Loading…

Obstetric shift-to-shift handover in Kerala, India: A cross-sectional mixed method study

Beyond the provision of services, quality of care and patient safety measures such as optimal clinical handover at shift changes determine maternity outcomes. We aimed to establish the proportion of women handed over and the content of clinical handovers and communication between shifts within 3 div...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0268239-e0268239
Main Authors: Pilcher, Lucy, Kurian, Merina, MacArthur, Christine, Singh, Sanjeev, Manaseki-Holland, Semira
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d7ba0f1d7c22662474aa9536651c6f58fb1b4d3101ed717fe48e8ed11f0709ca3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d7ba0f1d7c22662474aa9536651c6f58fb1b4d3101ed717fe48e8ed11f0709ca3
container_end_page e0268239
container_issue 5
container_start_page e0268239
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Pilcher, Lucy
Kurian, Merina
MacArthur, Christine
Singh, Sanjeev
Manaseki-Holland, Semira
description Beyond the provision of services, quality of care and patient safety measures such as optimal clinical handover at shift changes determine maternity outcomes. We aimed to establish the proportion of women handed over and the content of clinical handovers and communication between shifts within 3 diverse obstetrics units in Kerala, India, and to describe the handover environment. A cross sectional study was conducted for six weeks during February and March 2015at three hospitals in Kerala, India, during nurses obstetric handover in one tertiary private, one tertiary government and one secondary government hospital. Nursing handovers in obstetric post-operative, in-patient and labour wards were sampled. An SBAR-based (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) data schedule was completed whilst observing handover at nursing shift changes. Since obstetricians had no scheduled handover, qualitative interviews were conducted with obstetricians in two hospitals to establish how they acquire information when beginning a shift. Data was obtained on 258 patients handed over, within 67 shift changes. The median percentage of women handed over was 100% in two of the hospitals and 27.6% in the other. The median number of information items included out of a possible 25 was 11, 5 and 4,and did not change significantly for women with high-risk status. Important items regarding assessment and recommendation for care were often missed, including high-risk status. The median number of environment items achieved was good at 7 out of 10 in all hospitals. Obstetricians sought information in various ways when required. All supported the development of structured tools, face-to-face and team handovers. Maternity unit handovers for doctors and nurses were inadequate. Ensuring handover of all women and including critical information, between shifts as well as between doctors, needs to be improved to increase patient safety.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0268239
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2686246208</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A703449174</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_83391a4bde9f48e298d6fbbb74c2e2ec</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A703449174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d7ba0f1d7c22662474aa9536651c6f58fb1b4d3101ed717fe48e8ed11f0709ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLC6Jgx3y0aeuFMCx-DC4M-IV3IU1OphnaZmzSZfffm850l6nsheSiIX3Oe3LenBNFzzFaYJrjd1s79J1oFjvbwQIRVhBaPohOcUlJwgiiD4_2J9ET57YIZbRg7HF0QrMsQyxFp9HvdeU8-N7I2NVG-8TbZL-Ja9EpewV9bLr4K_SiEW_jVaeMeB8vY9lb5xIH0hsbLhG35hpU3IKvrYqdH9TN0-iRFo2DZ9P3LPr56eOPiy_J5frz6mJ5mUhWEp-ovBJIY5VLQhgjaZ4KUWaUsQxLprNCV7hKFcUIg8pxriEtoACFsUY5KqWgZ9HLg-6usY5Ppjge_AhqofYiEKsDoazY8l1vWtHfcCsM3x_YfsNF741sgBeUlliklYJSh0SkLBTTVVXlqSRAQAatD1O2oWpBSeh8cGYmOv_TmZpv7BUvUVkgmgaB15NAb_8M4DxvjZPQNKIDO4z3ZmleZCQf0fN_0Purm6iNCAWYTtuQV46ifJmHjGmJ91qLe6iwFLRGhg7SJpzPAt7MAgLj4dpvxOAcX33_9v_s-tecfXXE1iAaXzvbDGMfuTmYHsB9q_Wg70zGiI8DcOsGHweATwMQwl4cP9Bd0G3H078iEgAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686246208</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Obstetric shift-to-shift handover in Kerala, India: A cross-sectional mixed method study</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Pilcher, Lucy ; Kurian, Merina ; MacArthur, Christine ; Singh, Sanjeev ; Manaseki-Holland, Semira</creator><contributor>Mordaunt, Dylan A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pilcher, Lucy ; Kurian, Merina ; MacArthur, Christine ; Singh, Sanjeev ; Manaseki-Holland, Semira ; Mordaunt, Dylan A.</creatorcontrib><description>Beyond the provision of services, quality of care and patient safety measures such as optimal clinical handover at shift changes determine maternity outcomes. We aimed to establish the proportion of women handed over and the content of clinical handovers and communication between shifts within 3 diverse obstetrics units in Kerala, India, and to describe the handover environment. A cross sectional study was conducted for six weeks during February and March 2015at three hospitals in Kerala, India, during nurses obstetric handover in one tertiary private, one tertiary government and one secondary government hospital. Nursing handovers in obstetric post-operative, in-patient and labour wards were sampled. An SBAR-based (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) data schedule was completed whilst observing handover at nursing shift changes. Since obstetricians had no scheduled handover, qualitative interviews were conducted with obstetricians in two hospitals to establish how they acquire information when beginning a shift. Data was obtained on 258 patients handed over, within 67 shift