstrated poor accuracy (AUC from 0.66 to 0.68). Initial screening by means of PHQ-2 failed to identify an acceptable number of perinatal women at-risk of depression in Italian clinical practice. The PHQ-2 performance suggested that it has insufficient sensitivity and discriminatory power, and may be inadequate as a screening tool for maternal depression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260596</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34843588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical psychology ; Depression - diagnosis ; Depression - epidemiology ; Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis ; Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology ; Diagnosis ; Evaluation ; Female ; Gynecology ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Health care policy ; Health risks ; Humans ; Intervention ; Italy - epidemiology ; Likelihood ratio ; Major depressive disorder ; Mass Screening ; Maternal health services ; Medical screening ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mental depression ; Mental health ; Mental health screening ; Methods ; Mothers ; Neurosciences ; Observatories ; Obstetrics ; Patient Health Questionnaire ; Pediatrics ; People and places ; Perinatal Care ; Postpartum ; Postpartum depression ; Postpartum Period ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis ; Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology ; Pregnant women ; Prognosis ; Psychological aspects ; Psychologists ; Psychosis ; Questionnaires ; Risk factors ; Sensitivity ; Social Sciences ; Sociodemographics ; Surveys ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-11, Vol.16 (11), p.e0260596-e0260596</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Gigantesco et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Gigantesco et al 2021 Gigantesco et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f2948f630993497830e11b7f164c4ac5882fb027afca8489a7c7877141e0e5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f2948f630993497830e11b7f164c4ac5882fb027afca8489a7c7877141e0e5e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9262-7756 ; 0000-0002-4807-7184</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2604483358/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2604483358?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34843588$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gigantesco, Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cena, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camoni, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trainini, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefana, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirabella, Fiorino</creatorcontrib><title>The limited screening accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 in detecting depression among perinatal women in Italy</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The PHQ-2 was recently recommended by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement as a form of initial perinatal screening, followed by the EPDS only for women with positive PHQ-2 score. However, the accuracy of the PHQ-2 in perinatal clinical practice has been barely researched, to date. In the present study, we aim to assess the accuracy of the PHQ-2 against the EPDS in a large sample of perinatal women. A total of 1155 consecutive women attending eleven primary or secondary health care centres throughout Italy completed the EPDS and the PHQ-2 during pregnancy (27-40-weeks) or postpartum (1-13-weeks). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, post-test probabilities and area under the curve (AUC) of the PHQ-2, using a cut-off of ≥ 3, were calculated. During pregnancy, PHQ-2 revealed low sensitivity (39.5%) and PPV (39.4%) but high specificity and NPV (97.5%). In postpartum, it revealed very low sensitivity (32.7%) and moderately high NPV (80.9%), but high specificity (99.3%) and PPV (94.4%). Given the low sensitivity despite the high specificity, the PHQ-2 demonstrated poor accuracy (AUC from 0.66 to 0.68). Initial screening by means of PHQ-2 failed to identify an acceptable number of perinatal women at-risk of depression in Italian clinical practice. The PHQ-2 performance suggested that it has insufficient sensitivity and discriminatory power, and may be inadequate as a screening tool for maternal depression.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical psychology</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression - epidemiology</subject><subject>Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Italy - epidemiology</subject><subject>Likelihood ratio</subject><subject>Major depressive disorder</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Maternal health services</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental health screening</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Observatories</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Patient Health Questionnaire</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Perinatal Care</subject><subject>Postpartum</subject><subject>Postpartum depression</subject><subject>Postpartum Period</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkJw0eKvOM4N0jQBqzRpfFTcWq5z0rpK7GI7QMWfx1mzqUG7QLlwcvyc1zmvz8my5xjNMS3xu63rvVXtfOcszBHhqKj4g-wUV5TMOEH04dH7SfYkhC1CBRWcP85OKBOMFkKcZn-WG8hb05kIdR60B7DGrnOlde-V3ueuyWMiPqtowMb8ElQbN_mXHkI0zlplPMxIbmxeQwQdh9wadh5CSNu56lwK7MAbq6Jq81-uAzvQi_S1f5o9alQb4Nm4nmXLjx-WF5ezq-tPi4vzq5nmFYmzhlRMNJyiqqKsKgVFgPGqbDBnmimdyiDNCpFSNVoJJipV6lKUJWYYEBRAz7KXB9ld64IcbQsyOcaYoMmGRCwORO3UVu686ZTfS6eMvAk4v5bKR6NbkKLkSV5XdVNwBhgEX9UVapBmtWKarpLW-_G0ftVBrZNrXrUT0emONRu5dj-l4KQiFCeBN6OAdz8Gn2Vngoa2VRZcf_hvQRnhJKGv_kHvr26k1ioVYGzj0rl6EJXnXDAsklVFoub3UOmpoTM69VhjUnyS8HaSkJgIv-Na9SHIxbev_89ef5-yr4_YzU3DBdf2Q7-FKcgOoPYuBA_NnckYyWFEbt2Qw4jIcURS2ovjC7pLup0J-hf7gwx1</recordid><startdate>20211129</startdate><enddate>20211129</enddate><creator>Gigantesco, Antonella</creator><creator>Palumbo, Gabriella</creator><creator>Cena, Loredana</creator><creator>Camoni, Laura</creator><creator>Trainini, Alice</creator><creator>Stefana, Alberto</creator><creator>Mirabella, Fiorino</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-7756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4807-7184</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211129</creationdate><title>The