Loading…

Efficacy versus abundancy: Comparing vaccination schemes

We introduce a novel compartmental model accounting for the effects of vaccine efficacy, deployment rates and timing of initiation of deployment. We simulate different scenarios and initial conditions, and we find that higher abundancy and rate of deployment of low efficacy vaccines lowers the cumul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0267840-e0267840
Main Authors: El Deeb, Omar, Jalloul, Maya
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1062e5111c5b7eca10c1efb390264c626e5b1cdab54ca2fa78eafd56e6c335fd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1062e5111c5b7eca10c1efb390264c626e5b1cdab54ca2fa78eafd56e6c335fd3
container_end_page e0267840
container_issue 5
container_start_page e0267840
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator El Deeb, Omar
Jalloul, Maya
description We introduce a novel compartmental model accounting for the effects of vaccine efficacy, deployment rates and timing of initiation of deployment. We simulate different scenarios and initial conditions, and we find that higher abundancy and rate of deployment of low efficacy vaccines lowers the cumulative number of deaths in comparison to slower deployment of high efficacy vaccines. We also forecast that, at the same daily deployment rate, the earlier introduction of vaccination schemes with lower efficacy would also lower the number of deaths with respect to a delayed introduction of high efficacy vaccines, which can however, still achieve lower numbers of infections and better herd immunity.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0267840
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2686245566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A703449176</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_164d3013efce46da93b27d631ca0399e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A703449176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1062e5111c5b7eca10c1efb390264c626e5b1cdab54ca2fa78eafd56e6c335fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QHBNGLGZOmSRsvhGVYdWBhwa_bcJqezGRok9mmHZx_b-p0l6nsheQiIXnOm_PxJslLShaU5fTD1vetg3qx8w4XJBV5kZFHyTmVLJ2LlLDHJ-ez5FkIW0I4K4R4mpwxznnKOTtPiitjrAZ9mO2xDX2YQdm7Cpw-fJwtfbOD1rr1bA9aWwed9W4W9AYbDM-TJwbqgC_G_SL5-fnqx_Lr_Prmy2p5eT3XQqbdnBKRIqeUal7mqIESTdGUTMaMMy1SgbykuoKSZxpSA3mBYCouUGjGuKnYRfL6qLurfVBj0UGlohBpxrkQkVgdicrDVu1a20B7UB6s-nvh27WCtrO6RkVFVjFCGRqNmahAsjLNK8GoBsKkxKj1afytLxusNLquhXoiOn1xdqPWfq8kkbkshmTejQKtv-0xdKqxQWNdg0PfD3mLLJdxVnlE3_yDPlzdSK0hFmCd8fFfPYiqy5ywLJM0H6jFA1RcFTZWR4cYG-8nAe8nAZHp8He3hj4Etfr-7f_Zm19T9u0Ju0Gou03wdT9YJ0zB7Ajq1ofQorlvMiVqMPhdN9RgcDUaPIa9Oh3QfdCdo9kfAff1SQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686245566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy versus abundancy: Comparing vaccination schemes</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>El Deeb, Omar ; Jalloul, Maya</creator><contributor>Supriatna, Asep K.</contributor><creatorcontrib>El Deeb, Omar ; Jalloul, Maya ; Supriatna, Asep K.</creatorcontrib><description>We introduce a novel compartmental model accounting for the effects of vaccine efficacy, deployment rates and timing of initiation of deployment. We simulate different scenarios and initial conditions, and we find that higher abundancy and rate of deployment of low efficacy vaccines lowers the cumulative number of deaths in comparison to slower deployment of high efficacy vaccines. We also forecast that, at the same daily deployment rate, the earlier introduction of vaccination schemes with lower efficacy would also lower the number of deaths with respect to a delayed introduction of high efficacy vaccines, which can however, still achieve lower numbers of infections and better herd immunity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267840</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35552553</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Disease transmission ; Economic conditions ; Epidemics ; Evaluation ; Fatalities ; Herd immunity ; Immunity, Herd ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Initial conditions ; Management ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Ordinary differential equations ; Pandemics ; Population ; Public health ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Vaccination ; Vaccine efficacy ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0267840-e0267840</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1062e5111c5b7eca10c1efb390264c626e5b1cdab54ca2fa78eafd56e6c335fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1062e5111c5b7eca10c1efb390264c626e5b1cdab54ca2fa78eafd56e6c335fd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9786-8292</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2686245566/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2686245566?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35552553$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Supriatna, Asep K.