changes. The median percentage of women handed over was 100% in two of the hospitals and 27.6% in the other. The median number of information items included out of a possible 25 was 11, 5 and 4,and did not change significantly for women with high-risk status. Important items regarding assessment and recommendation for care were often missed, including high-risk status. The median number of environment items achieved was good at 7 out of 10 in all hospitals. Obstetricians sought information in various ways when required. All supported the development of structured tools, face-to-face and team handovers. Maternity unit handovers for doctors and nurses were inadequate. Ensuring handover of all women and including critical information, between shifts as well as between doctors, needs to be improved to increase patient safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268239</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35550640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor ; Communication ; Continuity of care ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Earth Sciences ; Evaluation ; Female ; Gynecology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; India ; Interpreters ; Management ; Maternal child nursing ; Maternal health services ; Medical care ; Medical personnel ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mixed methods research ; Mortality ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Obstetrics ; Patient Handoff ; Patient Safety ; Patients ; People and Places ; Physicians ; Pregnancy ; Quality management ; Quality of care ; Safety measures ; Schedules ; Social Sciences ; Tertiary ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0268239-e0268239</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Pilcher et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Pilcher et al 2022 Pilcher et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d7ba0f1d7c22662474aa9536651c6f58fb1b4d3101ed717fe48e8ed11f0709ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d7ba0f1d7c22662474aa9536651c6f58fb1b4d3101ed717fe48e8ed11f0709ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5827-8855</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2686246208/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2686246208?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,74897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35550640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mordaunt, Dylan A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pilcher, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurian, Merina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacArthur, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manaseki-Holland, Semira</creatorcontrib><title>Obstetric shift-to-shift handover in Kerala, India: A cross-sectional mixed method study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Beyond the provision of services, quality of care and patient safety measures such as optimal clinical handover at shift changes determine maternity outcomes. We aimed to establish the proportion of women handed over and the content of clinical handovers and communication between shifts within 3 diverse obstetrics units in Kerala, India, and to describe the handover environment. A cross sectional study was conducted for six weeks during February and March 2015at three hospitals in Kerala, India, during nurses obstetric handover in one tertiary private, one tertiary government and one secondary government hospital. Nursing handovers in obstetric post-operative, in-patient and labour wards were sampled. An SBAR-based (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) data schedule was completed whilst observing handover at nursing shift changes. Since obstetricians had no scheduled handover, qualitative interviews were conducted with obstetricians in two hospitals to establish how they acquire information when beginning a shift. Data was obtained on 258 patients handed over, within 67 shift changes. The median percentage of women handed over was 100% in two of the hospitals and 27.6% in the other. The median number of information items included out of a possible 25 was 11, 5 and 4,and did not change significantly for women with high-risk status. Important items regarding assessment and recommendation for care were often missed, including high-risk status. The median number of environment items achieved was good at 7 out of 10 in all hospitals. Obstetricians sought information in various ways when required. All supported the development of structured tools, face-to-face and team handovers. Maternity unit handovers for doctors and nurses were inadequate. Ensuring handover of all women and including critical information, between shifts as well as between doctors, needs to be improved to increase patient safety.</description><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Interpreters</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Maternal child nursing</subject><subject>Maternal health services</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Patient Handoff</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Safety measures</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Tertiary</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLC6Jgx3y0aeuFMCx-DC4M-IV3IU1OphnaZmzSZfffm850l6nsheSiIX3Oe3LenBNFzzFaYJrjd1s79J1oFjvbwQIRVhBaPohOcUlJwgiiD4_2J9ET57YIZbRg7HF0QrMsQyxFp9HvdeU8-N7I2NVG-8TbZL-Ja9EpewV9bLr4K_SiEW_jVaeMeB8vY9lb5xIH0hsbLhG35hpU3IKvrYqdH9TN0-iRFo2DZ9P3LPr56eOPiy_J5frz6mJ5mUhWEp-ovBJIY5VLQhgjaZ4KUWaUsQxLprNCV7hKFcUIg8pxriEtoACFsUY5KqWgZ9HLg-6usY5Ppjge_AhqofYiEKsDoazY8l1vWtHfcCsM3x_YfsNF741sgBeUlliklYJSh0SkLBTTVVXlqSRAQAatD1O2oWpBSeh8cGYmOv_TmZpv7BUvUVkgmgaB15NAb_8M4DxvjZPQNKIDO4z3ZmleZCQf0fN_0Purm6iNCAWYTtuQV46ifJmHjGmJ91qLe6iwFLRGhg7SJpzPAt7MAgLj4dpvxOAcX33_9v_s-tecfXXE1iAaXzvbDGMfuTmYHsB9q_Wg70zGiI8DcOsGHweATwMQwl4cP9Bd0G3H078iEgAI</recordid><startdate>20220512</startdate><enddate>20220512</enddate><creator>Pilcher, Lucy</creator><creator>Kurian, Merina</creator><creator>MacArthur, Christine</creator><creator>Singh, Sanjeev</creator><creator>Manaseki-Holland, Semira</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5827-8855</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220512</creationdate><title>Obstetric