Loading…
Predicting dispensing errors in community pharmacies: An application of the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA)
The objective of this study was to use a prospective error analysis method to examine the process of dispensing medication in community pharmacy settings and identify remedial solutions to avoid potential errors, categorising them as strong, intermediate, or weak based on an established patient safe...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e0261672-e0261672 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d95f9b715285405189b1ca2f81511fc452acfba3b8c2dd7882e80fa8932d2dfd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d95f9b715285405189b1ca2f81511fc452acfba3b8c2dd7882e80fa8932d2dfd3 |
container_end_page | e0261672 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e0261672 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Ashour, Ahmed Phipps, Denham L Ashcroft, Darren M |
description | The objective of this study was to use a prospective error analysis method to examine the process of dispensing medication in community pharmacy settings and identify remedial solutions to avoid potential errors, categorising them as strong, intermediate, or weak based on an established patient safety action hierarchy tool.
Focus group discussions and non-participant observations were undertaken to develop a Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA), and subsequent focus group discussions applied the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA) focusing on the task of dispensing medication in community pharmacies. Remedial measures identified through the SHERPA analysis were then categorised as strong, intermediate, or weak based on the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Non-participant observations were conducted at 3 pharmacies, totalling 12 hours, based in England. Additionally, 7 community pharmacists, with experience ranging from 8 to 38 years, participated in a total of 4 focus groups, each lasting between 57 to 85 minutes, with one focus group discussing the HTA and three applying SHERPA. A HTA was produced consisting of 10 sub-tasks, with further levels of sub-tasks within each of them.
Overall, 88 potential errors were identified, with a total of 35 remedial solutions proposed to avoid these errors in practice. Sixteen (46%) of these remedial measures were categorised as weak, 14 (40%) as intermediate and 5 (14%) as strong according to the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Sub-tasks with the most potential errors were identified, which included 'producing medication labels' and 'final checking of medicines'. The most common type of error determined from the SHERPA analysis related to omitting a check during the dispensing process which accounted for 19 potential errors.
This work applies both HTA and SHERPA for the first time to the task of dispensing medication in community pharmacies, detailing the complexity of the task and highlighting potential errors and remedial measures specific to this task. Future research should examine the effectiveness of the proposed remedial solutions to improve patient safety. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0261672 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2616581323</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A688645187</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_81d0935045b14c619603e1a1fd701dda</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A688645187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d95f9b715285405189b1ca2f81511fc452acfba3b8c2dd7882e80fa8932d2dfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99u0zAUxiMEYmPwBggsIaHtoiV2EsfhAqmaCq00aVML3FqO_7SuEjuzE0QfgnfGWdOpQbtAubBz_DvfyfniE0VvYTyFSQ4_7WznDKumjTVyGiMMcY6eReewSNAEozh5frI_i155v4vjLCEYv4zOkrQgKM_xefTnzkmheavNBgjtG2l8v5XOWeeBNoDbuu6Mbveg2TJXM66l_wxmBrCmqTRnrbYGWAXarQTrvW9lHUIcLLqaGTDvZcBKio4_cMwIcCwYXmdN4yzjW3C5XsxXd7Or19ELxSov3wzrRfTj6_z79WJyc_tteT27mXBcoHYiikwVZQ4zRLI0ziApSsgZUgRmECqeZohxVbKkJBwJkROCJIkVI8EOgYQSyUX0_qDbVNbTwUlPexMzAhOUBGJ5IIRlO9o4XTO3p5Zp-hCwbkOZC41WkhIo4iLJ4jQrYcoxLHCcSMigEnkMhWBB68tQrStrKbg0rWPVSHR8YvSWbuwvSnKE0xwFgctBwNn7TvqW1tpzWVXMSNsdvrvIMpQXAf3wD_p0dwO1YaEBbZQNdXkvSmeYEJwGT_NATZ-gwiNkrXm4dkqH-CjhapQQmFb-bjes854u16v_Z29_jtmPJ-xWsqrdelt1_SXyYzA9gNxZ751UjybDmPZTc3SD9lNDh6kJae9Of9Bj0nFMkr97DBMh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2616581323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting dispensing errors in community pharmacies: An application of the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA)</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ashour, Ahmed ; Phipps, Denham L ; Ashcroft, Darren M</creator><contributor>Schneider, Carl Richard</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ashour, Ahmed ; Phipps, Denham L ; Ashcroft, Darren M ; Schneider, Carl Richard</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to use a prospective error analysis method to examine the process of dispensing medication in community pharmacy settings and identify remedial solutions to avoid potential errors, categorising them as strong, intermediate, or weak based on an established patient safety action hierarchy tool.