limited screening accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 in detecting depression among perinatal women in Italy</title><author>Gigantesco, Antonella ; Palumbo, Gabriella ; Cena, Loredana ; Camoni, Laura ; Trainini, Alice ; Stefana, Alberto ; Mirabella, Fiorino</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f2948f630993497830e11b7f164c4ac5882fb027afca8489a7c7877141e0e5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical psychology</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression - epidemiology</topic><topic>Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Italy - epidemiology</topic><topic>Likelihood ratio</topic><topic>Major depressive disorder</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Maternal health services</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental health screening</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Observatories</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Patient Health Questionnaire</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Perinatal Care</topic><topic>Postpartum</topic><topic>Postpartum depression</topic><topic>Postpartum Period</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gigantesco, Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cena, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camoni, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trainini, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefana, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirabella, Fiorino</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gigantesco, Antonella</au><au>Palumbo, Gabriella</au><au>Cena, Loredana</au><au>Camoni, Laura</au><au>Trainini, Alice</au><au>Stefana, Alberto</au><au>Mirabella, Fiorino</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The limited screening accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 in detecting depression among perinatal women in Italy</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-11-29</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0260596</spage><epage>e0260596</epage><pages>e0260596-e0260596</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The PHQ-2 was recently recommended by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement as a form of initial perinatal screening, followed by the EPDS only for women with positive PHQ-2 score. However, the accuracy of the PHQ-2 in perinatal clinical practice has been barely researched, to date. In the present study, we aim to assess the accuracy of the PHQ-2 against the EPDS in a large sample of perinatal women. A total of 1155 consecutive women attending eleven primary or secondary health care centres throughout Italy completed the EPDS and the PHQ-2 during pregnancy (27-40-weeks) or postpartum (1-13-weeks). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, post-test probabilities and area under the curve (AUC) of the PHQ-2, using a cut-off of ≥ 3, were calculated. During pregnancy, PHQ-2 revealed low sensitivity (39.5%) and PPV (39.4%) but high specificity and NPV (97.5%). In postpartum, it revealed very low sensitivity (32.7%) and moderately high NPV (80.9%), but high specificity (99.3%) and PPV (94.4%). Given the low sensitivity despite the high specificity, the PHQ-2 demonstrated poor accuracy (AUC from 0.66 to 0.68). Initial screening by means of PHQ-2 failed to identify an acceptable number of perinatal women at-risk of depression in Italian clinical practice. The PHQ-2 performance suggested that it has insufficient sensitivity and discriminatory power, and may be inadequate as a screening tool for maternal depression.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34843588</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0260596</doi><tpages>e0260596</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-7756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4807-7184</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-11, Vol.16 (11), p.e0260596-e0260596
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2604483358
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Accuracy
Adolescent
Adult
Clinical medicine
Clinical psychology
Depression - diagnosis
Depression - epidemiology
Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis
Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology
Diagnosis
Evaluation
Female
Gynecology
Health aspects
Health care
Health care policy
Health risks
Humans
Intervention
Italy - epidemiology
Likelihood ratio
Major depressive disorder
Mass Screening
Maternal health services
Medical screening
Medicine and Health Sciences
Mental depression
Mental health
Mental health screening
Methods
Mothers
Neurosciences
Observatories
Obstetrics
Patient Health Questionnaire
Pediatrics
People and places
Perinatal Care
Postpartum
Postpartum depression
Postpartum Period
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis
Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology
Pregnant women
Prognosis
Psychological aspects
Psychologists
Psychosis
Questionnaires
Risk factors
Sensitivity
Social Sciences
Sociodemographics
Surveys
Womens health
Young Adult
title The limited screening accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 in detecting depression among perinatal women in Italy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A57%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20limited%20screening%20accuracy%20of%20the%20Patient%20Health%20Questionnaire-2%20in%20detecting%20depression%20among%20perinatal%20women%20in%20Italy&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Gigantesco,%20Antonella&rft.date=2021-11-29&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0260596&rft.epage=e0260596&rft.pages=e0260596-e0260596&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0260596&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA684187145%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-f2948f630993497830e11b7f164c4ac5882fb027afca8489a7c7877141e0e5e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604483358&rft_id=info:pmid/34843588&rft_galeid=A684187145&rfr_iscdi=true