Correlation between relative afferent pupillary defect and visual field defects on Humphrey automated perimetry: A cross-sectional clinical trial

• Published in: PloS one 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0267469-e0267469
• Main Authors: Witthayaweerasak, Juthamat, Lertjittham, Pemika, Aui-Aree, Nipat
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Automation; Biology and life sciences; Clinical trials; Correlation; Correlation coefficient; Correlation coefficients; Density; Evaluation; Filters; Hospitals; Light; Medicine and Health Sciences; Neuropathy; Optic neuropathy; Parameters; Patients; Perimetry; Physical Sciences; Random amplified polymorphic DNA; Regression analysis; Research and analysis methods; Retinopathy; Sensory neurons; Social Sciences; Visual field; Visual fields
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267469

To evaluate the correlations between relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) magnitude, assessed using the clinical plus scale and neutral density filters, and visual field parameters in patients with unilateral or asymmetrical bilateral optic neuropathy or retinopathy. Fifty-two patients with RAPD, graded by the swinging flashlight test and neutral density filters, were analyzed in this cross-sectional trial. The RAPD clinical plus scale was divided into grade 1+, initial weak constriction; grade 2+, initial stall then dilatation; grade 3+, immediate dilatation; and grade 4+, fixed amaurotic pupil. Patients with positive RAPD underwent a visual field examination with Humphrey automated perimetry that included visual field index (VFI), mean deviation (MD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD). Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and linear regression were used to analyze the association between RAPD grades and visual field parameters. RAPD clinical plus grades were correlated with interocular VFI (r = 0.55, P < 0.001) and MD (r = 0.48, P = 0.004) differences. Average interocular VFI differences were estimated as follows: 16.75 × RAPD plus grade- 7.53. RAPD, graded by neutral density filters, was correlated with VFI (r = 0.59, P < 0.001), MD (r = 0.54, P < 0.001), and PSD (r = 0.34, P = 0.01). The RAPD plus scale and neutral density filter grading systems were associated with quantitative visual field defect parameters, with VFI showing the strongest association. RAPD clinical grading could substitute more sophisticated central visual field evaluation methods as a low-cost, low-tech, and widely available approach.