Focus group discussions and non-participant observations were undertaken to develop a Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA), and subsequent focus group discussions applied the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA) focusing on the task of dispensing medication in community pharmacies. Remedial measures identified through the SHERPA analysis were then categorised as strong, intermediate, or weak based on the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Non-participant observations were conducted at 3 pharmacies, totalling 12 hours, based in England. Additionally, 7 community pharmacists, with experience ranging from 8 to 38 years, participated in a total of 4 focus groups, each lasting between 57 to 85 minutes, with one focus group discussing the HTA and three applying SHERPA. A HTA was produced consisting of 10 sub-tasks, with further levels of sub-tasks within each of them.
Overall, 88 potential errors were identified, with a total of 35 remedial solutions proposed to avoid these errors in practice. Sixteen (46%) of these remedial measures were categorised as weak, 14 (40%) as intermediate and 5 (14%) as strong according to the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Sub-tasks with the most potential errors were identified, which included 'producing medication labels' and 'final checking of medicines'. The most common type of error determined from the SHERPA analysis related to omitting a check during the dispensing process which accounted for 19 potential errors.
This work applies both HTA and SHERPA for the first time to the task of dispensing medication in community pharmacies, detailing the complexity of the task and highlighting potential errors and remedial measures specific to this task. Future research should examine the effectiveness of the proposed remedial solutions to improve patient safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261672</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34982776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Community Pharmacy Services ; Dispensing ; Drug stores ; Drugs ; Drugstores ; Engineering and Technology ; England ; Error analysis ; Error analysis (Mathematics) ; Error reduction ; Focus Groups ; Health risks ; Human error ; Human factors ; Humans ; Management ; Medical errors ; Medication Errors ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Patient Safety ; Pediatrics ; People and Places ; Pharmacists - psychology ; Safety ; Social Sciences ; Task Performance and Analysis</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e0261672-e0261672</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Ashour et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Ashour et al 2022 Ashour et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d95f9b715285405189b1ca2f81511fc452acfba3b8c2dd7882e80fa8932d2dfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d95f9b715285405189b1ca2f81511fc452acfba3b8c2dd7882e80fa8932d2dfd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1645-1810 ; 0000-0003-0857-2890</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2616581323/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2616581323?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34982776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Schneider, Carl Richard</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ashour, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phipps, Denham L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashcroft, Darren M</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting dispensing errors in community pharmacies: An application of the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA)</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to use a prospective error analysis method to examine the process of dispensing medication in community pharmacy settings and identify remedial solutions to avoid potential errors, categorising them as strong, intermediate, or weak based on an established patient safety action hierarchy tool.
Focus group discussions and non-participant observations were undertaken to develop a Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA), and subsequent focus group discussions applied the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA) focusing on the task of dispensing medication in community pharmacies. Remedial measures identified through the SHERPA analysis were then categorised as strong, intermediate, or weak based on the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Non-participant observations were conducted at 3 pharmacies, totalling 12 hours, based in England. Additionally, 7 community pharmacists, with experience ranging from 8 to 38 years, participated in a total of 4 focus groups, each lasting between 57 to 85 minutes, with one focus group discussing the HTA and three applying SHERPA. A HTA was produced consisting of 10 sub-tasks, with further levels of sub-tasks within each of them.
Overall, 88 potential errors were identified, with a total of 35 remedial solutions proposed to avoid these errors in practice. Sixteen (46%) of these remedial measures were categorised as weak, 14 (40%) as intermediate and 5 (14%) as strong according to the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Sub-tasks with the most potential errors were identified, which included 'producing medication labels' and 'final checking of medicines'. The most common type of error determined from the SHERPA analysis related to omitting a check during the dispensing process which accounted for 19 potential errors.