shift-to-shift handover in Kerala, India: A cross-sectional mixed method study</title><author>Pilcher, Lucy ; Kurian, Merina ; MacArthur, Christine ; Singh, Sanjeev ; Manaseki-Holland, Semira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d7ba0f1d7c22662474aa9536651c6f58fb1b4d3101ed717fe48e8ed11f0709ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Interpreters</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Maternal child nursing</topic><topic>Maternal health services</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Patient Handoff</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Safety measures</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Tertiary</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pilcher, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurian, Merina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacArthur, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manaseki-Holland, Semira</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Science In Context</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pilcher, Lucy</au><au>Kurian, Merina</au><au>MacArthur, Christine</au><au>Singh, Sanjeev</au><au>Manaseki-Holland, Semira</au><au>Mordaunt, Dylan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Obstetric shift-to-shift handover in Kerala, India: A cross-sectional mixed method study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-05-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0268239</spage><epage>e0268239</epage><pages>e0268239-e0268239</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Beyond the provision of services, quality of care and patient safety measures such as optimal clinical handover at shift changes determine maternity outcomes. We aimed to establish the proportion of women handed over and the content of clinical handovers and communication between shifts within 3 diverse obstetrics units in Kerala, India, and to describe the handover environment. A cross sectional study was conducted for six weeks during February and March 2015at three hospitals in Kerala, India, during nurses obstetric handover in one tertiary private, one tertiary government and one secondary government hospital. Nursing handovers in obstetric post-operative, in-patient and labour wards were sampled. An SBAR-based (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) data schedule was completed whilst observing handover at nursing shift changes. Since obstetricians had no scheduled handover, qualitative interviews were conducted with obstetricians in two hospitals to establish how they acquire information when beginning a shift. Data was obtained on 258 patients handed over, within 67 shift changes. The median percentage of women handed over was 100% in two of the hospitals and 27.6% in the other. The median number of information items included out of a possible 25 was 11, 5 and 4,and did not change significantly for women with high-risk status. Important items regarding assessment and recommendation for care were often missed, including high-risk status. The median number of environment items achieved was good at 7 out of 10 in all hospitals. Obstetricians sought information in various ways when required. All supported the development of structured tools, face-to-face and team handovers. Maternity unit handovers for doctors and nurses were inadequate. Ensuring handover of all women and including critical information, between shifts as well as between doctors, needs to be improved to increase patient safety.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35550640</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0268239</doi><tpages>e0268239</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5827-8855</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0268239-e0268239
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2686246208
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Childbirth & labor
Communication
Continuity of care
Cross-Sectional Studies
Earth Sciences
Evaluation
Female
Gynecology
Hospitals
Humans
India
Interpreters
Management
Maternal child nursing
Maternal health services
Medical care
Medical personnel
Medicine and Health Sciences
Mixed methods research
Mortality
Nurses
Nursing
Obstetrics
Patient Handoff
Patient Safety
Patients
People and Places
Physicians
Pregnancy
Quality management
Quality of care
Safety measures
Schedules
Social Sciences
Tertiary
Womens health
title Obstetric shift-to-shift handover in Kerala, India: A cross-sectional mixed method study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A14%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Obstetric%20shift-to-shift%20handover%20in%20Kerala,%20India:%20A%20cross-sectional%20mixed%20method%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Pilcher,%20Lucy&rft.date=2022-05-12&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0268239&rft.epage=e0268239&rft.pages=e0268239-e0268239&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0268239&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA703449174%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-d7ba0f1d7c22662474aa9536651c6f58fb1b4d3101ed717fe48e8ed11f0709ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686246208&rft_id=info:pmid/35550640&rft_galeid=A703449174&rfr_iscdi=true