</contributor><creatorcontrib>El Deeb, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalloul, Maya</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy versus abundancy: Comparing vaccination schemes</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>We introduce a novel compartmental model accounting for the effects of vaccine efficacy, deployment rates and timing of initiation of deployment. We simulate different scenarios and initial conditions, and we find that higher abundancy and rate of deployment of low efficacy vaccines lowers the cumulative number of deaths in comparison to slower deployment of high efficacy vaccines. We also forecast that, at the same daily deployment rate, the earlier introduction of vaccination schemes with lower efficacy would also lower the number of deaths with respect to a delayed introduction of high efficacy vaccines, which can however, still achieve lower numbers of infections and better herd immunity.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Herd immunity</subject><subject>Immunity, Herd</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Initial conditions</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Ordinary differential equations</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccine efficacy</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QHBNGLGZOmSRsvhGVYdWBhwa_bcJqezGRok9mmHZx_b-p0l6nsheQiIXnOm_PxJslLShaU5fTD1vetg3qx8w4XJBV5kZFHyTmVLJ2LlLDHJ-ez5FkIW0I4K4R4mpwxznnKOTtPiitjrAZ9mO2xDX2YQdm7Cpw-fJwtfbOD1rr1bA9aWwed9W4W9AYbDM-TJwbqgC_G_SL5-fnqx_Lr_Prmy2p5eT3XQqbdnBKRIqeUal7mqIESTdGUTMaMMy1SgbykuoKSZxpSA3mBYCouUGjGuKnYRfL6qLurfVBj0UGlohBpxrkQkVgdicrDVu1a20B7UB6s-nvh27WCtrO6RkVFVjFCGRqNmahAsjLNK8GoBsKkxKj1afytLxusNLquhXoiOn1xdqPWfq8kkbkshmTejQKtv-0xdKqxQWNdg0PfD3mLLJdxVnlE3_yDPlzdSK0hFmCd8fFfPYiqy5ywLJM0H6jFA1RcFTZWR4cYG-8nAe8nAZHp8He3hj4Etfr-7f_Zm19T9u0Ju0Gou03wdT9YJ0zB7Ajq1ofQorlvMiVqMPhdN9RgcDUaPIa9Oh3QfdCdo9kfAff1SQ</recordid><startdate>20220512</startdate><enddate>20220512</enddate><creator>El Deeb, Omar</creator><creator>Jalloul, Maya</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9786-8292</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220512</creationdate><title>Efficacy versus abundancy: Comparing vaccination schemes</title><author>El Deeb, Omar ; Jalloul, Maya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1062e5111c5b7eca10c1efb390264c626e5b1cdab54ca2fa78eafd56e6c335fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Herd immunity</topic><topic>Immunity, Herd</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Initial conditions</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Ordinary differential equations</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccine efficacy</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El Deeb, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalloul, Maya</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El Deeb, Omar</au><au>Jalloul, Maya</au><au>Supriatna, Asep K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy versus abundancy: Comparing vaccination schemes</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-05-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0267840</spage><epage>e0267840</epage><pages>e0267840-e0267840</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>We introduce a novel compartmental model accounting for the effects of vaccine efficacy, deployment rates and timing of initiation of deployment. We simulate different scenarios and initial conditions, and we find that higher abundancy and rate of deployment of low efficacy vaccines lowers the cumulative number of deaths in comparison to slower deployment of high efficacy vaccines. We also forecast that, at the same daily deployment rate, the earlier introduction of vaccination schemes with lower efficacy would also lower the number of deaths with respect to a delayed introduction of high efficacy vaccines, which can however, still achieve lower numbers of infections and better herd immunity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35552553</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0267840</doi><tpages>e0267840</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9786-8292</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0267840-e0267840
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2686245566
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central
subjects Biology and Life Sciences
Coronaviruses
COVID-19 vaccines
Disease transmission
Economic conditions
Epidemics
Evaluation
Fatalities
Herd immunity
Immunity, Herd
Infections
Infectious diseases
Initial conditions
Management
Medicine and Health Sciences
Ordinary differential equations
Pandemics
Population
Public health
R&D
Research & development
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Vaccination
Vaccine efficacy
Vaccines
title Efficacy versus abundancy: Comparing vaccination schemes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A09%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20versus%20abundancy:%20Comparing%20vaccination%20schemes&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=El%20Deeb,%20Omar&rft.date=2022-05-12&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0267840&rft.epage=e0267840&rft.pages=e0267840-e0267840&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0267840&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA703449176%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-1062e5111c5b7eca10c1efb390264c626e5b1cdab54ca2fa78eafd56e6c335fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686245566&rft_id=info:pmid/35552553&rft_galeid=A703449176&rfr_iscdi=true