This work applies both HTA and SHERPA for the first time to the task of dispensing medication in community pharmacies, detailing the complexity of the task and highlighting potential errors and remedial measures specific to this task. Future research should examine the effectiveness of the proposed remedial solutions to improve patient safety.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Community Pharmacy Services</subject><subject>Dispensing</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Drugstores</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Error analysis (Mathematics)</subject><subject>Error reduction</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Human error</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical errors</subject><subject>Medication Errors</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Pharmacists - psychology</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99u0zAUxiMEYmPwBggsIaHtoiV2EsfhAqmaCq00aVML3FqO_7SuEjuzE0QfgnfGWdOpQbtAubBz_DvfyfniE0VvYTyFSQ4_7WznDKumjTVyGiMMcY6eReewSNAEozh5frI_i155v4vjLCEYv4zOkrQgKM_xefTnzkmheavNBgjtG2l8v5XOWeeBNoDbuu6Mbveg2TJXM66l_wxmBrCmqTRnrbYGWAXarQTrvW9lHUIcLLqaGTDvZcBKio4_cMwIcCwYXmdN4yzjW3C5XsxXd7Or19ELxSov3wzrRfTj6_z79WJyc_tteT27mXBcoHYiikwVZQ4zRLI0ziApSsgZUgRmECqeZohxVbKkJBwJkROCJIkVI8EOgYQSyUX0_qDbVNbTwUlPexMzAhOUBGJ5IIRlO9o4XTO3p5Zp-hCwbkOZC41WkhIo4iLJ4jQrYcoxLHCcSMigEnkMhWBB68tQrStrKbg0rWPVSHR8YvSWbuwvSnKE0xwFgctBwNn7TvqW1tpzWVXMSNsdvrvIMpQXAf3wD_p0dwO1YaEBbZQNdXkvSmeYEJwGT_NATZ-gwiNkrXm4dkqH-CjhapQQmFb-bjes854u16v_Z29_jtmPJ-xWsqrdelt1_SXyYzA9gNxZ751UjybDmPZTc3SD9lNDh6kJae9Of9Bj0nFMkr97DBMh</recordid><startdate>20220104</startdate><enddate>20220104</enddate><creator>Ashour, Ahmed</creator><creator>Phipps, Denham L</creator><creator>Ashcroft, Darren M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1645-1810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0857-2890</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220104</creationdate><title>Predicting dispensing errors in community pharmacies: An application of the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA)</title><author>Ashour, Ahmed ; Phipps, Denham L ; Ashcroft, Darren M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d95f9b715285405189b1ca2f81511fc452acfba3b8c2dd7882e80fa8932d2dfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Community Pharmacy Services</topic><topic>Dispensing</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Drugstores</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Error analysis (Mathematics)</topic><topic>Error reduction</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Human error</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical errors</topic><topic>Medication Errors</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Pharmacists - psychology</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashour, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phipps, Denham L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashcroft, Darren M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale in Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashour, Ahmed</au><au>Phipps, Denham L</au><au>Ashcroft, Darren M</au><au>Schneider, Carl Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting dispensing errors in community pharmacies: An application of the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA)</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-01-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0261672</spage><epage>e0261672</epage><pages>e0261672-e0261672</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to use a prospective error analysis method to examine the process of dispensing medication in community pharmacy settings and identify remedial solutions to avoid potential errors, categorising them as strong, intermediate, or weak based on an established patient safety action hierarchy tool.
Focus group discussions and non-participant observations were undertaken to develop a Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA), and subsequent focus group discussions applied the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA) focusing on the task of dispensing medication in community pharmacies. Remedial measures identified through the SHERPA analysis were then categorised as strong, intermediate, or weak based on the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Non-participant observations were conducted at 3 pharmacies, totalling 12 hours, based in England. Additionally, 7 community pharmacists, with experience ranging from 8 to 38 years, participated in a total of 4 focus groups, each lasting between 57 to 85 minutes, with one focus group discussing the HTA and three applying SHERPA. A HTA was produced consisting of 10 sub-tasks, with further levels of sub-tasks within each of them.
Overall, 88 potential errors were identified, with a total of 35 remedial solutions proposed to avoid these errors in practice. Sixteen (46%) of these remedial measures were categorised as weak, 14 (40%) as intermediate and 5 (14%) as strong according to the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Sub-tasks with the most potential errors were identified, which included 'producing medication labels' and 'final checking of medicines'. The most common type of error determined from the SHERPA analysis related to omitting a check during the dispensing process which accounted for 19 potential errors.
This work applies both HTA and SHERPA for the first time to the task of dispensing medication in community pharmacies, detailing the complexity of the task and highlighting potential errors and remedial measures specific to this task. Future research should examine the effectiveness of the proposed remedial solutions to improve patient safety.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34982776</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0261672</doi><tpages>e0261672</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1645-1810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0857-2890</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e0261672-e0261672 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2616581323 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biology and Life Sciences Community Pharmacy Services Dispensing Drug stores Drugs Drugstores Engineering and Technology England Error analysis Error analysis (Mathematics) Error reduction Focus Groups Health risks Human error Human factors Humans Management Medical errors Medication Errors Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Patient Safety Pediatrics People and Places Pharmacists - psychology Safety Social Sciences Task Performance and Analysis |
title | Predicting dispensing errors in community pharmacies: An application of the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A36%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20dispensing%20errors%20in%20community%20pharmacies:%20An%20application%20of%20the%20Systematic%20Human%20Error%20Reduction%20and%20Prediction%20Approach%20(SHERPA)&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ashour,%20Ahmed&rft.date=2022-01-04&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0261672&rft.epage=e0261672&rft.pages=e0261672-e0261672&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0261672&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA688645187%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d95f9b715285405189b1ca2f81511fc452acfba3b8c2dd7882e80fa8932d2dfd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2616581323&rft_id=info:pmid/34982776&rft_galeid=A688645187&rfr_iscdi=true |